An evaluation of information on the internet of a new device: The lumbar artificial disc replacement

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 52-57

  Garcia, Ryan M ^a   Messerschmitt, Patrick J ^a   Ahn, Nicholas U ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial disc replacement; Internet; Lumbar; Patient education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL DISC REPLACEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; EVALUATION RESEARCH; INDUSTRY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; LUMBAR DISK; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC;

EID: 68049128304     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181651bf6     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine. 2005;30:1565-1575; discussion E387-E391. (Pubitemid 41024950)
2. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine. 2005;30:1576-1583; discussion E388-390E. (Pubitemid 41022418)
3. Zigler JE. Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II. Spine J. 2004;4(6 suppl):260S-267S.
4. Delamarter RB, Bae HW, Pradhan BB. Clinical results of ProDisc-II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States clinical trial. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36:301-313. (Pubitemid 40805091)
5. Delamarter RB, Fribourg DM, Kanim LE, et al. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine. 2003;28:S167-S175.
6. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, et al. The treatment of disabling single-level lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the Prodisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine. 2005;30:2230-2236. (Pubitemid 41429207)
7. Schulte TL, Bullmann V, Lerner T, et al. Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Established technique or experimental procedure? Orthopade. 2005;34:801-813.
8. van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:369-383. (Pubitemid 36959450)
9. Wagner WH, Regan JJ, Leary SP, et al. Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charite lumbar artificial disc replacement. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:1266-1272.
10. Shuff C, An HS. Artificial disc replacement: the new solution for discogenic low back pain? Am J Orthop. 2005;34:8-12.
11. Pimenta L, Diaz RC, Guerrero LG. Charite lumbar artificial disc retrieval: use of a lateral minimally invasive technique. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5:556-561. (Pubitemid 47325346)
12. Meding JB, Keating EM. Overview: long-term followup: predicting the success of a total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001:7-9. (Pubitemid 32595000)
13. McAuley JP, Szuszczewicz ES, Young A, et al. Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years and younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004:119-125. (Pubitemid 38140432)
14. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD, Fleming PA. The Charnley hip replacement - 43 years of clinical success. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006;73:6-9.
15. Liszka HA, Steyer TE, Hueston WJ. Virtual medical care: how are our patients using online health information? J Community Health. 2006;31:368-378.
16. Rose S, Bruce J, Maffulli N. Accessing the Internet for patient information about orthopedics. JAMA. 1998;280:1309. (Pubitemid 28473713)
17. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. Direct-to-consumer advertising: physicians' views of its effects on quality of care and the doctorpatient relationship. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003;16:513-524.
18. Findlay SD. Direct-to-consumer promotion of prescription drugs. Economic implications for patients, payers and providers. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19:109-119.
19. Booth RE Jr. Truth in advertising: the ethical limits of direct-to-consumer marketing. Orthopedics. 2006;29:780-781.
20. Adeoye S, Bozic KJ. Direct to consumer advertising in healthcare: history, benefits, and concerns. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:96-104. (Pubitemid 46573401)
21. Labovitch RS, Bozic KJ, Hansen E. An evaluation of information available on the internet regarding minimally invasive hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:1-5. (Pubitemid 43162978)
22. Greene DL, Appel AJ, Reinert SE, et al. Lumbar disc herniation: evaluation of information on the internet. Spine. 2005;30:826-829. (Pubitemid 40490601)
23. Mathur S, Shanti N, Brkaric M, et al. Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the internet. Spine. 2005;30:2695-2700. (Pubitemid 41780380)
24. Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ, Steinberg DR, et al. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the internet. The case of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82-A:1540-1543.
25. Moshirfar A, Campbell JT, Khasraghi FA, et al. Evaluating the quality of Internet-derived information on plantar fasciitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004:60-63. (Pubitemid 38579719)
26. Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine. 2003;28:S110-S117.
27. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Sariali el H, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum followup. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:353-359. (Pubitemid 44378153)
28. Leivseth G, Braaten S, Frobin W, et al. Mobility of lumbar segments instrumented with a ProDisc II prosthesis: a two-year follow-up study. Spine. 2006;31:1726-1733. (Pubitemid 43999972)
29. Denoziere G, Ku DN. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. J Biomech. 2006;39:766-775. (Pubitemid 43139004)
30. Huang RC, Sandhu HS. The current status of lumbar total disc replacement. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:33-42. (Pubitemid 38153089)
31. Chmell MJ, Poss R, Thomas WH, et al. Early failure of Hylamer acetabular inserts due to eccentric wear. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:351-353. (Pubitemid 26123476)
32. Ahn NU, Nallamshetty L, Ahn UM, et al. Early failure associated with the use of Hylamer-M spacers in three primary AMK total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:136-139. (Pubitemid 32097244)