Generic Planning Target Margin for Rectal Cancer Treatment Setup Variation

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1470-1475

  Robertson, John M ^a   Campbell, Jonathon P ^a   Yan, Di ^a  

^a WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Rectal cancer; Setup variation; Treatment planning

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED TREATMENT; BODY MASS INDEX; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCAN; DIGITALLY RECONSTRUCTED RADIOGRAPHS; FOUR-PARAMETER MODEL; IMAGING DEVICE; PEARSON CORRELATION; PLANNING TARGET VOLUMES; PRONE POSITION; RADIATION THERAPY; RECTAL CANCER; SETUP VARIATION; SMALL BOWEL; T-TESTS; TREATMENT PLANNING;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE REGISTRATION; RADIOGRAPHY; TARGETS;

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RECTUM CANCER; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BODY MASS INDEX; BODY WEIGHT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMOBILIZATION; INTESTINE, SMALL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRONE POSITION; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 67651100578     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Robertson J.M., Lockman D., Yan D., et al. The dose-volume relationship of small bowel irradiation and acute grade 3 diarrhea during chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70 (2008) 413-418
2. Gunderson L.L., Russell A.H., Llewellyn H.J., et al. Treatment planning for colorectal cancer: Radiation and surgical techniques and value of small-bowel films. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11 (1985) 1379-1393
3. Das I.J., Lanciano R.M., Movsas B., et al. Efficacy of a belly board device with CT-simulation in reducing small bowel volume within pelvic irradiation fields. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 39 (1997) 67-76
4. Koelbl O., Richter S., and Flentje M. Influence of patient positioning on dose-volume histogram and normal tissue complication probability for small bowel and bladder in patients receiving pelvic irradiation: A prospective study using a 3D planning system and a radiobiological model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45 (1999) 1193-1198
5. Shanahan T.G., Mehta M.P., Bertelrud K.L., et al. Minimization of small bowel volume within treatment fields utilizing customized "belly boards". Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19 (1990) 469-476
6. Huh S.J., Lim D.H., Ahn Y.C., et al. Effect of customized small bowel displacement system in pelvic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40 (1998) 623-627
7. Nuyttens J.J., Robertson J.M., Yan D., et al. The influence of small bowel motion on both a conventional three-field and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for rectal cancer. Cancer/Radiotherapie 8 (2004) 297-304
8. Guerrero Urbano M.T., Henrys A.J., Adams E.J., et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer reduces volume of bowel treated to high dose levels. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65 (2006) 907-916
9. Kim J.Y., Kim D.Y., Kim T.H., et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with a belly board for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 22 (2007) 373-379
10. Duthoy W., De Gersem W., Vergote K., et al. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60 (2004) 794-806
11. Hurkmans C.W., Remeijer P., Lebesque J.V., et al. Set-up verification using portal imaging;review of current clinical practice. Radiother Oncol 58 (2001) 105-120
12. Yan D., Lockman D., Martinez A., et al. Computed tomography guided management of interfractional patient variation. Semin Radiat Oncol 15 (2005) 168-179
13. Nuyttens J.J., Robertson J.M., Yan D., et al. The variability of the clinical target volume for rectal cancer due to internal organ motion during adjuvant treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53 (2002) 497-503
14. Goitein M. Calculation of the uncertainty in the dose delivered during radiation therapy. Med Phys 12 (1985) 608-612
15. Stroom J.C., de Boer H.C.J., Huizenga H., et al. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43 (1999) 905-919
16. van Herk M., Remeijer P., Rasch C., et al. The probability of correct target dosage: Dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47 (2000) 1121-1135
17. Yan D., Lockman D., Brabbins D., et al. An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 48 (2000) 289-302
18. Allal A.S., Bischof S., and Nouet P. Impact of the "belly board" device on treatment reproducibility in preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 178 (2002) 259-262
19. Mitine C., Hoornaert M.T., Dutreix A., et al. Radiotherapy of pelvic malignancies: Impact of two types of rigid immobilisation devices on localisation errors. Radiother Oncol 52 (1999) 19-27
20. El-Gayed A.A.H., Bel A., Vijlbrief R., et al. Time trend of patient setup deviations during pelvic irradiation using electronic portal imaging. Radiother Oncol 26 (1993) 162-171
21. Tinger A., Michalski J.M., Bosch W.R., et al. An analysis of intratreatment and intertreatment displacements in pelvic radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 34 (1996) 683-690
22. Olofsen-van Acht M., van den Berg H., Quint S., et al. Reduction in irradiated small bowel volume and accurate patient positioning by use of a bellyboard device in pelvic radiotherapy of gynecological cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 59 (2001) 87-93
23. Taylor A., Rockall A.G., Reznek R.H., et al. Mapping pelvic lymph nodes: Guidelines for delineation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63 (2005) 1604-1612
24. Shih H.A., Harisinghani M., Zietman A.L., et al. Mapping of nodal disease in locally advanced prostate cancer: Rethinking the clinical target volume for pelvic nodal irradiation based on vascular rather than bony anatomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63 (2005) 1262-1269
25. Sauer R., Becker H., Hohenberger W., et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351 (2004) 1731-1740
26. Yan D., Wong J., Vicini F., et al. Adaptive modification of treatment planning to minimize the deleterious effects of treatment setup errors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38 (1997) 197-206
27. Bayley A.J., Catton C.N., Haycocks T., et al. A randomized trial of supine vs. prone positioning in patients undergoing escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 70 (2004) 37-44
28. Adli M., Mayr N.A., Kaiser H.S., et al. Does prone positioning reduce small bowel dose in pelvic radiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gynecologic cancer?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 (2003) 230-238
29. Martin J., Fitzpatrick K., Horan G., et al. Treatment with a belly-board device significantly reduces the volume of small bowel irradiated and results in low acute toxicity in adjuvant radiotherapy for gynecologic cancer: Results of a prospective study. Radiother Oncol 74 (2005) 267-274
30. Nuyttens J.J., Robertson J.M., Yan D., et al. The position and volume of the small bowel during adjuvant radiation therapy for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51 (2001) 1271-1280
31. Hida JI., Yasutomi M., Fujimoto K., et al. Analysis of regional lymph node metastases from rectal carcinoma by the clearing method. Justification of the use of sigmoid colon in J-pouch construction after low anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum 39 (1996) 1282-1285
32. Hocht S., Hammad R., Thiel HJ., et al. Recurrent rectal cancer within the pelvis. A multicenter analysis of 123 patients and recommendations for adjuvant radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 180 (2004) 15-20
33. Hruby G., Barton M., Miles S., et al. Sites of local recurrence after surgery, with or without chemotherapy, for rectal cancer: Implications for radiotherapy field design. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55 (2003) 138-143