Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 239-248

  Canay, Senay ^a   Akça, Kvanç ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Diametershifting; Implant abutment connection; Platform switching

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; JAW; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 68049139481     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318198ffd1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brånemark P-I, Adell R, Breine U, et al. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3:81-100.
2. Schroeder A, Pohler O, Sutter F. Tissue reaction to an implant of a titanium hollow cylinder with a titanium surface spray layer. SSO Scweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd. 1976;8:713-727.
3. Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, et al. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:645-652.
4. Hanggi MP, Hanggi DC, Schoolfield JD, et al. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. I. A retrospective radio-graphic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar lengths. J Periodontol. 2005;76:791-802.
5. Lindhe J, Berglundh T, Ericsson I, et al. Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:9-16.
6. Lang NP, Brä gger U, Walther D, et al. Ligature-induced periimplant infection in cynomolgus monkeys. I. Clinical and ra-diographic findings. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1993;4:2-11.
7. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:143-152.
8. Miyata T, Kobayashi Y, Araki H, et al. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. Part 3: A histo-logic study in monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:425-431.
9. Karoussis IK, Bragger U, Salvi GE, et al. Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants: A 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:8-17.
10. Baumgarten H, Cocchetto R, Testori T, et al. A new implant design for crestal bone preservation: Initial observations and case report. Pract Proced Aes-thet Dent. 2005;17:735-740.
11. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling post-restorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26:9-17.
12. Gardner DM. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. N Y State Dent J. 2005;713:34-37.
13. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, et al. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 2001;72:1372-1383.
14. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, et al. Biologic width around one- and two-piece titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:559-571.
15. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint design. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:290-298.
16. Hansson S. Implant-abutment interface: Biomechanical study of flat top versus conical. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2:33-41.
17. Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: An 8-degree taper compared to a butt-joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:519-526.
18. Ç ehreli MC, Akç a K, çSahin S, I?plikç ioǧ lu H. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally-notched morse taper oral implant: Influence of abutment design. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:459-465.
19. Hermann F, Lerner H, Palti A. Factors influencing the preservation of the periimplant marginal bone. Implant Dent. 2007;16:165-175.
20. Nebot XV, Ciurana XR, Alonso CR, et al. Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dent. 2006;15:313-320.
21. Guirado JLC, Yuguero MRS, Zamora GP, et al. Immediate provisionalization on a new implant design for esthetic restoration and preserving crestal bone. Implant Dent. 2007;16:155-164.
22. Canullo L, Rasperini G. Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: A proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36-month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:995-1000.
23. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1:11-25.25.
24. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: The International Congress of Oral Implan-tologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent. 2008;17:5-15.
25. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant abutment interface. J Dent Res. 2003;82:232-237.
26. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success of the Brånemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:104-111.
27. Hansson S. The implant neck: Smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:394-405.
28. Herman JS, Cochran DL, Nummiko-ski PV, et al. Crestal bone changes around titanium dental implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 1997;68:1117-1130.
29. Ç ehreli M, Duyck J, De cooman M, et al. Implants design and interface force transfer. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:249-257.
30. Maeda Y, Miura J, Taki I, et al. Bio-mechanical analysis on platform switching: Is there any biomechanical rationale? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:581-584.
31. Beaupre GS, Orr TE, Carter DR. An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling-application: A preliminary remodeling simulation. J Orthop Res. 1990;8:662-670.
32. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, et al. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech. 1987;20:1135-1150.