Histological characteristics of sugar beet leaves potentially linked to drought tolerance

Industrial Crops and Products

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 281-286

  Luković, Jadranka ^a   Maksimović, Ivana ^b   Zorić, Lana ^a   Nagl, Nevena ^c   Perčić, Milorad ^b   Polić, Dubravka ^a   Putnik Delić, Marina ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOVI SAD   (Serbia)

^b FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE   (Serbia)

^c INSTITUTE OF FIELD AND VEGETABLE CROPS   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Cuticle; Drought; Epidermis; Leaf anatomy; Sugar beet

Indexed keywords

BREEDING MATERIALS; CONTROLLED CONDITIONS; CORRELATION MATRIX; CUTICLE; DEGREE OF VARIABILITY; DROUGHT TOLERANCES; EPIDERMAL TISSUES; EPIDERMIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPIC DIFFERENCES; GENOTYPIC VARIABILITY; HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES; HISTOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; IN-PLANT; LEAF ANATOMY; LIMITING FACTORS; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS; PLANT SURVIVAL; SEM; SEM ANALYSIS; SUGAR BEET GENOTYPES; WATER SHORTAGES; WATER STRESS; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

AGRONOMY; DROUGHT; PLANTS (BOTANY); PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SUGAR (SUCROSE); SUGAR BEETS; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

SUGARS;

ANATOMY; ASSESSMENT METHOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DROUGHT RESISTANCE; HISTOLOGY; LEAF; LIMITING FACTOR; SUGAR BEET; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS;

CALCULATION; GENETIC MODIFICATION; MORPHOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT MATERIAL; POLYSACCHARIDE; TEXTURE;

EID: 67651177409     PISSN: 09266690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aasamaa K., Niinemets U., and Sõber A. Leaf hydraulic conductance in relation to anatomical and functional traits during Populus tremula leaf ontogeny. Tree Physiol. 25 (2005) 1409-1418
2. Belhadj S., Derridj A., Aigouy T., Gers C., Gauquelin T., and Mevy J.P. Comparative morphology of leaf epidermis in eight populations of atlas Pistachio (Pistacia atlantica Desf., Anacardiaceae). Microsc. Res. Technol. 70 (2007) 834-846
3. Bloch D., and Hoffmann C. Seasonal development of genotypic differences in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and their interaction with water supply. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 191 (2005) 263-272
4. Boyer J.S. Advances in drought tolerance in plants. Adv. Agron. 56 (1996) 187-218
5. Bystrom B.G., Glater R.B., Scott F.M., and Bowler S.C. Leaf surface of Beta vulgaris-electron microscope study. Bot. Gaz. 129 (1968) 133-138
6. Čačić N., Kovačev L., Mezei S., Sklenar P., and Nagl N. Genotypic variation of root yields and sugar contetnt in sugar beet as related to drought tolerance. Proceedings: Drought and Plant Production. Agricultural Research Institute "Serbia" (1997) 493-497
7. Cameron K.D., Teece M.A., Bevilacqua E., and Smart L.B. Diversity of cuticular wax among Salix species and Populus species hybrids. Phytochemistry 60 (2002) 715-725
8. Cutler J.M., Rains D.W., and Loomis R.S. The importance of cell size in the water relations of plants. Physiol. Plant. 40 (1977) 255-260
9. Dickison W.C. Integrative Plant Anatomy (2000), Academic Press, San Diego
10. In: Esau K. (Ed). Plant Anatomy. (1965), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York/London/Sydney
11. Fahn, A., Cutler, D.F., 1992. Xerophytes. In: Braun, H.J., Carlquist, S., Ozenda, P., Roth, I., (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Plant Anatomy, XIII, 3. Gebrüder Borntraeger/Berlin/Stuttgart.
12. Grill D., Tausz M., Pöllinger U., Jimenez M.S., and Morales D. Effects of drought on needle anatomy of Pinus canariensis. Flora 199 (2004) 85-89
13. Hoffmann C.M., Huijbregtsb T., Noud van Swaaij, and Jansenc R. Impact of different environments in Europe on yield and quality of sugar beet genotypes. Eur. J. Agron. 30 (2009) 17-26
14. Jacobsen L.A., Agenbag L., Esler J.K., Pratt R.B., Ewers W.F., and Davis D.S. Xylem density, biomechanics and anatomical traits correlate with water stress in 17 evergreen shrub species of the Mediterranean-type climate region of South Africa. J. Ecol. 95 (2007) 171-183
15. Jaggard K.W., Dewar A.M., and Pidgeon J.D. The relative effects of drought stress and virus yellows on the yield of sugarbeet in the UK, 1980-1995. J. Agric. Sci. 130 (1998) 337-343
16. Jeffree C.E. The fine structure of the plant cuticle in biology of the plant cuticle. In: Riederer M., and Müller C. (Eds). Ann. Plant Rev. vol. 23 (2006), Blackwell Publishing pp. 11-36
17. Jong Kuk Na, B.S., 2005. Genetic Approaches to Improve Drought Tolerance of Tomato and Tobacco. Ph.D. Thesis. The Ohio State University, 93.
18. Joyce D.C., Aspinall D., and Edwards G.R. Water deficit and the growth and anatomy of the radish flesehy axis. New Phytol. 93 (1983) 439-446
19. Karbulkova J., Schreiber L., Macek P., and Santrucek J. Differences between water permeability of astomatous and stomatous cuticular membranes: effects of air humidity in two species of contrasting drought resistance strategy. J. Exp. Bot. 59 (2008) 3987-3995
20. Kenter C., and Hoffmann C. Impact of weather on yield formation of sugar beet in Germany. Advances in Sugar Beet Research 5 (2003), Institut International de Recherches Betteravières pp. 19-32
21. Kenter C., Hoffmann C., and Märländer B. Effects of weather variables on sugar beet yield development (Beta vulgaris L). Eur. J. Agron. 24 (2006) 62-69
22. Kerstiens G. Cuticular water permeability and its physiological significance. J. Exp. Bot. 47 (1996) 1813-1832
23. 2-Assimilation und Ertragsbildung der Zuckerr̈uben unter Feldbedingungen. Arch. Acker- Pflanzenb. Bodenkd. 29 (1985) 521-530
24. Maksimović I., Kastori R., Petrović N., Kovačev L., and Sklenar P. The effect of water potential on accumulation of some essential elements in sugarbeet leaves (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris). Proceedings for Natural Sciences, Matica Srpska Novi Sad, 104 (2003) 39-50
25. Martinez J.P., Silva H., Ledent J.F., and Pinto M. Effect of drought stress on the osmotic adjustment, cell wall elasticity and cell volume of six cultivars of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Eur. J. Agron. 26 (2007) 30-38
26. Martins M.B.G., and Zieri R. Leaf anatomy of rubber-tree clones. Sci. Agric. 60 (2003) 709-713
27. McGrath J.M., Derrico C.A., and Yu Y. Genetic diversity in selected, historical US sugarbeet germplasm and Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98 (1999) 968-976
28. Meinzer F.C. Coordination of vapour and liquid-phase water transport properties in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 25 (2002) 265-274
29. Merkulov Lj., Krstić B., Kovačev L., Ivezić J., and Pajević S. Source-sink relationship in sugar beet lines. Proceeding for Natural Sciences, Matica Srpska Novi Sad, 91 (1996) 73-81
30. Merkulov Lj., Ivezić J., Krstić B., Kovačev L., and Pajević S. Structural characteristics of leaf blade of differentially drought-tolerant sugar beet genotypes. Proceedings: Drought and Plant Production. Agricultural Research Institute "Serbia" (1997) 487-492
31. Ober E.S., and Luterbacher M.C. Genotipic variation for drought tolerance in Beta vulgaris. Ann. Bot. 89 (2002) 917-924
32. Petrović M., and Stikić R. Vodni režim šećerne repe. In: Spasić P., Tošić N., Dokić P., Kastori R., and Sekulić R. (Eds). Šećerna repa (1992), Jugošećer, Beograd 225-239 (in Serbian)
33. Pidgeon J.D., Werker A.R., Jaggard K.W., Richter G.M., Lister D.H., and Jones P.D. Climatic impact on the productivity of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Europe 1961-1995. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 109 (2001) 27-37
34. Pidgeon J.D., Ober S.E., Qi A., Clark J.A.C., Royal A., and Jaggard K.W. Using multi-environment sugar beet variety trials to screen for drought tolerance. Field Crops Res. 95 (2006) 268-279
35. Qi A., Kenter C., Hoffmann C., and Jaggard K.W. The Broom's Barn sugar beet growth model and its adaptation to soils with varied available water content. Eur. J. Agron. 23 (2005) 108-122
36. Ristic Z., and Cass D.D. Leaf anatomy of Zea mays L. in response to water shortage and high temperature: a comparasion of drought-resistant and drought-senzitive lines. Bot. Gaz. 152 (1991) 173-185
37. Salter P.J., and Goode J.E. Crop responses to water at different stages of growth. Farnham Royal (1967), Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau, United Kingdom
38. Schultz H.R., and Matthews M.A. Xylem development and hydraulic conductance in sun and shade shoots of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): evidence that low light uncouples water transport capacity from leaf area. Planta 190 (1993) 393-406
39. Steinrücken G. Prospects in sugar beet breeding. In: Biancardi E., Campbell L.G., Skaracis G.N., and De Biaggi M. (Eds). Genetics and Breeding of Sugar Beet (2005), Science Publishers Inc., Enfield, NH, USA 309-323
40. Steudle E., and Peterson C.A. How does water get through roots?. J. Exp. Bot. 49 (1998) 775-788
41. Thomas H. Drought resistance in plant. In: Basara A.S., and Basara R.K. (Eds). Mechanisms of Environmental Stress Resistance in Plants (1997), Harwood Academic Publishers
42. Thomas T., and Clarke N. Are sugar beet problems being watered down. Brit. Sugar Beet Rev. 3 (1995) 8-11
43. Visser H.R. Anatomisch-physiologische rasverschillen bij suikebieten (1951), Studiekring voor Plantenveredeling pp. 425-433
44. Wakabayashi K., Hoson T., and Kamisaka S. Changes in amounts and molecular mass distribution of cell-wall polysaccharides of wheat (Triticum aestivum L) coleoptiles under water stress. J. Plant Physiol. 151 (1997) 33-40
45. Wolf, L., 1954. Mikroskopická tehnika. Státni zdravotnické nakladatelstvi, Praha.