Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of citation database interfaces: A replication

Electronic Library

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 31-42

  Lin, Pei Chun ^a   Chou, Yu Hwa ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b Adv Intl Multitech Co Ltd   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Databases; User interfaces

Indexed keywords

EID: 67651151501     PISSN: 02640473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02640470910934579     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Agrawal, R. and Prasad, J. (1997), "The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntaries in the acceptance of information technologies", Decisions Sciences Journal, Vol. 28, pp. 557-82.
2. Atkinson,M.A. and Kydd, C. (1997), "Individual characteristics associated with world wide web use: An empirical study of playfulness and motivation", ACM SIGMIS Database, Vol. 28, pp. 53-62.
3. Calisir, F. and Calisir, F. (2004), "The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems", Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 20, pp. 505-15.
4. Cheng, T.C.E., Lam, D.Y.C. and Yeung, A.C.L. (2006), "Adoption of internet banking: An empirical study in Hong Kong", Decision Support Systems, Vol. 42, pp. 1558-72.
5. Chin, W.W. and Todd, P.A. (1995), "On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, pp. 237-46.
6. Choong, Y.Y. and Salvendy, G. (1999), "Implications for design of computer interfaces for Chinese users in mainland China", International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 11, pp. 29-46.
7. Davis, F.D. (1986), "A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results", PhD thesis, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
8. Davis, F.D. (1989), "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, pp. 319-40.
9. Davis, F.D. (1993), "User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts", International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Vol. 38, pp. 475-87.
10. Davis, F.D. and Venkatesh, V. (1995), "Measuring user acceptance of emerging information technologies: An assessment of possible method biases", Proceedings of the 28th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI, January 3-6, pp. 729-36.
11. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989), "User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models", Management Science, Vol. 35, pp. 982-1003.
12. Fenech, T. (1998), "Using perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness to predict acceptance of the world wide web", Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, Vol. 30, pp. 629-30.
13. Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. (1997), "Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, pp. 389-400.
14. Hert, C.A., Jacob, E.K. and Dawson, P. (2000), "A usability assessment of online indexing structures in the networked environment", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 51, pp. 971-88.
15. Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1989), LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications, SPSS, Chicago, IL.
16. King, W.R. and He, J. (2006), "A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model", Information & Management, Vol. 43, pp. 740-55.
17. Lau, W.C., Shih, H.M. and Goonetilleke, R.S. (2000), "Effect of cultural background when searching Chinese menus", in Lim, K.Y. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 4th APCHI/6th SEAES Conference 2000, Singapore, November 28-December 1, pp. 237-43.
18. Lederer, A.L., Maupin, D.J., Sena, M.P. and Zhuang, Y. (2000), "The technology acceptance model and the world wide web", Decision Support Systems, Vol. 29, pp. 269-82.
19. Lu, J., Yu, C.S., Liu, C. and Yao, J.E. (2003), "Technology acceptance model for wireless internet", Internet Research, Vol. 13, pp. 206-22.
20. Morris, M.G. and Dillon, A. (1997), "How user perceptions influence software use", IEEE Software, Vol. 14, pp. 58-65.
21. Norlin, E. and Winters, C.M. (2002), Usability Testing for Library Web Sites, American Library Association, Chicago, IL.
22. Ong, C.S. and Lai, J.Y. (2006), "Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance", Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 22, pp. 816-29.
23. Park, S. (2000), "Usability, user preferences, effectiveness, and user behaviors when searching individual and integrated full-text databases: Implications for digital libraries", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 51, pp. 456-68.
24. Pavlou, P.A. (2003), "Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model", International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 7, pp. 101-34.
25. Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H. and Pahnila, S. (2004), "Consumer acceptance of online banking: An extension of the technology acceptance model", Internet Research, Vol. 14, pp. 224-35.
26. Saad, R. and Bahli, B. (2005), "The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model", Information & Management, Vol. 42, pp. 317-27
27. Schmidt, C.T. (1997), "The systemics of dialogism: On the prevalence of the self in HCI design", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 48, pp. 1073-81.
28. Shiri, A. and Revie, C. (2005), "Usability and user perceptions of a thesaurus-enhanced search interface", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 61, pp. 640-56.
29. Spink, A. (2002), "A user-centered approach to evaluating human interaction with web search engines: An exploratory study", Information Processing and Management, Vol. 38, pp. 401-26.
30. Subramanian, G.H. (1994), "A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement", Decision Sciences, Vol. 25, pp. 863-74.
31. Szajna, B. (1996), "Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model", Management Science, Vol. 42, pp. 85-92.
32. Teo, T.S.H., Lim, V.K.G. and Lai, R.Y.C. (1999), "Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in internet usage", Omega, Vol. 27, pp. 25-37.
33. Venkatesh, V. (2000), "Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model", Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, pp. 342-65.
34. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (1994), "Modeling the determinants of perceived ease of use", Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Systems, Vilamoura, Portugal, November 28-30, pp. 213-27.
35. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000), "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies", Management Science, Vol. 46, pp. 186-204.
36. Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G. (2000), "Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, pp. 115-39.
37. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G. and Ackerman, P.L. (2000), "A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 83, pp. 33-60.
38. Vijayasarathy, L.R. (2004), "Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: The case for an augmented technology acceptance model", Information & Management, Vol. 41, pp. 747-62.