Partisanship and policy choice: What's left for the left in Latin America?

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 29-41

  Kingstone, Peter ^a   Young, Joseph ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b Illinois University   (United States)

Author keywords

Global economy; Latin America; Neoliberal reform; Partisanship

Indexed keywords

EID: 67949119007     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1065912908314198     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Achen, Christopher H. 2000. Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, UCLA, July 20-22.
2. Armijo, Leslie. 2005. Mass democracy: The real reason that Brazil ended inflation ? World Development 33: (12). 2013-28
3. Avelino, George, David Brown, and Wendy Hunter. 2005. The effects of capital mobility, trade openness, and democracy on social spending in Latin America, 1980-1999. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3). 625-41.
4. Baker, Andy. 2005. Who wants to globalize? Consumer tastes and labor markets in a theory of trade policy beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 49 (4). 925-39.
5. Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review 89: 634-47.
6. Beck, Thorstern, George Clarke, Alberto Groff, Philip Keefer, and Patrick Walsh. 2001. New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15 (1). 165-76.
7. Biglaiser, Glen, and Michelle Danis. 2002. Privatization under democracy versus authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies 35 (1). 83-102.
8. Biglaiser, Glen, and Karl DeRouen. 2004. The expansion of neoliberal economic reforms in Latin America. International Studies Quarterly 48 (3). 561-78.
9. Boix, Carles. 1998. Political parties, growth and equality: Conservative and social democratic economic strategies in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Brown, David S., and Wendy A. Hunter. 1999. Democracy and social spending in Latin America, 1980-92. American Political Science Review 93 (4). 779-90.
11. Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, and Eric Tanenbaum. 2001. Mapping policy preferences: Estimates for parties, electors, and governments 1945-1998. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Casteneda, Jorge G. 2006. Latin America's left turn. Foreign Affairs. May/June.
13. Cohen, Benjamin. 1998. The geography of money. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14. Coppedge, Michael. 1997. A classification of Latin American political parties. Kellogg Institute Working Paper No. 244.
15. Corrales, Javier. 2000. Presidents, ruling parties, and party rules. Comparative Politics 32 (2). 127-50.
16. Corrales, Javier. 2006 a. The many lefts of Latin America. Foreign Policy. November/December.
17. Corrales, Javier. 2006 b. Hugo Boss. Foreign Policy. January/February.
18. Etchemendy, Sebastian. 2001. Constructing reform coalitions: The politics of compensations in Argentina's economic liberalization. Latin American Politics and Society 43 (3). 1-35.
19. Frieden, Jeffry. 1991. Invested interests: The politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance. International Organization 45 (4). 425-51.
20. Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan politics in the global economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Garrett, Geoffrey, and Peter Lange. 1991. Political responses to interdependence: "What's 'left' for the Left." International Organization 45 (4). 539-64.
22. Geddes, Barbara. 1995. The politics of economic liberalization. Latin American Research Review 30 (2). 195-214.
23. Golder, Matt. 2005. Democratic electoral systems around the world, 1946-2000. Electoral Studies 24 (1). 103-21.
24. Green, Duncan. 2003. Silent revolution: The rise and crisis and market economics in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.
25. Haggard, Stephen, and Robert Kaufman. 1995. The political economy of democratic transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Haggard, Stephan, and Mathew D. McCubbins, eds. 2001. Presidents, parliaments and policy. Cambridge, UK, and New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Hausmann, Ricardo, Michael Gavin, Carmen Pages-Serra, and Ernesto Stein. 1999. Financial turmoil and the choice of exchange rate regime. Working Paper No. 400. Washington DC: Inter-American Development Bank. http://www.iadb.org.
28. Kaufman, Robert, and Alex Segura-Ubiergo. 2001. Globalization, domestic politics and social spending in Latin America: A time-series cross-section analysis, 1973-1997. World Politics 53 (4). 553-87.
29. Marshall, Monty G., and Keith Jaggers. 2003. Polity IV Project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2003.
30. Martinez, Juan, and Javier Santiso. 2003. Financial markets and politics: The confidence game in Latin American emerging economies. International Political Science Review 24 3: 363-95.
31. Maxfield, Sylvia. 1998. Understanding the political implication of financial internationalization in emerging market countries. World Development 26 (7). 1201-19.
32. Montero, Alfred. 1998. State interests and the new industrial policy in Brazil: The privatization of steel, 1990-1994. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 40 (3). 27-62.
33. Morley, Samuel A., Roberto Machado, and Stefano Pettinato. 1999. Indices of structural reform in Latin America. ECLAC Serie Reformas Economicas 12. Santiago, Chile: ECLAC.
34. Murillo, Victoria. 2002. Political bias in policy convergence. Privatization choices in Latin America. World Politics 54 (4). 462-93.
35. Oatley, Thomas. 1999. How constraining is capital mobility? The partisan hypothesis in an open economy. American Journal of Political Science 43 (4). 1003-27.
36. Plmper, Thomas, and Vera E. Troeger. 2007. Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Political Analysis 15 (2). 124-39.
37. Rodrik, Dani. 1989. Promises, promises: Credible policy reform via signaling. Economic Journal, 99: 756-72.
38. Santiso, Javier. 2005. The political economy of emerging markets: Actors, institutions and financial crises in Latin America. New York: Palgrave.
39. Schamis, Hector. 1999. Distributional coalitions and the politics of economic reform in Latin America. World Politics 51 (2). 236-68.
40. Smith, Dale, Joseph K. Young, and Quan Li. 2005. The non-linear politics of capital liberalization in Latin America. Paper Presented at the 2005 Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association.
41. Stokes, Susan. 2001. Mandates and democracy: Neoliberalism by surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Strange, Susan. 1996. The retreat of the State: The diffusion of power in the global economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Strange, Susan. 1997. Casino Capitalism. University of Manchester Press.
44. Tornell, Aaron. 1995. Are economic crises necessary for trade liberalization and fiscal reform: The Mexican experience. In Reform, recovery, and growth: Latin America and the Middle East, ed. Rudiger Dornbusch and Sebastian Edwards. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. Weyland, Kurt. 2002. The politics of market reform in fragile democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Wibbels, Erik, and Moises Arce. 2003. Globalization, taxation, and burden-shifting in Latin America. International Organization 57: 111-35.