What type of information is trusted by whom? A multilevel analysis of the stability of the information source-trust association for blood transfusion

Transfusion

Volumn 49, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1637-1648

  Ferguson, Eamonn ^a   Spence, Alexa ^b   Townsend, Ellen ^b   Prowse, Chris ^b   Palmer, Joyce ^b   Fleming, Piers ^b   Van Hilten, Joost A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SERVICE; KNOWLEDGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NETHERLANDS; NORMAL HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TRUST; UNITED KINGDOM;

BLOOD TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH LITERACY; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; NETHERLANDS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 68149089457     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02179.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Finucane ML, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Public perception of the risk of blood transfusion. Transfusion 2000 40 : 1017 22.
2. Lowe KC, Farrell K, Ferguson E, James V. Current perceived risks of transfusion in the UK and relevance to the future acceptance of blood substitutes. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 2001 29 : 179 89.
3. Lowe KC, Ferguson E. Benefit and risk perceptions in transfusion medicine: blood and blood substitutes. J Intern Med 2003 253 : 498 507.
4. Ferguson E, Prowse C, Townsend E, Spence A, van Hilten JA, Lowe K. Acceptability of blood substitutes. J Intern Med 2008 263 : 244 55.
5. Slovic P. Perceived risk, trust and democracy. Risk Anal 1993 13 : 576 682.
6. Frewer LJ, Howard C, Hedderley D, Shepherd R. What determines trust in information about food related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Anal 1996 16 : 473 86.
7. De Jonge J, van Trijp H, JanRenes R, Frewer L. Understanding consumer confidence in the safety of food: its two-dimensional structure and determinants. Risk Anal 2007 27 : 729 40.
8. Ferguson E, Farrell K, James V, Lowe KC. Trustworthiness of information about blood donation and transfusion in relation to knowledge and perceptions of risk: an analysis of UK stakeholder groups. Transfus Med 2004 14 : 205 16.
9. Carnevale DG, Wechseler B. Trust in the public-sector - individual and organisational determinants. Admin Soc 1992 23 : 471 94.
10. Halbert CH, Armstrong K, Gandy OH Jr., Shaker L. Racial differences in trust in health care providers. Arch Intern Med 2006 166 : 896 901.
11. Doescher MP, Saver BG, Franks P, Fiscella K. Racial and ethnic disparities in perceptions of physician style and trust. Arch Fam Med 2000 9 : 1156 63.
12. Tarrant C, Stokes T, Baker R. Factors associated with patients' trust in their general practitioner: a cross-sectional survey. Br J Gen Pract 2003 53 : 798 800.
13. Hall MA, Dugan E, Zheng B, Mishra AK. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? Milbank Quart 2001 79 : 613 39.
14. Delhey J, Newton K. Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? Euro Soc Rev 2005 21 : 311 27.
15. Ferguson E. The roles of contextual moderation and personality in relation to the knowledge-risk link in the workplace. J Risk Res 2001 4 : 323 40.
16. Kraiger K, Foed JK, Salaa E. Application of cognitive, skill-based and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. J Appl Psychol 1993 78 : 311 28.
17. Slovic P. Risk perception. Science 1987 236 : 280 5.
18. Slovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Anal 1999 19 : 689 701.
19. Wilson K. The Krever commission: 10 years later. CMAJ 2007 177 : 1387 9.
20. Sjoberg L. Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust. Risk Anal 2001 21 : 189 98.
21. Peters RG, Covello VT, McCallum DB. The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study. Risk Anal 1997 17 : 43 54.
22. Ferguson E, Farrell K, Lowe KC, James V. Perception of risk of blood transfusion: knowledge, group membership and perceived control. Transfus Med 2001 11 : 129 35.
23. Ferguson E, Farrell K, Lowe KC, James V. Perception of risk of blood transfusion: knowledge, group membership and perceived control. Transfus Med 2001 11 : 129 35. Erratum in: Transfus Med 2002;12:81.
24. Wilson TD, Purdon SE, Wallson KA. Compliance to health recommendations: a theoretical overview of message framing. Health Educ Res 1988 3 : 161 71.
25. Levin IP, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ. All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Dec Processes 1998 76 : 149 88.
26. Orth UR, Koenig HF, Firbasova Z. Cross-national differences in consumer response to the framing of advertising messages - an exploratory comparison from Central Europe. Euro J Mark 2007 41 : 327 48.
27. Lauriola M, Russo PM, Lucidi F, Violani C, Levin IP. The role of personality in positively and negatively framed risky health decisions. Pers Indiv Differ 2005 38 : 45 59.
28. Frewer LJ, Miles S. Temporal stability of the psychological determinants of trust: implications for communication about food risks. Health Risk Soc 2003 5 : 259 71.
29. Office for National Statistics. Census 2001: the most comprehensive survey of the UK population 2001. Newport : Office for National Statistics. [Cited February 26, 2007.] Available from: URL: http://www.statistics.gov.uk
30. Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess 1995 7 : 286 99.
31. Raudenbush S, Bryk AS, Cheong YF, Congdon R. HLM6: hierarchical linear and non-linear modelling. Chicago (IL) : Scientific Software International 2005.
32. Raudenbush S, Bryk AS. Hierarchical linear models. 2nd ed. London : Sage 2002.
33. Kreft IG, de Leeuw J, Aiken LS. The effect of different forms of centering in Hierarchical Linear Models. Multivar Behav Res 1995 30 : 1 21.
34. Snijders T, Bosker R. Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London : Sage 1999.
35. Hox J. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. London : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2002.
36. Schafer JL, Yucel RM. Computational strategies for multivariate linear mixed effects models with missing values. J Comput Graph Stat 2002 11 : 437 57.
37. Haukoos JS, Newgard CD. Advanced statistics: missing data in clinical research - Part 1: an introduction and conceptual framework. Acad Emerg Med 2007 14 : 662 8.
38. Newgard CD, Haukoos JS. Advanced statistics: missing data in clinical research - Part 2: multiple imputation. Acad Emerg Med 2007 14 : 669 78.
39. Gibson NM, Olejnik S. Treatment of missing data at the second level of hierarchical linear models. Educ Psychol Meas 2003 63 : 204 38.
40. Graham JW, Olchowski AE, Gilreath TD. How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prev Sci 2007 8 : 206 13.
41. Liu M, Wei L, Zhang J. Review of guidelines and literature for handling missing data in longitudinal clinical trials with a case study. Pharac Stat 2006 5 : 7 18.
42. Jaccard J. ZumaStat statistical methods. Miami (FL) : Applied Scientific Analysis 2006. Available from: URL: http://www.zumastat.com
43. Olinsky A, Chen S, Harlow L. The comparative efficacy of imputation methods for missing data in structural equation modelling. Euro J Operat Res 2003 151 : 53 79.
44. Ferguson E, Cox T. Exploratory factor analysis: a user's guide. Int J Sel Assess 1993 1 : 84 94.
45. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes on covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Model 1999 6 : 1 55.
46. Helliwell JF, Putnam RD. The social context of well-being. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 2004 359 : 1435 46.
47. Yamaoka K. Social capital and health and well-being in East Asia: a population-based study. Soc Sci Med 2008 66 : 885 99.
48. Helliwell JF. Well-being, social capital and public policy: what's new? Econ J 2006 116 : C34 C45.
49. Keren J. Calibration and probability judgements: conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Scand 1991 77 : 217 73.
50. Dunn JR, Scheitzer ME. Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005 88 : 736 48.
51. Neumann R, Beate S, Strack F. The influence of mood on the intensity of emotional responses: disentangling feeling and knowing. Cogn Emot 2001 15 : 725 47.
52. Farrell K, Ferguson E, James V, Lowe K. Confidence in the safety of blood for transfusion: the effect of message framing. Transfusion 2001 41 : 1335 40.
53. Ferguson E, Leaviss J, Townsend E, Fleming P, Lowe KC. Perceived safety of donor blood and blood substitutes for transfusion: the role of informational frame, patient groups and stress appraisals. Transfus Med 2005 15 : 401 12.
54. Hoffrage U, Lindsey S, Hertwig R, Gigerenzer G. Communicating statistical information. Science 2000 290 : 2261 2.
55. Ferguson E, Bibby PA, Leaviss J, Weyman A. Effective design of workplace risk communications. HSE Research Report 093. Books, Sudbury : HSE 2003.