Measurement of contrast sensitivity and glare under mesopic and photopic conditions following wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK surgery

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 647-655

  Lee, Hyung Keun ^a,c   Choe, Chul Myung ^b   Ma, Kyoung Tak ^a   Kim, Eung Kweon ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b ALC Ophthalmology Clinic   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; GLARE; HALO EFFECT; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; KERATOMILEUSIS; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHOTOPIC VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REFRACTION ERROR; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

EID: 33748629902     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081-597x-20060901-05     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Hersh PS, Steinert RF, Brint SF. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis comparison of optical side effects. Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:925-933.
2. Iskander NG, Peters NT, Penno EA, Gimbel HV. Postoperative complications in laser in situ keratomileusis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000;11:273-279.
3. Chalita MR, Chavala S, Xu M, Kruger RR. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:447-453.
4. Lee YC, Hu FR, Wang IJ. Quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis: influence of dioptric correction and pupil size on visual function. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:769-777.
5. Fan-Paul NI, Li J, Miller JS, Florakis GJ. Night vision disturbances after corneal refractive surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47:533-546.
6. Carones F, Vigo L, Scandola E. Wavefront-guided treatment of abnormal eyes using the LADARVision platform. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:S703-S708.
7. Nuijts RM, Nabar VA, Hament WJ, Eggink FA. Wavefront-guided versus standard laser in situ keratomileusis to correct low to moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1907-1913.
8. Marcos S, Barbero S, Llorente L, Merayo-Lloves J. Optical response to LASIK surgery for myopia from total and corneal aberration measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:3349-3356.
9. Oshika T, Miyata K, Tokunaga T, Samejima T, Amano S, Tanaka S, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Maeda N, Fujikado T. Higher order wavefront aberrations of cornea and magnitude of refractive correction in laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1154-1158.
10. Applegate RA. Limits to vision: can we do better than nature? J Refract Surg. 2000;16:S547-S551.
11. Schwiegerling J. Theoretical limits to visual performance. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;45:139-146.
12. Thibos LN, Hong X, Clinical applications of the Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:817-825.
13. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS. Functional vision, contrast sensitivity, and optical aberrations. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2003;43:1-3.
14. Ginsburg AP. Contrast sensitivity and functional vision. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2003;43:5-15.
15. Pop M, Payette Y. Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:3-10.
16. Mikelberg FS, Wijsman K, Schulzer M. Reproducibility of topographic parameters obtained with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. J Glaucoma. 1993;2:101-103.
17. Maeda N. Wavefront technology in ophthalmology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001;12:294-299.
18. Lawless MA, Hodge C, Rogers CM, Sutton GL. Laser in situ keratomileusis with Alcon CustomCornea. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:S691-S696.
19. Kim TI, Yang SJ, Tchah H. Bilateral comparison of wavefront-guided versus conventional laser in situ keratomileusis with Bausch and Lomb Zyoptix. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:432-438.
20. Hammond SD Jr, Puri AK, Ambati BK. Quality of vision and patient satisfaction after LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004;15:328-332.
21. Boxer Wachler BS. Effect of pupil size on visual function under monocular and binocular conditions in LASIK and non-LASIK patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:275-278.
22. Rubin GS, Bandeen-Roche K, Huang GH, Munoz B, Schein OD, Fried LP, West SK. The association of multiple visual impairments with self-reported visual disability: SEE project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:64-72.
23. Wood JM, Garth D, Grounds G, McKay P, Mulvahil A. Pupil dilatation does affect some aspects of daytime driving performance. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1387-1390.
24. Meacock WR, Spalton DJ, Boyce J, Marshall J. The effect of posterior capsule opacification on visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4665-4669.
25. Nakamura K, Bissen-Miyajima H, Toda I, Hori Y, Tsubota K. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis correction on contrast visual acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:357-361.
26. Pesudovs K, Hazel CA, Doran RML, Elliott DB. The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:11-16.
27. Bailey MD, Mitchell GL, Dhaliwal DK, Boxer Wachler BS, Zadnik K. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1371-1378.
28. Schein OD, Vitale S, Cassard SD, Steinberg EP. Patient outcomes of refractive surgery: the refractive status and vision profile. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:665-673.