Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 76, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 650-655

  Del Pilar Cacho, Ma ^a   García Muñoz, Ángel ^b   García Bernabeu, José R ^b   López, Alberto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Accommodative lag; Accommodative lead; Accommodative response; Dynamic retinoscopy; Monocular estimate method; Nott retinoscopy

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR VISION; REFRACTIVE INDEX;

MONOCULAR ESTIMATE METHOD (MEM); NOTT DYNAMIC RETINOSCOPY;

OPTICAL TESTING;

ACCOMMODATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINOSCOPY;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; HUMANS; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; REFERENCE VALUES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; RETINA;

EID: 0344132616     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199909000-00023     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical Management of Binocular Vision: Heterophoric, Accommodative, and Eye Movement Disorders. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company 1994:19-26.
2. Rosenfield M, Portello JK, Blustein GH, Jang C. Comparison of clinical techniques to assess the near accommodative response. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:382-8.
3. Locke LC, Somers W. A comparison study of dynamic retinoscopy techniques. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66:540-4.
4. Rouse MW, London R, Allen DC. An evaluation of the monocular estimate method of dynamic retinoscopy. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1982;59:234-9.
5. Nott IS. Dynamic skiametry, accommodation and convergence. Am J Physiol Opt 1925;6:490-503.
6. Nott IS. Dynamic skiametry: Accommodative convergence and fusion convergence. Am J Physiol Opt 1926;7:366-74.
7. Borish IM. Dynamic skiametry. In: Borish IM, ed. Clinical Refraction, 3rd Ed. Chicago: Professional Press, 1975:697-713.
8. Grosvenor TP. Primary Care Optometry, 2nd Ed. Boston: Professional Press Books, 1989:251.
9. Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical Management of Binocular Vision: Heterophoric, Accommodative, and Eye Movement Disorders. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company 1994:41-81.
10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1: 307-10.
11. Campbell FW. The depth of field of the human eye. Optica Acta 1957;4:157-64.
12. Legge GE, Mullen KT, Woo GC, Campbell FW. Tolerance to visual defocus. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1987;4:851-63.