Correlation of aberrometry, contrast sensitivity, and subjective symptoms with quality of vision after LASIK

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 559-568

  Bühren, Jens ^a,b   Martin, Tim ^b   Kühne, Anja ^a   Kohnen, Thomas ^a,c  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^c CULLEN EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABERROMETRY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLURRED VISION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EYE REFRACTION; GLARE; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; KERATOMILEUSIS; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; MYOPIA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAMETER; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; PUPIL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPECTACLES; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORNEA; GLARE; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; LASERS, EXCIMER; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; PSYCHOPHYSICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67651067981     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20090610-01     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Kohnen T. Measuring vision in refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1897-1898.
2. Mamalis N. Quality of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:529-530.
3. Pepose JS, Applegate RA. Making sense out of wavefront sensing. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:335-343.
4. Piermarocchi S, Sartore M, Bandello F, Lanzetta P, Brancato R, Garattini L, Lumbroso B, Rispoli M, Pece A, Isola V, Pulazzini A, Menchini U, Virgili G, Tedeshe M, Varano M. Quality of vision: a consensus building initiative for a new ophthalmologic concept. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006;16:851-860. (Pubitemid 46174400)
5. McLeod SD. Beyond Snellen acuity: the assessment of visual function after refractive surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1371-1373.
6. Pesudovs K, Marsack JD, Donnelly WJ III, Thibos LN, Applegate RA. Measuring visual acuity-mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters? J Refract Surg. 2004;20:S508-S514. (Pubitemid 39299551)
7. Holladay JT, Dudeja DR, Chang J. Functional vision and corneal changes after laser in situ keratomileusis determined by contrast sensitivity, glare testing, and corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:663-669. (Pubitemid 29222597)
8. Mutyala S, McDonald MB, Scheinblum KA, Ostrick MD, Brint SF, Thompson H. Contrast sensitivity evaluation after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1864-1867. (Pubitemid 30769627)
9. Lee YC, Hu FR, Wang IJ. Quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis: influence of dioptric correction and pupil size on visual function. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:769-777.
10. Quesnel NM, Lovasik JV, Ferremi C, Boileau M, Ieraci C. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and the contrast sensitivity function. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1209-1218. (Pubitemid 38748433)
11. Lee HK, Choe CM, Ma KT, Kim EK. Measurement of contrast sensitivity and glare under mesopic and photopic conditions following wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK surgery. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:647-655.
12. Yamane N, Miyata K, Samejima T, Hiraoka T, Kiuchi T, Okamoto F, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Oshika T. Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3986-3990. (Pubitemid 39411151)
13. Liang J, Grimm B, Goelz S, Bille JF. Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor. J Opt Soc Am A. 1994;11:1949-1957.
14. Charman WN. Wavefront technology: past, present and future. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2005;28:75-92. (Pubitemid 40668453)
15. Guirao A, González C, Redondo M, Geraghty E, Norrby S, Artal P. Average optical performance of the human eye as a function of age in a normal population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:203-223. (Pubitemid 29029590)
16. Seiler T, Kaemmerer M, Mierdel P, Krinke HE. Ocular optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:17-21. (Pubitemid 30036431)
17. Guirao A, Williams DR, Cox IG. Effect of rotation and translation on the expected benefit of an ideal method to correct the eye's higher-order aberrations. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2001;18:1003-1015.
18. Mihashi T. Higher-order wavefront aberrations induced by small ablation area and sub-clinical decentration in simulated corneal refractive surgery using a perturbed schematic eye model. Semin Ophthalmol. 2003;18:41-47. (Pubitemid 36993553)
19. Kohnen T, Bühren J, Kühne C, Mirshahi A. Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year followup: clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2175-2185. (Pubitemid 39575586)
20. Bühren J, Kühne C, Kohnen T. Influence of pupil and optical zone diameter on higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:2272-2280. (Pubitemid 43212914)
21. Twa MD, Lembach RG, Bullimore MA, Roberts C. A prospective randomized clinical trial of laser in situ keratomileusis with two different lasers. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:173-183. (Pubitemid 41125794)
22. Ortiz D, Alió JL, Illueca C, Mas D, Sala E, Pérez J, Espinosa J. Optical analysis of presbyLASIK treatment by a light propagation algorithm. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:39-44. (Pubitemid 46122695)
23. Brunette I, Gresset J, Boivin JF, Boisjoly H, Makni H. Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 1: development and validation of a survey questionnaire. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1783-1789. (Pubitemid 30828472)
24. Fraenkel G, Comaish F, Lawless MA, Kelly MR, Dunn SM, Byth K, Webber SK, Sutton GL, Rogers CM. Development of a questionnaire to assess subjective vision score in myopes seeking refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:10-19. (Pubitemid 38101577)
25. Hadden OB, Ring CP, Morris AT, Elder MJ. Visual, refractive, and subjective outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia of 6 to 10 diopters using the Nidek laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:936-942.
26. Dick HB, Krummenauer F, Schwenn O, Krist R, Pfeiffer N. Objective and subjective evaluation of photic phenomena after monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1878-1886.
27. Hersh PS, Steinert RF, Brint SF. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of optical side effects. Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:925-933.
28. Schallhorn SC, Kaupp SE, Tanzer DJ, Tidwell J, Laurent J, Bourque LB. Pupil size and quality of vision after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1606-1614. (Pubitemid 36962498)
29. Tahzib NG, Bootsma SJ, Eggink FA, Nuijts RM. Functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1943-1951. (Pubitemid 41773167)
30. Tahzib NG, Bootsma SJ, Eggink FA, Nuijts RM. Functional outcome and patient satisfaction after Artisan phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:31-39.
31. Tuan KM. Visual experience and patient satisfaction with wavefront- guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:577-583.
32. Applegate RA, Howland HC, Sharp RP, Cottingham AJ, Yee RW. Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. J Refract Surg. 1998;14:397-407. (Pubitemid 28350703)
33. Applegate RA, Hilmantel G, Howland HC, Tu EY, Starck T, Zayac EJ. Corneal first surface optical aberrations and visual performance. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:507-514. (Pubitemid 30769672)
34. Oshika T, Okamoto C, Samejima T, Tokunaga T, Miyata K. Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations in normal human eyes. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1807-1812. (Pubitemid 44442434)
35. Pesudovs K, Coster DJ. Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: the nexus between corneal wavefront aberrations and visual performance. J Refract Surg. 2006;22:926-931. (Pubitemid 44764579)
36. Schallhorn SC, Blanton CL, Kaupp SE, Sutphin J, Gordon M, Goforth H Jr, Butler FK Jr. Preliminary results of photorefractive keratectomy in active-duty United States Navy personnel. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:5-22. (Pubitemid 26051493)
37. Chalita MR, Chavala S, Xu M, Krueger RR. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:447-453. (Pubitemid 38293097)
38. Bühren J, Strenger A, Martin T, Kohnen T. Wavefront aberrations and subjective quality of vision after wavefront-guided LASIK: first results. Ophthalmologe. 2007;104:688-696.
39. Kohnen T, Bühren J, Kasper T, Terzi E. Quality of vision after refractive surgery. In: Kohnen T, Koch DD, eds. Cataract and Refractive Surgery. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2004:303-314.
40. Kohnen T, Kühne C, Cichocki M, Strenger A. Cyclorotation of the eye in wavefront-guided LASIK using a static eyetracker with iris recognition. Ophthalmologe. 2007;104:60-65. (Pubitemid 46183582)
41. Thibos LN, Applegate RA, Schwiegerling JT, Webb R. Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:S652-S660.
42. Bach M. The Freiburg Visual Acuity test - automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:49-53. (Pubitemid 26041318)
43. Terzi E, Bühren J, Wesemann W, Kohnen T. Frankfurt-Freiburg Contrast and Acuity Test System (FF-CATS). A new test to determine contrast sensitivity under variable ambient and glare luminance levels. Ophthalmologe. 2005;102:507-513.
44. Bühren J, Terzi E, Bach M, Wesemann W, Kohnen T. Measuring contrast sensitivity under different lighting conditions: comparison of three tests. Optom Vis Sci. 2006;83:290-298. (Pubitemid 43804567)
45. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ. Designing a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci. 1988;2:187-199.
46. Elliott DB, Bullimore MA. Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:108-119.
47. Schmidt GW, Yoon M, McGwin G, Lee PP, McLeod SD. Evaluation of the relationship between ablation diameter, pupil size, and visual function with vision-specific quality-of-life measures after laser in situ keratomileusis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:1037-1042. (Pubitemid 47260534)
48. Rabin J, Wicks J. Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: the small letter contrast test. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:398-403. (Pubitemid 26238762)
49. Murray IJ, Parry NR, Ritchie SI, Bremner RE, Brahma A, Ikram K, Tahir HJ. Importance of grating orientation when monitoring contrast sensitivity before and after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:551-556.
50. Pesudovs K, Hazel CA, Doran RM, Elliott DB. The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:11-16. (Pubitemid 38091351)