Accommodation, acuity, and their relationship to emmetropization in infants

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 86, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 666-676

  Mutti, Donald O ^a   Mitchell, G Lynn ^a   Jones, Lisa A ^a   Friedman, Nina E ^b   Frane, Sara L ^b   Lin, Wendy K ^b   Moeschberger, Melvin L ^a   Zadnik, Karla ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Emmetropization; Infant vision; Refractive error; Visual development

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; EMMETROPIZATION; INFANT VISION; REFRACTIVE ERROR; VISUAL DEVELOPMENT;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

VISION;

CYCLOPENTOLATE;

ACCOMMODATION; ACCOMMODATION PARALYSIS; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERMETROPIA; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; RETINOSCOPY; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPEROPIA; INFANT; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; RETINOSCOPY; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 68049115647     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a6174f     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Santonastaso A. La rifrazione oculare nei primi anni di vita. Ann Ottalmol Clin Ocul 1930;58:852-884
2. Cook RC, Glasscock RE. Refractive and ocular findings in the newborn. Am J Ophthalmol 1951;34:1407-1413
3. Luyckx J. [Measurement of the optic components of the eye of the newborn by ultrasonic echography]. Arch Ophtalmol Rev Gen Ophtalmol 1966;26:159-170
4. Goldschmidt E. Refraction in the newborn. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1969;47:570-578
5. Zonis S, Miller B. Refractions in the Israeli newborn. J Pediatr Ophthalmol 1974;11:77-81.
6. Wood IC, Hodi S, Morgan L. Longitudinal change of refractive error in infants during the first year of life. Eye 1995;9:551-557
7. Saunders KJ, Woodhouse JM, Westall CA. Emmetropisation in human infancy: rate of change is related to initial refractive error. Vision Res 1995;35:1325-1328
8. Ehrlich DL, Atkinson J, Braddick O, Bobier W, Durden K. Reduction of infant myopia: a longitudinal cycloplegic study. Vision Res 1995;35:1313-1324
9. Mayer DL, Hansen RM, Moore BD, Kim S, Fulton AB. Cycloplegic refractions in healthy children aged 1 through 48 months. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:1625-1628 (Pubitemid 33035703)
10. Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, Friedman NE, Frane SL, Lin WK, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K. Refractive astigmatism and the toricity of ocular components in human infants. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:753-761 (Pubitemid 39363470)
11. Mutti DO. To emmetropize or not to emmetropize? The question for hyperopic development. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:97-102.
12. Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, Friedman NE, Frane SL, Lin WK, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K. Axial growth and changes in lenticular and corneal power during emmetropization in infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:3074-3080 (Pubitemid 44264290)
13. Schaeffel F, Glasser A, Howland HC. Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens. Vision Res 1988;28:639-657 (Pubitemid 18105483)
14. Irving EL, Sivak JG, Callender MG. Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992;12:448-456
15. Wildsoet C, Wallman J. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vision Res 1995;35: 1175-1194
16. Smith EL III, Hung LF. The role of optical defocus in regulating refractive development in infant monkeys. Vision Res 1999;39: 1415-1435
17. Graham B, Judge SJ. The effects of spectacle wear in infancy on eye growth and refractive error in the marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Vision Res 1999;39:189-206. (Pubitemid 29052368)
18. Norton TT, Siegwart JT Jr, Amedo AO. Effectiveness of hyperopic defocus, minimal defocus, or myopic defocus in competition with a myopiagenic stimulus in tree shrew eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4687-4699
19. Shen W, Sivak JG. Eyes of a lower vertebrate are susceptible to the visual environment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:4829-4837 (Pubitemid 351261004)
20. Wallman J, Wildsoet C, Xu A, Gottlieb MD, Nickla DL, Marran L, Krebs W, Christensen AM. Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res 1995;35:37-50. (Pubitemid 24347219)
21. Napper GA, Brennan NA, Barrington M, Squires MA, Vessey GA, Vingrys AJ. The duration of normal visual exposure necessary to prevent form deprivation myopia in chicks. Vision Res 1995;35: 1337-1344
22. Smith EL III, Hung LF, Kee CS, Qiao Y. Effects of brief periods of unrestricted vision on the development of form-deprivation myopia in monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:291-299 (Pubitemid 34113207)
23. Zhu X, Winawer JA, Wallman J. Potency of myopic defocus in spectacle lens compensation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44: 2818-2827 (Pubitemid 36759740)
24. Candy TR, Bharadwaj SR. The stability of steady state accommodation in human infants. J Vis 2007;7:4.1-16.
25. Tondel GM, Candy TR. Human infants' accommodation responses to dynamic stimuli. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:949-956 (Pubitemid 351260734)
26. Haynes H, White BL, Held R. Visual accommodation in human infants. Science 1965;148:528-530
27. Banks MS. The development of visual accommodation during early infancy. Child Dev 1980;51:646-666
28. Currie DC, Manny RE. The development of accommodation. Vision Res 1997;37:1525-1533
29. Braddick O, Atkinson J, French J, Howland HC. A photorefractive study of infant accommodation. Vision Res 1979;19:1319-1330
30. Brookman KE. Ocular accommodation in human infants. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983;60:91-99
31. Sokol S, Moskowitz A, Paul A. Evoked potential estimates of visual accommodation in infants. Vision Res 1983;23:851-860
32. Howland HC, Dobson V, Sayles N. Accommodation in infants as measured by photorefraction. Vision Res 1987;27:2141-2152
33. Green DG, Powers MK, Banks MS. Depth of focus, eye size and visual acuity. Vision Res 1980;20:827-835 (Pubitemid 10007703)
34. Gabriel GM, Mutti DO. Comparison of dynamic retinoscopy and binocular photoretinoscopy for measurement of accommodative response in infants. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:E-abstract 050033.
35. Mohindra I. A non-cycloplegic refraction technique for infants and young children. J Am Optom Assoc 1977;48:518-523 (Pubitemid 8090427)
36. Mohindra I. Comparison of "near retinoscopy" and subjective refraction in adults. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1977;54:319-322 (Pubitemid 8257897)
37. Mohindra I, Molinari JF. Near retinoscopy and cycloplegic retinoscopy in early primary grade schoolchildren. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1979;56:34-38
38. Borghi RA, Rouse MW. Comparison of refraction obtained by "near retinoscopy" and retinoscopy under cycloplegia. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985;62:169-172 (Pubitemid 15102617)
39. Saunders KJ, Westall CA. Comparison between near retinoscopy and cycloplegic retinoscopy in the refraction of infants and children. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:615-622
40. Birch EE, Swanson WH. Probability summation of acuity in the human infant. Vision Res 1992;32:1999-2003.
41. Gwiazda J, Bauer J, Thorn F, Held R. Development of spatial contrast sensitivity from infancy to adulthood: psychophysical data. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:785-789 (Pubitemid 27500244)
42. Rosenfield M, Portello JK, Blustein GH, Jang C. Comparison of clinical techniques to assess the near accommodative response. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:382-388 (Pubitemid 26238760)
43. Cox DR, Hinkley DV. Theoretical Statistics. London: Chapman and Hall; 1974.
44. Mayer DL, Beiser AS, Warner AF, Pratt EM, Raye KN, Lang JM. Monocular acuity norms for the Teller Acuity Cards between ages one month and four years. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36: 671-685
45. Salomao SR, Ventura DF. Large sample population age norms for visual acuities obtained with Vistech-Teller Acuity Cards. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:657-670
46. Walker TW, Mutti DO. The effect of accommodation on ocular shape. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:424-430
47. Bailey MD, Sinnott LT, Mutti DO. Ciliary body thickness and refractive error in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49: 4353-4360
48. Maino JH, Cibis GW, Cress P, Spellman CR, Shores RE. Noncycloplegic vs cycloplegic retinoscopy in pre-school children. Ann Ophthalmol 1984;16:880-882 (Pubitemid 15186309)
49. Owens DA, Mohindra I, Held R. The effectiveness of a retinoscope beam as an accommodative stimulus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1980;19:942-949 (Pubitemid 11041994)
50. Bullimore MA, Gilmartin B, Hogan RE. Objective and subjective measurement of tonic accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1986;6:57-62. (Pubitemid 16157536)
51. del Pilar Cacho M, Garcia-Munoz A, Garcia-Bernabeu JR, Lopez A. Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:650-655 (Pubitemid 29441938)