Design and standardisation of XBRL solutions for governance and transparency

International Journal of Disclosure and Governance

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 224-240

  Debreceny, Roger ^a   Piechocki, MacIej ^b   Felden, Carsten ^b   Gräning, André ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Disclosure; Metadata; Reporting value chain; Taxonomies; Transparency; XBRL

Indexed keywords

EID: 67849117037     PISSN: 17413591     EISSN: 17466539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jdg.2009.9     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Debreceny, R. and Gray, G.L. (2001) The production and use of semantically rich accounting reports on the Internet: XML and XBRL. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 2: 47-74.
2. Debreceny, R. S., Felden, C. and Piechocki, M. (eds.) (2007) New Dimensions for Business Reporting and XBRL. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
3. Williams, S.P., Scifl eet, P.A. and Hardy, C.A. (2006) Online business reporting: An information management perspective. International Journal of Information Management 26: 91-101.
4. Kernan, K. (2008) XBRL around the world. Journal of Accountancy 206: 62-66.
5. XBRL International. (2008) XBRL in Action. New York: XBRL International.
6. Cohen, E.E., Schiavina, T. and Servais, O. (2005) XBRL: The standardised business language for 21st century reporting and governance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 2: 368-394.
7. Piechocki, M. and Debreceny, R.S. (2009) The Impact of XBRL on the Financial Reporting Value Chain, Information Systems Section, American Accounting Association, Mid-Year Meeting, Charleston, NC.
8. Weitzel, T., Beimborn, D. and Koenig, W. (2006) A unifi ed economic model of standard diffusion: The impact of standardization cost, network effects, and network topology. MIS Quarterly 30: 489-514.
9. Farrell, J. and Saloner, G. (1985) Standardization, comparability and innovation. Rand Journal of Economics 16: 70-83.
10. Choi, J.P. (1997) Herd behavior, the 'penguin effect,' and the suppression of informational diffusion: An analysis of informational externalities and payoff interdependency. RAND Journal of Economics 28: 407-425.
11. Farrell, J. and Saloner, G. (1986) Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product pre-announcements, and predation. American Economic Review 76: 940-955.
12. Farrell, J. and Rabin, M. (1996) Cheap talk. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 103-118.
13. Troshani, I. and Rao, S. (2007) Drivers and inhibitors to XBRL adoption: A qualitative approach to build a theory in under-researched areas. International Journal of E-Business Research 3: 98-111.
14. Carayannis, E. and Sagi, J. (2001) 'New' vs. 'old' economy: Insights on competitiveness in the global IT industry. Technovation 21: 501-514.
15. Soekijad, M. and Andriessen, E. (2003) Conditions for knowledge sharing in competitive alliances. European Management Journal 21: 578-587.
16. Blind, K. (2007) Factors infl uencing the lifetime of telecommunication and information technology standards: Results of an explorative analysis of the PERINORM database. International Journal of IT Standards & Standardization Research 5: 1.
17. Blind, K. and Gauch, S. (2008) Trends in ICT standards: The relationship between European standardisation bodies and standards consortia. Telecommunications Policy 32: 503-513.
18. Markus, M.L. and Gelinas, U.J. (2006) Comparing the standards lens with other perspectives on IS innovations: The case of CPFR. International Journal of IT Standards & Standardization Research 4: 24.
19. Markus, L., Steinfi eld, C.W., Wigand, R.T. and Minton, G. (2006) Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action: The case of the US residential mortgage industry. MIS Quarterly 30: 439-465.
20. Nelson, M., Shaw, M. and Qualls, W. (2005) Interorganizational system standards development in vertical industries. Electronic Markets 15: 378-392.
21. Zhao, K., Xia, M. and Shaw, M. (2005) Vertical e-business standards and standards developing organizations: A conceptual framework. Electronic Markets 15: 289-300.
22. Hoffman, C. (2008a) Modeling Business Information Using XBRL: The Evolution of 'Patterns'. Tacoma, OR.
23. Hoffman, C. (2008b) XBRLS Business Use Cases Guide. Tacoma, OR.
24. Mylopoulos, J. (1998) Information modeling in the time of the revolution. Information Systems 23: 127-155.
25. Parsons, J. and Wand, Y. (2000) Emancipating instances from the tyranny of classes in information modeling. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 25: 228-268.
26. Thuraisingham, B. and Venkataraman, V. (1992) A new view of information modeling: A bridge between data and information. Information Systems Management 9: 29-36.
27. Lipinski, K. (2002) Lexikon der Datenkommu-nikation-IT- Studienausgabe. Bonn, Germany: MITP.
28. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2004) International Convergence of Capital Measurement. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.
29. COREP. (2008) Overview of the adoption of XBRL in Europe. Madrid: Committee of European Banking Supervisors. Technical Documentation.
30. COREP. (2007) COREP-FINREP Taxonomies. Madrid: Committee of European Banking Supervisors. Technical Documentation.
31. For our case study, we use the core COREP taxonomy 1.2.4 (2006-07-01), Finnish extension (2006-07-01), German extension 1.5 (2007-01), French extension 1.0.2 (2006-06-30) and Spanish extension (2007-01-01).
32. Details of the XBRL technology are beyond the scope of this paper.