Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: A reporting model

Journal of Intellectual Capital

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 307-324

  Sáchez, M Paloma ^a   Elena, Susana ^b   Castrillo, Rocío ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Information disclosure; Intellectual capital; Management information; Research organizations; Universities

Indexed keywords

EID: 68049103060     PISSN: 14691930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14691930910952687     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Almqvist, R. and Skoog, M. (2007), Colliding discourses? New public management from an intellectual capital perspective, in Chaminade, C. and Catasus, B. (Eds), Intellectual Capital Revisited: Paradoxes in the Knowledge-intensive Organization, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
2. Altenburger, O.A. and Schaffhauser-Linzatti, M.M. (2006), The order on the intellectual capital Statements of Austrian universities, paper presented at the IFSAM - International Federation of Scholarly Associations of Management 8th World Congress, Berlin, 28-30 September.
3. Altenburger, O.A., Novotny-Farkas, Z. and Schaffhauser-Linzatti, M.M. (2006), Intellectual capital reports for universities; a trial intellectual capital report at the University of Vienna, paper presented at the 29th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association, University College Dublin, Dublin, 22-24 March.
4. Arviran, N.K. (2006), Modelling knowledge production performance of research centres with a focus on triple bottom line benchmarking, International Journal Business Performance Management, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 307-27.
5. Barzelay, M. (2001), The New Public Management. Improving Research and Policy Dialogue, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
6. Bonaccorsi, A. and Daraio, C. (2007),Theoreticalperspectivesonuniversitystrategy,inBonaccorsi, A. and Daraio, C. (Eds), Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation. Specialization and Performance in Europe, Prime Series, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 3-30.
7. Bontis, N. (2004), National intellectual capital index. A United Nations initiative for the Arab egion, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 13-39.
8. Borins, S. (1995), Summary: government in transition - a new paradim in public dministration, in Commonwealth Secretariat (Ed.), Proceedings of Government in ransition: The Inaugural Conference of the Commonwealth Association for Public Administration and Management, Toronto, pp. 3-23.
9. Borins, S. (2002), New public management, north-American style, in Mclaughlin, K., Osborne, S. and Ferlie, E. (Eds), The New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, Chapter 13, Routledge, London.
10. Cañibano, L. (2004), Información financiera y gobierno de la empresa, Revista Internacional Legis de Contabilidad y Auditoria, Vol. 19, pp. 157-235.
11. Cañibano, L.(2006), El concepto de imagen fiel y su aplicación en España, Partida Doble, No. 178, pp. 10-17.
12. Chatterton, P. and Goddard, J.B. (2003), The response of universities to regional needs, in Boekema, F., Kuypers, E. and Rutten, R. (Eds), Economic Geography of Higher Education: Knowledge, Infraestructure and Learning Regions, Routledge, London, pp. 19-41.
13. Chatzkel, J. (2006), The 1st world conference on intellectual capital for communities in the knowledge economy, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 272-782.
14. Comunidad de Madrid (2005), Modelo de Financiación de las Universidades Públicas de la Comunidad de Madrid, Consejería de Educación, Dirección General de Universidades e Investigación, Madrid.
15. Danish Trade and Industry Development Council (2003), Intellectual Capital Statements. The New Guidelines, The Danish Trade and Industry Development Council, Copenhagen.
16. Davies, I.C. (1999), Evaluation and performance management in government, Evaluation, Vol. 5 No. 5, pp. 150-9.
17. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S. and Thinkler, J. (2006), New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 467-94.
18. Elena, S. (2007), Governing the university of the 21th century: intellectual capital as a tool for strategic management: lessons from the European experience, Doctoral thesis, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, 17 July.
19. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (1996), Emergence of a triple helix of university industry government relations, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 23, pp. 279-86.
20. EUA (2005), Glasgow Declaration: Strong Universities for a Strong Europe, European University Association, Brussels, available at:www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/02-EUA/050415_EUA_GLASGOW_declaration.pdf(accessed 14 April 2008).
21. EUA (2007), Lisbon Declaration: Europe's Universities Beyond 2010: Diversity with a Common Purpose, European University Association, Brussels, available at: www.eua.be/fileadmin/ user_upload/files/Publications/Lisbon_declaration.pdf (accessed 14 April 2008).
22. European Commission (1978), Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 based on Article 54 (3) (g) of the Treaty on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, Official Journal of the European Commissions, No. L 222/11, 14-8-78.
23. European Commission (2006) Reporting Intellectual Capital to Augment Research, Development and Innovation in SMEs (RICARDIS), available at: www.ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/2006-2977_web1.pdf (accessed 14 April 2008).
24. Gibbons, M. (1998), Higher Education Relevance in the 21st Century, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
25. Gibbons, M., Limonges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Two, M. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage, London.
26. Guthrie, J., Carlin, T. and Yongvanich, K. (2004), Public sector performance reporting: the intellectual capital question?, MGSM Working Papers in Management, Macquarie Graduate School of Management, Sydney, available at: www.mgsm.edu.au/download. cfm?DownloadFile=59F2D8ED-C500-0F06-EB58FB4A7BB97329(accessed 14 April 2008).
27. Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (2005), Guidelines for Disclosure of Intellectual Assets Based Management, METI, Tokyo, October.
28. Larbi, G.A. (1999), The New Public Management Approach and Crisis States, DP 112, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva.
29. Laredo, A. (2007), Revisiting the third mission of universities: toward a renewed categorization of university activities?, Higher Education Policy, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 441-56.
30. Leitner, K.-H. (2004), Valuation of intangibles. Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities, Research Evaluation, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 129-40.
31. Leitner, K.-H. (2007), Intellectual capital reporting and evaluation in Austrian universities: relationshipsandcomplementarities,inZinöcker,K.,Neurath,W.T.,Schmid,M.andMayer,J. (Eds), Evaluation of Austrian Research and Technology Policy. A Summary of Austrian Evaluation Studies from2003to2007, PlatformResearchandTechnologyPolicyEvaluation and Austrian Council for Research and Technology Development, Vienna, pp. 97-105.
32. Leitner, K.-H. and Warden, C. (2004), Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organizations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 33-51.
33. Leitner, K.-H., Schaffhauser-Linzatti, M., Stowasser, R. and Wagner, K. (2005), Data envelopment analysis as method for evaluating intellectual capital, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 528-43.
34. Lev, B. (2001), Intangibles: Management, Measurement and Reporting, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, available at: www.baruch-lev.com/
35. Martin, B.R. (2003), The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university, in Geuna, A., Salter, J.A. and Steinmueller, W.E. (Eds), Science and Innovation. Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 7-29.
36. Meritum Protect (2002), Guidelines for Managing and Reporting on Intangibles, Intellectual Capital Report, Vodafone Foundation, Madrid.
37. Molas-Gallart, J. (2005), Defining, measuring and funding the third mission: a debate on the future of the university, Coneixement i Societat, Vol. 7, pp. 6-27.
38. Mouritsen, J., Thorbjornsen, S., Bukh, P.N. and Johansen, M.R. (2005), Intellectual capital and the discourses of love and entrepreneurship in new public management, Financial Accountability Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 279-90.
39. Mowery, D.C. and Sampat, B.N. (2004),TheBayh-DoleActanduniversity-industrytechnologytransfer: a model for OECD governments?, Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 115-27.
40. Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., Sampat, B.N. and Ziedonis, A.A. (2004), Ivory Tower and industrial innovation. University-industry technology transfer before and after Bayh-Dole Act, Stanford Business Book, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
41. OECD (2003), Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, OECD, Paris.
42. OECD (2004), On the Edge: Securing a Sustainable Future for Higher Education, Report of the OECD/IMHE-HEFCE Project on Financial Management and Governance of Higher Education Institutions, OECD, Paris, available at: www.oecd.org
43. OECD (2005), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation, 3rd ed., OECD, Paris.
44. OEU (2006), Methodological Guide, Final Report of the Observatory of the European University, PRIME Project, available at: www.prime-noe.org/index.php?project=prime&locale=en&level1=menu1_prime_1b8057d059a36720_21&level2=2&doc=Projects_Universities&page=3 (accessed 13 April 2008).
45. Pasher, E. (1999), The Intellectual Capital of the State of Israel, Kal Press, Herzlia Pituach.
46. Piber, M. and Pietsch, G. (2006), Performance measurement in universities: the case of knowledge balance sheets analyzed from a new institutionalism perspective, Performance Measurement and Management Control: Improving Organizations and Society Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, Vol. 16, pp. 379-401.
47. Rembe, A. (1999), Invest in Sweden: Report 1999, Halls Offset AB, Stockholm.
48. Sánchez, M.P. and Elena, S. (2006), Intellectual capital in universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 529-48.
49. Sánchez, M.P. Elena, S. and Castrillo, R. (2007), Informe sobre la gestión de la investigación y el gobierno de la universidad autónoma de Madrid. Internal Report, Universidad Auto ́noma de Madrid, Madrid.
50. Society for Knowledge Economy (2005), Australian guiding principles on extended performance management; a guide for better managing, measuring and reporting knowledge intensive organisational resources, paper presented at GAP Congress on Knowledge Capital, Society for Knowledge Economy, Melbourne.