Effects of magnetic resonance image interpolation on the results of texture-based pattern classification a phantom study

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 44, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 405-411

  Mayerhoefer, Marius E ^a   Szomolanyi, Pavol ^a,b   Jirak, Daniel ^c   Berg, Andreas ^a,d   Materka, Andrzej ^e   Dirisamer, Albert ^a   Trattnig, Siegfried ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT SCIENCE   (Slovakia)

^c INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Czech Republic)

^d Christian Doppler Laboratory for Innovative Optical Imaging and its Translation to Medicine   (Austria)

^e LODZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Interpolation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pattern recognition; Texture analysis

Indexed keywords

AGAR; POLYSTYRENE;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 67651049848     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181a50a66     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Hajek M, Dezortova M, Materka A, et al. Texture Analysis for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Prague, Czech Republic: Med4Publishing s.r.o.; 2006.
2. Haralick RM, Shanmugan K, Dinstein IH. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans SMC. 1973;3:610-621.
3. Chen P, Pavlidis T. Segmentation by texture using a co-occurrence matrix and a split-and-merge algorithm. Comput Graph Image Proc. 1979;10:172-182.
4. Galloway M. Texture analysis using gray level run lengths. Comput Graph Image Proc. 1975;4:172-179.
5. Haralick R. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE. 1979;67:786-804.
6. Hu Y, Dennis T. Textured image segmentation by context enhanced clustering. IEE Proc Vis Image Signal Process. 1994;141:413-421.
7. Kashyap R, Chellappa R. Estimation and choice of neighbors in spatial- interaction models of images. IEEE Trans InfTheory. 1983;29:60-72.
8. Mallat S. Multifrequency channel decompositions of images and wavelet models. IEEE Trans Acoust. 1989;37:2091-2110.
9. Laine A, Fan J. Texture classification by wavelet packet signatures. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1993;15:1186-1191.
10. Ganeshan B, Miles KA, Young RC, et al. Three-dimensional selective-scale texture analysis of computed tomography pulmonary angiograms. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:382-394.
11. Park YS, Seo JB, Kim N, et al. Texture-based quantification of pulmonary emphysema on high-resolution computed tomography: comparison with density-based quantification and correlation with pulmonary function test. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:395-402.
12. Woods BJ, Clymer BD, Kurc T, et al. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast- enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:495-501.
13. Chen W, Giger ML, Li H, et al. Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:562-571.
14. Kruggel F, Paul JS, Gertz HJ. Texture-based segmentation of diffuse lesions of the brain's white matter. Neuroimage. 2008;39:987-996.
15. Kato H, Kanematsu H, Zhang X, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis: preliminary evaluation of MRI texture analysis using the finite difference method and an artificial neural network. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:117-122.
16. Mahmoud-Ghoneim D, Cherel Y, Lemaire L, et al. Texture analysis of magnetic resonance images of rat muscles during atrophy and regeneration. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:167-171.
17. Krug R, Carballido-Gamio J, Burghardt AJ, et al. Wavelet-based characterization of vertebral trabecular bone structure from magnetic resonance images at 3 T compared with micro-computed tomographic measurements. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:392-398.
18. Rotter M, Berg A, Langenberger H, et al. Autocorrelation analysis of bone structure. JMagn Reson Imaging. 2001;14:87-93.
19. Jirak D, DezortovaM, Hajek M. Phantoms for texture analysis of MR images. Long-term and multi-center study. Med Phys. 2004;31:616-622.
20. Berg A, Ertl A, Moser E. High-resolution polymer gel dosimetry by param- eter selective MR-microimaging on a whole body scanner at 3T. Med Phys. 2001;28:833-843.
21. Berg A, Singer T, Moser E. High-resolution diffusivity imaging at 3.0 T for the detection of degenerative changes: a trypsin-based arthritis model. Invest Radiol. 2003;38:460-466.
22. Davis PJ. Interpolation and Approximation. New York, NY: Blaisdell Publishing Company; 1963.
23. Meijering EHW. A chronology of interpolation: from ancient astronomy to modern signal and image processing. Proc IEEE. 2002;90:319-342.
24. Meijering EHW, Niessen WJ, Viergever MA. Quantitative evaluation of convolution-based methods for medical image interpolation. Med Image Anal. 2001;5:111-126.
25. Thevenaz T, Blu M. Unser M. Interpolation revisited. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000;7:739 -758.
26. Unser M. Splines: a perfect fit for signal and image processing. IEEE Signal Proc Mag. 1999;16:22-38.
27. Bartels RH, Beatty JC, Barsky BA. An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modeling. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.; 1987.
28. McRobbie DW, Moore EA, Graves MJ, et al. MRIFrom Picture to Proton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
29. Mitchell DG, Cohen MS. MRI Principles. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2003.
30. Materka A, Strzelecki M, Lerski R. Feature evaluation of texture test objects for magnetic resonance imaging. In: Pietikainen K, ed. Texture Analysis in Machine Vision, Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence. Singapore: World Scientific; 2000;40:197-206.
31. Collewet G, Strzelecki M, Mariette F. Influence of MRI acquisition protocols and image intensity normalization methods on texture classification. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22:81-91.
32. Materka A, Szypinski P. MaZda User's Manual [MaZda 4.6. download link]; 1999-2006. Available at: http://www.eletel.p.lodz.pl/mazda/download/MaZda. zip. Accessed February 17, 2009.
33. Jirák D, Dezortova M, Taimr P, et al. Texture analysis of human liver. JMagn Reson Imaging. 2002;15:68 -74.
34. Hartigan JA, Wong MA. A k-means clustering algorithm. Appl Stat. 1979; 28:100-108.
35. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ. Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Chinchester, United Kingdom: Wiley; 1990.
36. Castellano G, Bonilha L, Li LM, et al. Texture analysis of medical images. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:1061-1069.
37. Shannon CE. Communication in the presence of noise. Proc IEEE. 1998;86: 447-457.
38. Steen H, Lima JA, Chatterjee S, et al. High-resolution three-dimensional aortic magnetic resonance angiography and quantitative vessel wall characterization of different atherosclerotic stages in a rabbit model. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:614-621.
39. Herborn CU, Watkins DM, Baumann S, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: P792 blood pool agent versus Gd-DOTA in rabbits at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:622-628.
40. Nael K, Fenchel M, Krishnam M, et al. 3.0 Tesla high spatial resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the pulmonary circulation: initial experience with a 32-channel phased array coil using a high relaxivity contrast agent. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:392-398.
41. Pollmann SI, Norley CJ, Pelz DM, et al. Four dimensional intravenous cone-beam computed tomographic subtraction angiography. In vitro study of feasibility. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:753-761.
42. Liu X, Bi X, Huang J, et al. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 T: comparison with steady-state free precession technique at 1.5 T. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:663-668.
43. Antel SB, Collins DL, Bernasconi N, et al. Automated detection of focal cortical dysplasia lesions using computational models of their MRI characteristics and texture analysis. Neuroimage. 2003;19:1748 -1759.
44. Bonilha L, Kobayashi E, Castellano G, et al. Texture analysis ofhippocampal sclerosis. Epilepsia. 2003;44:1546-5150.
45. Kovalev VA, Kruggel F, von Cramon DY. Gender and age effects in structural brain asymmetry as measured by MRI texture analysis. Neuroimage. 2003;19:895-905.