A comparison of three methods of pain control for posterior spinal fusions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 14, 2009, Pages 1499-1503

  Milbrandt, Todd A ^a,b   Singhal, Manuj ^b   Minter, Christin ^c   McClung, Anna ^d   Talwalkar, Vishwas R ^a,b   Iwinski, Henry J ^a,b   Walker, Janet ^a,b   Beimesch, Claire ^b   Montgomery, Christopher ^a,b   Sucato, Daniel J ^d,e  

^a Shriners Hospital for Children   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Continuous epidural infusion; Intrathecal morphine injection; Pain management; Patient controlled analgesia; Posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; HYDROMORPHONE; MORPHINE SULFATE;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; EPIDURAL CATHETER; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NAUSEA; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE TREATMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRURITUS; RESPIRATION DEPRESSION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCOLIOSIS; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; SPINE FUSION; VOMITING;

ADOLESCENT; ANALGESIA, EPIDURAL; ANALGESIA, PATIENT-CONTROLLED; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MORPHINE; NAUSEA; ORTHOPEDIC FIXATION DEVICES; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRURITUS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; TIME FACTORS; VOMITING;

EID: 67651163599     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a90ceb     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. O'Hara JF Jr, Cywinski JB, Tetzlaff JE, et al. The effect of epidural vs intravenous analgesia for posterior spinal fusion surgery. Paediatr Anaesth 2004;14:1009-1015 (Pubitemid 40023687)
2. Walson PD, Graves PS, Mortensen ME, et al. Patient-controlled versus conventional analgesia for postsurgical pain relief in adolescents. Dev Pharmacol Ther 1992;19:32-39
3. Van Boerum DH, Smith JT, Curtin MJ. Comparison of the effects of patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous opioids versus epidural analgesia on recovery after surgery for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2000;25:2355-2357
4. Sucato DJ, Duey-Holtz A, Elerson E, et al. Postoperative analgesia following surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia. Spine 2005;30:211-217 (Pubitemid 40348212)
5. Goodarzi M. The advantages of intrathecal opioids for spinal fusion in children. Paediatr Anaesth 1998;8:131-134 (Pubitemid 28128907)
6. Blackman RG, Reynolds J, Shively J. Intrathecal morphine: dosage and effi- cacy in younger patients for control of postoperative pain following spinal fusion. Orthopedics 1991;14:555-557
7. Goodarzi M, Shier NH, Grogan DP. Effect of intrathecal opioids on somato-sensory-evoked potentials during spinal fusion in children. Spine 1996;21:1565-1568 (Pubitemid 26242090)
8. Gall O, Aubineau JV, Bernière J, et al. Analgesic effect of low-dose intrathecal morphine after spinal fusion in children. Anesthesiology 2001;94:447-452 (Pubitemid 32198452)
9. Tripi PA, Poe-Kochert C, Potzman J, et al. Intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia in patients with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion. Spine 2008;33:2248-2251
10. Wong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs 1988;14:9-17.
11. Gulur P, Nishimori M, Ballantyne JC. Regional anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia, morbidity, and mortality. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2006;20:249-263 (Pubitemid 43811937)
12. Tziavrangos E, Schug SA. Regional anaesthesia and perioperative outcome. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006;19:521-525
13. Rosenberg PH. Future of regional anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49:913-918
14. Indelli PF, Grant SA, Nielsen K, et al. Regional anesthesia in hip surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;441:250-255
15. Stevens RA, Mikat-Stevens M, Flanigan R, et al. Does the choice of anesthetic technique affect the recovery of bowel function after radical prostatectomy? Urology 1998;52:213-218 (Pubitemid 28357822)
16. Blumenthal S, Min K, Marquardt M, et al. Postoperative intravenous morphine consumption, pain scores, and side effects with perioperative oral controlled-release oxycodone after lumbar discectomy. Anesth Analg 2007;105:233-237 (Pubitemid 46975870)
17. de Leon-Casasola OA, Karabella D, Lema MJ. Bowel function recovery after radical hysterectomies: thoracic epidural bupivacaine-morphine versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine: a pilot study. J Clin Anesth 1996;8:87-92. (Pubitemid 26073969)
18. Chaney MA. Side effects of intrathecal and epidural opioids. Can J Anaesth 1995;42:891-903.
19. Han DW, Hong SW, Kwon JY, et al. Epidural ondansetron is more effective to prevent postoperative pruritus and nausea than intravenous ondansetron in elective cesarean delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:683-687
20. Lockington PF, Fa'aea P. Subcutaneous naloxone for the prevention of intrathecal morphine induced pruritus in elective Caesarean delivery. Anaesthesia 2007;62:672-676
21. Gulhas N, Erdil FA, Sagir O, et al. Lornoxicam and ondansetron for the prevention of intrathecal fentanyl-induced pruritus. J Anesth 2007;21:159-163 (Pubitemid 46692007)
22. Iatrou CA, Dragoumanis CK, Vogiatzaki TD, et al. Prophylactic intravenous ondansetron and dolasetron in intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 2005;101:1516-1520