Measuring visual acuity - Mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters?

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2004, Pages

  Pesudovs, Konrad ^a   Marsack, Jason D ^a   Donnelly III, William J ^a   Thibos, Larry N ^b   Applegate, Raymond A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; CATARACT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODULATION TRANSFER FUNCTION; OPTOMETRY; PHOTOPIC VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 4644359289     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081-597x-20040901-20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Applegate RA, Marsack JD, Ramos R, Sarver EJ. Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1487-1495.
2. Applegate RA, Sarver EJ, Khemsara V. Are all aberrations equal? J Refract Surg 2002;18:S556-S562.
3. Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate RA. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis 2004;4:329-351.
4. Marsack JD, Thibos LN, Applegate RA. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis 2004;4:322-328.
5. Marcos S. Aberrations and visual performance following standard laser vision correction. J Refract Surg 2001;17:S596-S601.
6. Artal P, Marcos S, Iglesias I, Green DG. Optical modulation transfer and contrast sensitivity with decentered small pupils in the human eye. Vision Res 1996;36:3575-3586.
7. Carney LG. Contact lens correction of visual loss in keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1982;60:795-802.
8. Hess RF, Carney LG. Vision through an abnormal cornea: a pilot study of the relationship between visual loss from corneal distortion, corneal edema, keratoconus, and some allied corneal pathology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979;18:476-483.
9. Rubin GS, Roche KB, Prasada-Rao P, Fried LP. Visual impairment and disability in older adults. Optom Vis Sci 1994;71:750-760.
10. Carta A, Braccio L, Belpoliti M, Soliani L, Sartore F, Gandolfi SA, Maraini G. Self-assessment of the quality of vision: association of questionnaire score with objective clinical tests. Curr Eye Res 1998;17:506-511.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:135-160.
12. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL, Friend J, McCarthy D, Wu SY. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111: 831-836.
13. Ferris FL 3rd, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;94:91-96.
14. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976;53:740-745.
15. Applegate RA, Howland HC, Sharp RP, Cottingham AJ, Yee RW. Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. J Refract Surg 1998;14:397-407.
16. Carkeet A. Modeling logMAR visual acuity scores: effects of termination rules and alternative forced-choice options. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:529-538.
17. Liang J, Williams DR. Aberrations and retinal image quality of the normal human eye. J Opt Soc Am A 1997;14: 2873-2883.
18. Liang J, Grimm B, Goelz S, Bille JF. Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor. J Opt Soc Am A 1994;11:1949-1957.
19. Salmon TO, Thibos LN, Bradley A. Comparison of the eye's wave-front aberration measured psychophysically and with the Shack-Hartmann wave-front sensor. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1998;15:2457-2465.
20. Altman DG, Bland JM. Detecting skewness from summary information. BMJ 1996;313:1200.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Transforming data. BMJ 1996;312:770.
22. Brown BM, Hettmansperger TP. Normal Scores, Normal Plots, and Tests for Normality. J Am Statist Assoc 1996;91:1668-1675.
23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.
24. Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:85-93.
25. Rosser DA, Cousens SN, Murdoch IE, Fitzke FW, Laidlaw DA. How sensitive to clinical change are ETDRS logMAR visual acuity measurements? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:3278-81.
26. Hess R, Woo G. Vision through cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1978;17:428-435.
27. Lempert P, Hopcroft M, Lempert Y. Evaluation of posterior subcapsular cataracts. With spatial contrast acuity. Ophthalmology 1987;94:14-18.
28. Zadnik K, Mannis MJ, Johnson CA, Rich D. Rapid contrast sensitivity assessment in keratoconus. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:693-697.
29. Rubin GS, Legge GE. Psychophysics of reading. VI-The role of contrast in low vision. Vision Res 1989;29:79-91.
30. Legge GE, Rubin GS, Luebker A. Psychophysics of reading-V. The role of contrast in normal vision. Vision Res 1987;27:1165-1177.
31. Donnelly III WJ, Pesudovs K, Marsack JM, Sarver EJ, Applegate RA. Quantifying scatter in Shack-Hartmann images to evaluate nuclear cataract. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:S515-S522.