Ultrasound-induced switching of sheetlike coordination polymer microparticles to nanofibers capable of gelating solvents

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 131, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1689-1691

  Zhang, Shiyong ^a   Yang, Shuaijun ^a   Lan, Jingbo ^a   Tang, Yurong ^a   Xue, Ying ^a   You, Jingsong ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COAGULATION; GELATION; NANOFIBERS; ORGANIC SOLVENTS; ULTRASONICS; ZINC;

COORDINATION POLYMERS; GELATION MECHANISMS; MICRO-PARTICLES;

ACOUSTIC WAVES;

NANOFIBER; POLYMER; SOLVENT; GEL; NANOMATERIAL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND; ZINC;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; GELATION; HYDROGEN BOND; IMMOBILIZATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PARTICLE SIZE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SYNTHESIS; ULTRASOUND; CHEMISTRY; GEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

GELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NANOSTRUCTURES; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PARTICLE SIZE; SOLVENTS; ULTRASONICS; X-RAY DIFFRACTION; ZINC;

EID: 67749113465     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja808210z     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Lehn, J.-M. Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and Perspectives: VCH: Weirtheim. 1995.
2. (b) Férev. G.; Mellot-Draznieks, C; Serre, C.; Millange. F. Ace. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 217.
3. (c) Hupp, J. T.; Poeppelmeier. K. R. Science 2005, 309, 2008.
4. (d) Kitagawa. S.; Kitaura. R.; Noro. S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2334.
5. (e) Yaghi, O. M.; O'Keeffe, M.; Ockwig, N. W.; Chae. H. K.; Eddaoudi. M.; Kim, J. Nature 2003, 423, 705.
6. (f) Forster, P. M.; Cheetham, A. K. Top. Catal. 2003, 24, 79.
7. A highlight article describing coordination chemistry as a rational design route toward gels, see: Fages, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1680.
8. For selected examples of coordination polvmer gels, see: (a) Leong, W. L.; Tarn, A, Y.-Y.; Batabval, S. K.; Koh, L. W.; Kasapis, S.; Yam. V. W.-W.; Vittal. J. J. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3628.
9. (b) Paulusse, J. M. J.; van Beek, D. J. M.; Sijbesma, R. P. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2392.
10. (c) Hui, J. K.-H.; Yu, Z.; MacLachlan, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7980.
11. (d) Wens. W.; Beck, J. B.; Jamieson, A. M.; Rowan, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11663.
12. (e) Beck, J. B.; Rowan, S. J. Am. Chem Soc. 2003, 125. 13922.
13. (f) Kim. H.-I; Lee, J.-H.; Lee. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5810.
14. (g) Kim, H.-I; Zin, W.-C; Lee, M. J.Am Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7009.
15. (h) Kuroiwa. K; Shibata. T.; Takada, A.; Nemoto, N.; Kimizuka. N. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2016.
16. (i) Roubeau. O.; Colin. A.; Schmitt, V.; Clérae. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3283.
17. (j) Xing, B.; Choi, M.-F.; Xu, B. Chem.-Eur. J. 2002, 8, 5028.
18. (k) Xing. B.; Choi, M.-F.; Xu, B. Chem. Commun. 2002, 362.
19. Zhang, S.; Yang. S.; Lan. J.; Yang, S.; You, J. Chem. Commun. 2008, 6170.
20. (a) George, M.: Weiss. R. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 489.
21. (b) Sanseetha, N. M.; Maitra, U. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 821.
22. (c) Estroff, L. A.; Hamilton, A. D. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1201.
23. (d) Van Bommel, K. J. C; Friggeri, A.; Shinkai. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 980.
24. Naota, T.; Koori, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9324.
25. For selected examples, see: (a) Bardelang, D.; Camerel, F.; Margeson. J. C; Leek, D. M.; Schmutz. M.; Zaman, M. B.; Yu, K.; Soldatov. D. V.; Ziessel, R; Ratcliffe. C. I.; Ripmeester, J. A J. Am Chem. Soc. 2008. 130, 3313.
26. (b) Wu, J.; Yi, T.; Shu. T.; Yu, M.; Zhou. Z.; Xu. M.; Zhou. Y.; Zhang, H.; Han, J.; Li, F.; Huang, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1063.
27. (c) Anderson, K. M.; Day, G. M.; Paterson. M. J.; Byrne, P.; Clarke, N.; Steed. J. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1058.
28. (d) Liu, J.; He. P.; Yan. J.; Fang. X.; Peng, J.; Liu, K.; Fang, Y. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 2508.
29. (e) Baddeley, C; Yan. Z.; King, G.; Woodward, P. M.; Badjić, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7270.
30. (f) Isozaki, K; Takava, H.; Naota, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2855.
31. (g) Paulusse, J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2334.
32. (h) Wang, C; Zhang, D.: Zhu, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16372.
33. (a) Paulusse. J. M. J.; Huijbers. J. P. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Chem.- Eur. J. 2006, 12, 4928.
34. (b) Paulusse. J. M. J.; Sijbesma, R. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4460.
35. (a) Jung, S.; Oh, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47. 2049.
36. (b) Imaz, I.; Maspoch, D.; Rodn guez-Blanco, C; Perez-Falcon, J. M.; Campo. J.; Ruiz- Molina, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1857.
37. (c) Jeon, Y.-M.; Armatas. G. S.; Heo, J.; Kanatzidis, M. G.; Mirkin, C. A. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 2105.
38. (d) Jeon, Y.-M.; Heo, J.; Mirkin, C. A. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7480.
39. (e) Maeda. H.; Hasegawa, M.; Hashimoto. T.; Kakimoto. T.; Nishio. S.; Nakanishi, T. J Am Chem. Soc. 2006,128, 10024.
40. (f) Rieter. W. J.; Taylor, K. M. L.; An, H.; Lin, W.; Lin, W. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9024.
41. (g) Wúrthner. F.; Stepanenko. V.; Sautter. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1939.
42. (h) Oh, M.; Mirkin, C. A. Nature 2005, 438, 651.
43. (i) Sun. X.; Dong, S.; Wang, E. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13102.
44. For preparation of bibp. see: Zhang. S.; Lan. J.; Mao. Z.; Xie. R.; You. J. Cryst. Growth Des. 2008, 9, 3134.
45. For crystallographic data, see: Supporting Information. Table S3.
46. The exact number of guest molecules in the crystallographic asymmetry unit can not be determined according to the Fourier electron densities due to disorder. However, the host framework can be located exactly.
47. (a) Klawonn, T.; Gansáuer, A.; Winkler, I.; Lauterbach, T.; Franke, D.; Nolte, R. J. M.; Feiters. M. C; Bóraer. H.; Hentschelc. J.; Dótz, K. H. Chem, Commun. 2007, 1894.
48. (b) Murata, K; Aoki, M.; Suzuki, T.; Harada, T.; Kawabata, H.; Komori, T.; Ohseto, F.; Ueda. K.; Shinkai. S. J. Am Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6664.
49. To obtain the clear TEM images of high resolution, the negative staining was adopted to provide contrast, while without staining no distinguishable structures were visible. The darker contrast in the outer region of the fibers should partially come from the inorganic staining. Therefore, although these fibers resemble tubes, we could not provide further technique to support their presence at this stage.
50. Sometimes micrometer-scale sheets were not completely transferred to fibers and could be observed from the xerogels accordingly.
51. The size of the proposed nanofibers is slightly lower than that observed in TEM experiments (ca. 3.0-4.0 nm). This difference could be easily explained by the negative staining, which makes the size of the fibers observed slightly higher than that of its real structure due to the coating of the contrasting reagent around the periphery of the fibers. While deducting the darker contrast in the outer region, a lighter region in the center of the observed fibers is ca. 1.5-2.2 nm, considered as the internal dimensions, which is roughly consistent with that of the proposed mode.
52. Metal-ligand interactions not only are thermodynamieally stable but also, depending on the metal ion and ligand used, can be kinetically labile. For a related description, see: (a) Kurth. D. G.; Higuchi, M. Soft Matter 2006, 2, 915.
53. (b) Yount. W. C; Loveless. D. M.; Craig, S. L. J Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14488.
54. (c) Loveless, D. M.; Jeon, S. L.; Craig. S. L. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 10171.
55. (d) Yount, W. C: Juwarker, II.: Craig, S. L. J Am Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15302.