Mechanisms and feasibility of prey capture in ambush-feeding zooplankton

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 106, Issue 30, 2009, Pages 12394-12399

  Kiørboe, Thomas ^a   Andersen, Anders ^a   Langlois, Vincent J ^a,b   Jakobsen, Hans Henrik ^a   Bohr, Tomas ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Biological fluid dynamics; Boundary layer; Copepod; Potential flow

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BOUNDARY LAYER; COPEPOD; FEEDING; HYDRODYNAMICS; JUMPING; NONHUMAN; PREY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; VELOCITY; VISCOSITY; ZOOPLANKTON;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; COPEPODA; DINOFLAGELLIDA; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; TIME FACTORS; VIDEODISC RECORDING; ZOOPLANKTON;

CHAETOGNATHA; COPEPODA;

EID: 68149120532     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903350106     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Hansen PJ, Bjørnsen PK, Hansen BW (1997) Zooplankton grazing and growth: Scaling within the 2- to 2,000-μm body size range. Limnol Oceanogr 42:687-704.
2. Fenchel T (1986) The ecology of heterotrophic microflagellates. Adv Microb Ecol 9:57-97.
3. Flood PR (1991) Architecture of, and water circulation and flow rate in, the house of the planktonic tunicate Oikopleura labradoriensis. Mar Biol 111:95-111.
4. Dalpadado P, Yamaguchi A, Ellertsen B, Johannessen S (2008) Trophic interactions of macro-zooplankton (krill and amphipods) in the Marginal Ice Zone of the Barents Sea. Deep Sea Res II 55:2266-2274.
5. Jonsson PR, Tiselius P (1990) Feeding behavior, prey detection, and capture efficiency of the copepod Acartia tonsa feeding on planktonic ciliates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 60:35-44.
6. Feigenbaum D, Reeve MR (1977) Prey detection in Chaetognatha: Response to a vibrating probe and experimental determination of attack distance in large aquaria. Limnol Oceanogr 22:1052-1058.
7. Svensen C, Kiørboe T (2000) Remote prey detection in Oithona similis: Hydromechanical vs. chemical cues. J Plankton Res 22:1155-1166.
8. Costello JH, Colin SP, Dabiri JO (2008) Medusan morphospace: Phylogenetic constraints, biomechanical solutions, and ecological consequences. Inv Biol 127:265-290.
9. Galienne CP, Robins DB (2001) Is Oithona the most important copepod in the world's oceans? J Plankton Res 23:1421-1432.
10. Paffenhöfer GA (2006) Oxygen consumption in relation to motion of marine planktonic copepods. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 317:187-192.
11. Castellani C, Robinson C, Smith T, Lampitt RS (2005) Temperature affects respiration rate of Oithona similes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 285:129-135.
12. Eiane K, Ohman MD (2004) Stage-specific mortality of Calanus finmarchicus, Pseudocalanus elongatus, and Oithona similis on Fladen Ground, North Sea, during a spring bloom. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 268:183-193.
13. Koehl MAR, Strickler JR (1981) Copepod feeding currents. Food capture at low Reynolds number. Limnol Oceanogr 26:1062-1073.
14. Andrews DJ (1983) Deformation of the active spaces in the low Reynolds number feeding current of calanoid copepods. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:1293-1302.
15. Strickler JR (1975) Intra- and interspecific information flow among planktonic copepods receptors. Verh Internat Verein Limnol 19:2951-2958.
16. Jiang H, Paffenhöfer GA (2008) Hydrodynamic signal perception by the copepod Oithona plumifera. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 373:37-52.
17. Jakobsen HH (2002) Escape of protists in predator-generated feeding currents. Aquat Microb Ecol 26:271-281.
18. Nakamura Y, Turner JT (1997) Predation and respiration by the small cyclopoid copepod Oithona similis: How important is feeding on ciliates and heterotrophic flagellates? J Plankton Res 19:1275-1288.
19. Saiz E, Calbet A, Broglio E (2003) Effects of small-scale turbulence on copepods: The case of Oithona davisae. Limnol Oceanogr 48:1304-1311.
20. Kiørboe T, Visser AW (1999) Predator and prey perception in copepods due to hydromechanical signals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 179:81-95.
21. Batchelor GK (1967) An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
22. Lenz PH, Hower AE, Hartline DK (2004) Force production during pereiopod power strokes in Calanus finmarchicus. J Mar Systems 49:133-144.
23. Askew GN, Marsh RL (2002) Review: Muscle designed for maximum short-term power output: Quail flight muscle. J Exp Biol 205:2153-2160.
24. Buskey EJ, Lenz PH, Hartline DK (2002) Escape behavior of planktonic copepods in response to hydrodynamic disturbances: High-speed video analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 235:135-146.
25. Titelman J, Kiørboe T (2003) Predator avoidance by nauplii. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 247:137-149.
26. Machemer H, Deitmer JW (1985) in Progress in Sensory Physiology, ed Ottoson D (Springer, Berlin), pp 81-118.
27. Lenz PH, Hartline DK, Davis AD (2000) The need for speed. I. Fast reactions and myelinated axons in copepods. J Comp Phys A 186:337-345.
28. Waggett RJN, Buskey EJ (2008) Escape reaction performance of myelinated and nonmyelinated calanoid copepods. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 361:111-118.
29. Feigenbaum DL (1978) Hair fan patterns in the Chaetognatha. J Can Zool 56:536-546.
30. Yen J, Strickler JR (1996) Advertisement and concealment in the plankton: What makes a copepod hydrodynamically conspicuous? Inv Biol 115:191-205.
31. Waggett RJ, Buskey EJ (2007) Calanoid copepod escape behavior in response to a visual predator. Mar Biol 150:599-607.
32. Koga F (1984) The developmental stages of Temora turbinate (Copepoda: Calanoida). Bull Plankton Soc Japan 31:43-52.
33. Burdick DS, Hartline DK, Lenz PH (2007) Escape strategies in co-occurring calanoid copepods. Limnol Oceanogr 52:2373-2385.