Use of a structural investigative protocol enhances the quality of investigative interviews with alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Britain

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 449-467

  Lamb, Michael E ^a   Orbach, Yael ^b   Sternberg, Kathleen J ^b   Aldridge, Jan ^c   Pearson, Sally ^c   Stewart, Heather L ^d   Esplin, Phillip W ^e   Bowler, Lynn ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^d Children's Justice Centre   (United States)

^e Department of Private Practice ^*  (United States)

^f Derbyshire Constabulary   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FORENSIC SCIENCE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OFFENDER; POLICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RECALL; STANDARDIZATION; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM; VICTIM;

EID: 67651173141     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1489     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children. (1990). Guidelines for psychosocial evaluation of suspected sexual abuse in young children. Chicago: Author.
2. Baker-Ward, L., Gordon, B. N., Ornstein, P. A., Larus, D. M.,&Clubb, P. A. (1993). Young children's long-term retention of a pediatric examination. Child Development, 64, 1519-1533.
3. Bjorklund, B., Douglas, R., Park, C., Nelson, L., Sanders, L., Gache, J., et al. (1997, April) When does misleading questioning cause children to change their minds as well as their answers? Paper Presented at the Society for Research in Child Development. Washington, DC.
4. Bourg, W., Broderick, R., Flagor, R., Kelly, D. M., Ervin, D. L., & Butler, J. (1999). A child interviewer's guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Brady, M., Poole, D. A., Warren, A., & Jones, D. (1999). Young children's responses to yes-or-no questions: Patterns and problems. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 47-57.
6. Bruck, M. (1999). A summary of an affidavit prepared for Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Cheryl Amirault LeFave. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 110-127.
7. Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., Francouer, E., & Renick, A. (1995). Anatomically detailed dolls do not facilitate preschoolers' reports of a pediatric examination involving genital touching. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 1, 95-109.
8. Bull, R. (1992). Obtaining evidence expertly: The reliability of interviews with child witnesses. Expert Evidence, 1, 5-12.
9. Bull, R. (1996). Good practice for video-recorded interviews with child witnesses for use in criminal proceedings. In G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMarran, & C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology, law, and criminal justice: International developments in research and practice (pp. 100-117). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
10. Cassel, W. S., Roebers, C. E. M., & Bjorklund, D. F. (1996). Developmental patterns of eyewitness responses to repeated and increasingly suggestive questions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 116-133.
11. Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children's testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Ceci, S. J., & Huffman, M. L. C. (1997). How suggestible are preschool children? Cognitive and social factors. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 948-958.
13. Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., & Toglia, M. P. (1987). Age differences in suggestibility: Narrowing the uncertainties. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 79-91). New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Cederborg, A.-C., Orbach, Y., Sternberg, K. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Investigative interviews of child witnesses in Sweden. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 1355-1361.
15. Craig, R. A., Sheibe, R., Kircher, J., Raskin, D. C., & Dodd, D. (1999). Effects of interviewer questions on children's statements of sexual abuse. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 77-85.
16. Criminal Justice Act. (1991). (http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/ acts1991/ukpa_19910053_on_1.htm) page published 29 August 2003.
17. Cyr, M., & Lamb, M. E. (2008). Assessing the effectiveness of the NICHD Interview Protocol when interviewing French-speaking alleged victims of sexual abuse in Quebec. Unpublished manuscript.
18. Dale, P. S., Loftus, E. F., & Rathbun, L. (1978). The influence of the form of the question on the eyewitness testimony of preschool children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7, 269-277.
19. Davies, G. M., Marshall, E., & Robertson, N. (1998). Child abuse: Training investigative officers (Police research series, No. 94). London: Home Office Police and Reducing Crime Unit.
20. Davies, G. M., & Westcott, H. L. (1999). Interviewing child witnesses under the memorandum of good practice: A research review. London: Home Office Police of Reducing Crime Unit.
21. Davies, G., Westcott, H., & Horan, N. (2000). The impact of questioning style on the content of investigative interviews with suspected child sexual abuse victims. Psychology, Crime and Law, 6, 81-97.
22. Dent, H. R. (1982). The effects of interviewing strategies on the results of interviews with child witnesses. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 279-297). Stockholm: Norstedt.
23. Dent, H. R. (1986). Experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning mentally handicapped child witnesses. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 13-17.
24. Dent, H. R., & Stephenson, G. M. (1979). An experimental study of the effectiveness of different techniques of questioning child witnesses. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 41-51.
25. Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
26. Goodman, G. S., & Aman, C. (1990). Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to recount an event. Child Development, 61, 1859-1871.
27. Goodman, G. S., & Reed, D. S. (1986). Age differences in eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 317-337.
28. Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Schwartz-Kenney, B. M., & Rudy, L. (1991). Children's testimony about a stressful event: Improving children's reports. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1, 69-99.
29. Hershkowitz, I. (2002). The role of facilitative prompts in interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 7, 63-71.
30. Hershkowitz, I. (2006). Delayed disclosure of alleged child sexual abuse victims in Israel. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 444-450.
31. Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Horowitz, D., & Hovav, M. (1998). Visiting the scene of the crime: Effects on children's recall of alleged abuse. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 195-207.
32. Home Office. (1992). Memorandum of good practice on video recorded interviews with child witnesses for criminal proceedings. London: Author, with Department of Health.
33. Home Office. (2002). Achieving the best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guidance for vulnerable and intimidated witnesses, including children. London: Author.
34. Hudson, J. A. & Fivush R. (Eds.), (1990). Knowing and remembering in young children. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35. Hutcheson, G. D., Baxter, J. S., Telfer, K., & Warden, D. (1995). Child witness statement quality: Question type and errors of omission. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 631-648.
36. Johnson, M. K., & Foley, M. A. (1984). Differentiating fact from fantasy: The reliability of children's memory. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 33-50.
37. Jones, D. P. H. (1992). Interviewing the sexually abused child. Oxford: Gaskell.
38. Korkman, J., Santtila, P., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2006). Dynamics of verbal interaction between interviewer and child in interviews with alleged victims of child sexual abuse. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 109-119.
39. Lamb, M. E., & Fauchier, A. (2001). The effects of question type on self contradiction by children in the course of forensic interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483-491.
40. Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Sternberg, K. J., Boat, B., & Everson, M. D. (1996). Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 1239-1247.
41. Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., Hovav, M., Manor, T., et al. (1996). Effects of investigative utterance types on Israeli children's responses. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 19, 627-637.
42. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P.W. (1998). Conducting investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22, 813-823.
43. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., & Esplin, P. W. (1999). Forensic interviews of children. In A. Memon, & R. A. Bull (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of interviewing (pp. 253-277). Chichester, England: Wiley.
44. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (2000). Effects of age and delay on the amount of information provided by alleged sex abuse victims in investigative interviews. Child Development, 71, 1586-1596.
45. Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., & Hershkowitz, I. (2002). The effects of forensic interview practices on the quality of information provided by alleged victims of child abuse. In H. L. Westcott, G. M. Davies, & R. Bull (Eds.), Children's testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (pp. 131-145). Chichester, England: Wiley.
46. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., Stewart, H., & Mitchell, S. (2003). Age differences in young children's responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 926-934.
47. Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). Structured forensic interview protocols improve the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse and Neglect, 31, 1201-1230.
48. Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Abbott, C. B. (2007). Does the type of prompt affect the accuracy of information provided by alleged victims of abuse in forensic interviews? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 1117-1130.
49. Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y.,Warren, A. R., Esplin, P.W., & Hershkowitz, I. (2007). Getting the most out of children: Factors affecting the informativeness of young witnesses. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F, Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), The Handbook of eyewitness psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 429-451). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
50. Marin, B. V., Homes, D. L., Guth, M., & Kovac, P. (1979). The potential of children as eyewitnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 295-305.
51. Memon, A., Wark, L., Holley, A., Bull, R., & Köhnken, G. (1996). Interviewer behavior in investigative interviews. Psychology, Crime and Law, 2, 135-155.
52. Milne, R., & Bull, R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
53. Oates, K., & Shrimpton, S. (1991). Children's memories for stressful and non-stressful events. Medical Science and Law, 31, 4-10.
54. Orbach, Y., & Lamb, M. E. (2001). The relationship between within-interview contradictions and eliciting interviewer utterances. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 323-333.
55. Orbach, Y., & Lamb, M. E. (2007). Young children's references to temporal attributes of allegedly experienced events in the course of forensic interviews. Child Development, 78, 1100-1120.
56. Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2000). Assessing the value of scripted protocols for forensic interviews of alleged abuse victims. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 733-752.
57. Ornstein, P. A., Gordon, B. N., & Larus, D. M. (1992). Children's memory for a personally experienced event: Implications for testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 49-60.
58. Pipe, M-E., Lamb, M.E., Orbach, Y., & Cederborg, A.-C. (Eds.). (2007). Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay and denial. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Poole, D. A., & Lamb, M. E. (1998). Investigative interviews of children: A guide for helping professionals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
60. Poole, D. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (1998). Assessing the accuracy of young children's reports: Lessons from the investigation of child sexual abuse. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 7, 1-26.
61. Poole, D. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (2002). Children's suggestibility in the forensic context. In M. L. Eisen, J. A. Quas, & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 355-381). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Robinson, J., & Briggs, P. (1997). Age trends and eye-witness suggestibility and compliance. Psychology, Crime and Law, 3, 187-202.
63. Saywitz, K. J., & Goodman, G. S. (1996). Interviewing children in and out of court: Current research and practice implications. In J. Briere, L. Berliner, J. A. Bulkley, C. Jenny, & T. Reid (Eds.), The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (pp. 297-318). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., & Hershkowitz, I. (1996). Child sexual abuse investigations in Israel. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 322-337.
65. Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Davies, G. A., & Westcott, H. L. (2001). The Memorandum of Good Practice: Theory versus application. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25, 669-681.
66. Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., & Mitchell, S. (2001). Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances young children's responses to free recall prompts in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 997-1005.
67. Thoresen, C., Lønnum, K., Melinder, A., Stridbeck, U., & Magnussen, S. (2006). Theory and practice in interviewing young children: A study of Norwegian police interviews 1985-2002. Psychology, Crime and Law. 12, 629-640.
68. Walker, N., & Hunt, J. S. (1998). Interviewing child-victim witnesses: How you ask is what you get. In C. R. Thompson, D. Herrman, J. D. Read, D. Bruce, D. Payne, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Eyewitness memory: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 55-87). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Walker, N. E., Lunning, S., & Eilts, J. L. Do children respond accurately to forced choice questions? Yes or no. Paper presented at Recollections of Trauma: Scientific Research and Clinical Practice, NATO Advanced Study Institute, Port de Bourgenay, France, June 1996.
70. Warren, A. R., Woodall, C. E., Hunt, J. S., & Perry, N. W. (1996). "It sounds good in theory, but": Do investigative interviewers follow guidelines based on memory research? Child Maltreatment, 1, 231-245.
71. Westcott, H. L. Jones J. (Eds.). (1997). Perspectives on the Memorandum: Policy, practice, and research on investigative interviewing. Aldershot, UK: Arena.
72. Yuille, J. C., Hunter, R., Joffe, R., & Zaparniuk, J. (1993). Interviewing Children in sexual abuse cases. In G. S. Goodman, & B. L. Bottoms (Eds.), Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony (pp. 95-115). New York: Guilford.