Problems and prospects: Dilemmas in evaluation and directions for the future

Evaluation in Planning: Evolution and Prospects

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 267-276

  Alexander, Ernest R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^b APD   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85084584756     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Alexander, E.R. (2002a), ‘Planning Rights: Toward Normative Criteria for Evaluating Plans’, International Planning Studies 7(3): 191-212.
2. Alexander, E.R. (2002b), ‘The Public Interest in Planning: From Legitimation to Substantive Plan Evaluation’, Planning Theory 1(3): 226-249.
3. Alexander, E.R. (2005a), ‘Institutional Transformation and Planning: From Institutionalization Theory to Institutional Design’, Planning Theory 4(3): 209-223.
4. Alexander, E.R. (2005b), ‘Implementing Norms in Practice: The Institutional Design of Evaluation’, in D. Miller and D. Patassini (eds) Beyond Benefit-Cost Analysis: Accounting for Non-Market Values in Planning Evaluation, Ashgate, Aldershot: 297-310.
5. Alexander, E.R. (2006), ‘Institutional Design for Sustainable Development’, Town Planning Review 77(1): 1-27.
6. Barbanente, A. and A. Khakee (2005) ‘Scenarios as an Exploratory Evaluation Approach: Some Experiences from Southern Mediterranean’, in D. Miller and D. Patassini (eds) Beyond Benefit-Cost Analysis: Accounting for Non-Market Values in Planning Evaluation, Ashgate, Aldershot: 227-250.
7. Borri, D., G. Concilio, F. Selicato, C. Torre (2005), ‘Ethical and Moral Reasoning and Dilemmas in Evaluation Processes: Perspectives for Intelligent Agents’, in D. Miller and D. Patassini (eds) Beyond Benefit-Cost Analysis: Accounting for NonMarket Values in Planning Evaluation, Ashgate, Aldershot: 251-276.
8. th edn.), Penguin Books, London.
9. DETR (2000), Guidance on the Methodology for Multi-Modal Studies, DETR, London. www.webtag.org.uk/webdocuments/1_Overview/2_Multi_Modal_Studies/1.2.1.pdf.
10. Friend, J.K. and W.N. Jessop (1969), Local Government and Strategic Choice, Tavistock Publications, London.
11. Fusco Girard, L., M. Ceretta and P. De Toro (2005), ‘Integrated Planning and Integrated Evaluations: Theoretical References and Methodological Approaches’, in D.Miller and D. Patassini (eds) Beyond Benefit-Cost Analysis: Accounting for Non-Market Values in Planning Evaluation, Ashgate, Aldershot: 175-206.
12. Hill, M. (1985), ‘Decision Making Contexts and Strategies for Evaluation’, in A. Faludi and H. Voogd (eds) Evaluation of Complex Policy Problems, Delftsche Uitgewers Maatschappij, Delft: 9-50.
13. Khakee, A. (2003), ‘The Emerging Gap between Evaluation Research and Practice’, Evaluation 9(3): 340-352.
14. Miller, D. and D. Patassini (2005), ‘Introduction’, in D. Miller and D. Patassini (eds) Beyond Benefit-Cost Analysis: Accounting for Non-Market Values in Planning Evaluation, Ashgate, Aldershot: 1-12.
15. Nijkamp, P., P. Rietveld and H. Voogd (1990), Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical Planning, North Holland, Amsterdam.
16. Patassini, D., P. Cossettini, E. De Polignol, M. Hedorfer, C. Paneghetti and E. Rinaldi (2005), ‘Contextual Knowledge Generated by a Decision Support System for Brownfield Development: The Case of Porto Marghera (Venice, Italy)’, in D. Miller and D. Patassini (eds) Beyond Benefit-Cost Analysis: Accounting for NonMarket Values in Planning Evaluation, Ashgate, Aldershot: 89-115.
17. Voogd, H. (2005), ‘Evaluation of Visitability of Public Urban Places’, in D. Miller and D. Patassini (eds) Beyond Benefit-Cost Analysis: Accounting for Non-Market Values in Planning Evaluation, Ashgate, Aldershot: 15-24.
18. Voogd, H. and A. Faludi (1985), ‘Evaluation of Complex Policy Problems: Some Concluding Remarks’, in A. Faludi and H. Voogd (eds) Evaluation of Complex Policy Problems, Delftsche Uitgewers Maatschappij, Delft: 201-206.