Integrating practices' change processes into improving quality of depression care

Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 351-357

  Main, Deborah S ^a,b   Graham, Deborah ^b   Nutting, Paul A ^c   Nease, Donald E ^d   Perry Dickinson, W ^e   Gallagher, Kaia ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS   (United States)

^c Center for Research Strategies LLC   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPRESSION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67651156303     PISSN: 15537250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35049-7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Martin J.C., et al.: Future of Family Medicine Project Leadership Committee: The future of family medicine: A collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam. Med 2(suppl.l):S3-S32, Mar.-Apr. 2004.
2. Blue Ribbon Panel of the Society of General Internal Medicine: Redesigning the practice model for general internal medicine: A proposal for coordinated care. J Gen Intern Med 22:400-409, Mar. 2007.
3. Jaen C.R., Stange K.C., Nutting P.A.: Competing demands of primary care: A model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. J Fam Pract 38:166-171, Feb. 1994.
4. Miller W.L., et al.: Understanding change in primary care practice using complexity theory. J Fam Pract 46:369-376, May 1998.
5. Miller W.L., et al.: Practice jazz: Understanding variation in family practices using complexity science. J Fam Pract 50:872-878, Oct. 2001.
6. Cohen D., et al.: A practice change model for quality improvement in primary care practice. J Healthc Manag 49:155-168, May-Jun. 2004.
7. Stroebel C.K., et al.: How complexity science can inform a reflective process for improvement in primary care practices. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 31:438-446, Aug. 2005.
8. Solberg L.I.: Improving medical practice: A conceptual framework. Ann Fam Med 5:251-256, May-Jun. 2007.
9. Nease D.E., et al.: Inducing sustainable improvement in depression care in primary care practices. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf '34:247-255, May 2008.
10. Kroenke K., Spitzer R.L., Williams J.B.: The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 16:606-613, Sep. 2001.
11. Wagner E.H., Austin B.T., Von Korff M.: Improving outcomes in chronic illness. Manag Care Q 4:12-25, Spring 1996.
12. Dietrich A.J., et al.: Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: Cluster randomised controlled trial. BM J 329:602, Sep. 11, 2004. Epub Sep. 2, 2004.
13. Nutting P.A., et al.: Implementing a depression intervention in five health care organizations: Experience from the RESPECT-Depression Trial. Adm Policy Ment Health 34:127-137, Mar. 2007. Epub Sep. 13, 2006.
14. VonKorff M.: Can care management enhance integration of primary and specialty care? BMJ 329:605, Sep. 11, 2004.
15. Crabtree B.E, Miller W.L.: Using codes and code manuals: A template organizing style of interpretation. In Crabtree B.E, Miller W.L. (eds.): Doing Qtialitative Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1999, pp. 163-167.
16. Addison R.B.: A grounded hermeneutic editing approach. In Crabtree B.E, Miller W.L. (eds.): Doing Qtialitative Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications: 1999, pp. 145-163.
17. Glaser B.G., Strauss A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qtialitative Research. Chicago Aldine Publishing Co., 1967.
18. Lincoln Y.S., Guba E.G.: Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1985.
19. Berwick D.M.: Disseminating innovations in health care [see comment]. JAMA 289:1969-1975, Apr. 16 2003.
20. Bradley E.H., et al.: A qualitative study of increasing beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction: Why do some hospitals succeed? JAMA 285:2604-2611, May 23-30, 2001.
21. Shortell S.M., Bennett C.L., Byck G.R.: Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: What it will take to accelerate progress [see comment]. Milbank Q 76(4):593-624, 1998.
22. Bradley E.H., et al.: Quality improvement efforts and hospital performance: Rates of beta-blocker prescription after acute myocardial infarction. Med Care 43:282-292, Mar. 2005.
23. Schonlau M., et al.: Evaluation of a quality improvement collaborative in asthma care: Does it improve processes and outcomes of care? Ann Fam Med 3:200-208, May-Jun. 2005.
24. Landon B.E., et al.: Effects of a quality improvement collaborative on the outcome of care of patients with HIV infection: The EQHIV study. Ann Intern Med 140:887-896, Jun. 1, 2004.
25. Katzelnick D.J., et al.: Applying depression-specific change concepts in a collaborative breakthrough series. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 31:386-397, Jul. 2005.
26. Meredith L.S., et al.: Implementation and maintenance of quality improvement for treating depression in primary care. Psychiatr Serv 57:48-55, Jan. 2006.
27. Shadish W.R., Cook T.D., Campbell D.T.: Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002.
28. Kairys J., et al.: Assessing diversity and quality in primary care through the Multimethod Assessment Process (MAP). Quality Management in Health Care 10:1-14, Summer 2002.