The effects of abstraction on integrative agreements: When seeing the forest helps avoid getting tangled in the trees

Social Cognition

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 402-417

  Henderson, Marlone D ^a   Trope, Yaacov ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67749093564     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.3.402     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bazerman, M. H., Curhan, J. R., Moore, D. A., & Valley, K. L. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 279-314.
2. Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177-220.
3. Bumstein, E., & Schul, Y. (1982). The informational basis of social judgments: Memory for integrated and non-integrated trait descriptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 49-57.
4. Carnevale, P. J. (1992). The usefulness of mediation theory. Negotiation Journal, 8, 387-390.
5. Camevale, P.J., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (in press). Motive: The negotiator's raison d'être. In L. Thompson (Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology: Negotiation theory and research (pp. 55-76). New York: Psychology Press.
6. Druckman, D., & Broome, B. J. (1991). Value differences and conflict resolution: Familiarity or liking? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35, 571-593.
7. Druckman, D., Broome, B. J., & Korper, S. H. (1988). Value differences and conflict resolution: Facilitation or delinking? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 489-510.
8. Druckman, D., & Rozelle, R. M. (1975). Performance evaluation as a determinant of willigness to defend a counterattitudi-nal position. Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 243-252.
9. Esser, J. K., & Marriott, R. G. (1995). A comparison of the effectiveness of substantive and contextual mediation tactics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1340-1359.
10. Freitas, A. L., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Trope, Y (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739-752.
11. Froman, L. A., Jr., & Cohen, M. D. (1970). Compromise and logroll: Comparing the efficiency of two bargaining processes. Behavioral Science, 15, 180-183.
12. Greig, M. J. (2001). Moments of opportunity: Recognizing conditions of ripeness for international mediation between enduring rivals. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45, 691-718.
13. Grigsby, D. W., & Bigoness, W. J. (1982). Effects of mediation and alternative forms of arbitration on bargaining behavior: A laboratory study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 549-554.
14. Harinck, F., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2004). Negotiating interests or values and reaching integrative agreements: The importance of time pressure and temporary impasses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 595-611.
15. Henderson, M.D., Trope, Y., & Camevale, P.J. (2006). Negotiation from a near and distant time perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 721-729.
16. Johnson, M. D. (1984). Consumer choice strategies for comparing noncomparable alternatives. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 741-753.
17. Kelley, H. H. (1966). A classroom study of dilemmas in interpersonal negotiations. In K. Archibald (Ed.), Strategic intervention and conflict (pp. 49-73). Berkeley: University of California, Institute of International Studies.
18. Kelley, H. PL., & Schenitzki, D.P. (1972). Bargaining. In C. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 298-337). New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
19. Kenny, D., Kashy, D., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. The handbook of social psychology, Vols. 1 and 2 (4th ed.) (pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24-38.
21. Kolb, D. M. (1983). Strategy and the tactics of mediation. Human Relations, 36, 247-268.
22. Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Krug-lanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 353-383). New York: Guilford.
23. Lim, R. G., & Camevale, P. J. (1990). Contingencies in the mediation of disputes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 259-272.
24. Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Gentner, D. (1999). Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation. Psy-chonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 586-597.
25. Malkoc, S. A., Zauberman, G., & Ulu, C. (2005). Consuming now or later? The interactive effect of timing and attribute align-ability. Psychological Science, 16, 411-417.
26. Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 179-195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Northcraft, G. B., Brodt, S. E., & Neale, M. A. (1995). Negotiating with nonlinear subjective utilities: Why some concessions are more equal than others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 298-310.
28. O'Connor, K. M., & Carnevale, P. J. (1997). A nasty but effective negotiation strategy: Misrepresentation of a common-value issue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 504-515.
29. Okhuysen, G. A., Galinsky, A. D., & Uptigrove, T. A. (2003). Saving the worst for last: The effect of time horizon on the efficiency of negotiating benefits and burdens. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 269-279.
30. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation Behavior. New York: Academic.
31. Pruitt, D. G., & Camevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.
32. Pruitt, D. G., & Johnson, D. F. (1970). Mediation as an aid to face saving in negotiation. ]oumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 239-246.
33. Pruitt, D. G., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 621-633.
34. Reyna, V. R., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1-75.
35. Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B. (1978). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1995). Psychological barriers to dispute resolution. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 255-303.
37. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Schul, Y. (1983). Integration and abstraction in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 45-54.
39. Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.
40. Smith, E. E., Adams, N., & Schorr, D. (1978). Fact retrieval and the paradox of interference. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 438-464.
41. Smith, E. R. (1998). Mental representation and memory. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vols. 1 and 2, 4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
43. Thompson, L. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 515-532.
44. Thompson, L., & DeHarpport, T. (1998). Relationships, goal incompatibility, and communal orientation relationships in negotiations. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 20(1), 33-44.
45. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.
46. Wall, J. A., Jr. (1981). Mediation: An analysis, review, and proposed research. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25, 157-180.
47. Wall, J. A., Jr. (1984). Mediation: The effects of mediator proposals, number of issues, and altered negotiator aspirations. Journal of Management, 10, 293-304.
48. Wall, J. A., Jr., Stark, J. B., & Standifer, R. L. (2001). Mediation: A current review and theory development. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45, 370-391.
49. Weingart, L. R., Bennett, R. J., & Brett, J. M. (1993). The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 504-517.