Creating a library resources tool for webct

Internet Reference Services Quarterly

Volumn 13, Issue 2-3, 2008, Pages 197-207

  Ashmore, Beth ^a   McNeal, Lisa A ^a  

^a SAMFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Content management systems; Course integrated instruction; Learning module; WebCT

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650895655     PISSN: 10875301     EISSN: 15404749     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10875300802103858     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bales, A. B., C. L. Taylor, M. L. Havert and T. E. Lehman. 2001. Electronic reserves and WebCT: using courseware to implement electronic reserves at the University Libraries of Notre Dame. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply 11: 4, 37-50.
2. Buehler, M. A. 2004. Where is the library in course management software? Journal of Library Administration 41: 112, 75-84.
3. Carmean, C. and J. Haefner. 2003. Next generation course management systems. EDUCAUSE Quarterly 26: 1, 10-13.
4. Cohen, D. 2002. Course-management software: Where's the Library? EDUCAUSE Review 37: 3, 12-13.
5. Cox, C. 2002. Becoming part of the course. College and Research Libraries News 63: 1, 11-13, 39.
6. Gasaway, L. 2003. Course management software and copyright. Information Outlook 7: 1, 7, 9.
7. Getty, N. K., B. Burd, S. K. Burns and L. Piele. 2000. Using courseware to deliver library instruction via the Web: four examples. Reference Services Review 28: 4, 349-359.
8. Hill, J. and D. G. Wedaman. 2004. Natural collaboration: library-IT WebCT Support at Brandeis University. NERCOMP Conferences. http://connect.educause. edu/ Library/Abstract/NaturalcollaborationLibra/42130 (accessed April 1, 2006).
9. Kendall, M. 2001. Teaching online to campus-based students: The experience of using WebCT for the community information module at Manchester Metropolitan University. Education for Information 19: 4, 325-346.
10. Kesselman, M., D. Khanna and L. Vazquez. 2000. Web authorware and course-integrated library instruction: The learning links project at Rutgers University. College & Research Libraries News 61: 5, 387-90, 402.
11. Kraemer, E. W. 2003. Developing the online learning environment: The pros and cons of using WebCT for library instruction. Information Technology and Libraries 22: 2, 87-92.
12. Machavec, G. S. 2001. Course management software: Where is the library? Online Libraries and Microcomputers 19: 10, 1-2.
13. Macke, B. 2005. Perspectives on . . . roaches, guerrillas, and "librarians on the loose." Journal of Academic Librarianship 31: 6, 586-589.
14. Martin, K. B. and J. Lee. 2003. Using a WebCT to develop a research skills module. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship 37. http://www.istl.org/03-spring/index.html (accessed April 1, 2006).
15. Morss, D. A. 1999. A study of student perspectives on Web-based learning: WebCT in the classroom. Internet Research 9: 5, 393-408.
16. Shank, J. D. and N. H. Dewald. 2003. Establishing our presence in courseware: Adding library services to the virtual classroom. Information Technology and Libraries 22: 1, 38-43.
17. Simpson, C. and Y. Du. 2004. Effects of learning styles and class participation on students' enjoyment level in distributed learning environments. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 45: 2, 23-36.