Ethical conduct in intimate partner violence research: Challenges and strategies

Nursing Outlook

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 210-216

  Btoush, Rula ^a   Campbell, Jacquelyn C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BATTERED WOMAN; CERTIFICATION; CONFIDENTIALITY; EDUCATION; ETHICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; NURSING RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PATIENT SELECTION; PERSONNEL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH SUBJECT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY;

BATTERED WOMEN; CERTIFICATION; CONFIDENTIALITY; DATA COLLECTION; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; NURSING RESEARCH; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PATIENT SELECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PRINCIPLE-BASED ETHICS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 67650627327     PISSN: 00296554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Parker B., and Ulrich Y. Nursing Research Consortium on Violence and Abuse. A protocol of safety: Research on abuse of women. Nurs Res 39 (1990) 248-250
2. Hurst S.A. Vulnerability in research and health care; describing the elephant in the room?. Bioethics 22 (2008) 191-202
3. Shahan J.B., and Kelen G.D. Research ethics. Emerg Med Clin North Am 24 (2006) 657-669
4. Lutz K.F., Shelton K.C., Robrecht L.C., Hatton D.C., and Beckett A.K. Use of certificates of confidentiality in nursing research. J Nurs Scholarsh 32 (2000) 185-188
5. Melton G.B. Certificates of confidentiality under the Public Health Service Act: trong protection but not enough. Violence Vict 5 (1990) 67-71
6. Campbell J.C., and Dienemann J.D. Ethical issues in research on violence against women. In: Renzetti C.M., Edleson J.L., and Bergen R.K. (Eds). Sourcebook on violence against women (2001), Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 57-72
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adverse health conditions and health risk behaviors associated with intimate partner violence-United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 57 (2008) 113-117
8. Hirshon J.M., Krugman S.D., Witting M.D., et al. Variability in institutional review board assessment of minimal-risk research. Acad Emerg Med 9 (2002) 1417-1420
9. Mansbach J., Acholonu U., Clark S., and Camargo Jr. C.A. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol. Acad Emerg Med 14 (2007) 377-380
10. Stair T.O., Reed C.R., Radeos M.S., Koski G., and Camargo C.A. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med 8 (2001) 636-641
11. Iavicoli L.G. Mandatory reporting of domestic violence: The law, friend or foe?. Mt Sinai J Med 72 (2005) 228-231
12. Koziol-Mclain J., and Campbell J.C. Universal screening and mandatory reporting: An update on two important issues for victims/survivors of intimate partner violence. J Emerg Nurs 27 (2001) 602-606
13. Johnson L.E., and Benight C.C. Effects of trauma-focused research on recent domestic violence survivors. J Trauma Stress 16 (2003) 567-571
14. Sullivan C.M., and Cain D. Ethical and safety considerations when obtaining information from or about battered women for research purposes. J Interpers Violence 19 (2004) 603-618
15. World Health Organization. Putting women first: Ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence against women (2001), Author, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.who.int/gender/violence/en/womenfirtseng.pdf http://www.who.int/gender/violence/en/womenfirtseng.pdf. Accessed Oct. 2008
16. Langford D.R. Developing a safety protocol in qualitative research involving battered women. Qual Health Res 10 (2000) 133-142
17. Fontes L.A. Ethics in violence against women research: The sensitive, the dangerous, and the overlooked. Ethics Behav 14 (2004) 141-174
18. Sullivan C.M., Rumptz M.H., Campbell R., Eby K.K., and Davidson II W.S. Retaining participants in longitudinal community research: A comprehensive protocol. J Appl Behav Sci 32 (1996) 262-276
19. Ellsberg M., and Heise L. Bearing witness: Ethics in domestic violence research. Lancet 359 (2002) 1599-1604
20. Hunter W.M., Sadowski L.S., Hassan F., Jain D., De Paula C.S., Vizcarra B., et al. Training and field methods in the WorldSAFE collaboration to study family violence. Inj Control Saf Promot 11 (2004) 91-100
21. National Institutes of Health. NIH Announces Statement on Certificates Of Confidentiality (NOT-OD-02-037) (March 15, 2002). http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-037.html Accessed on April, 2008
22. National Institutes of Health. Certificates of Confidentiality: Background information. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/coc/background.htm Accessed on April, 2008
23. National Institutes of Health. Certificates of Confidentiality Kiosk (March 12, 2007). http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/coc/index.htm Accessed on April, 2008
24. Margolin G., Chien D., Duman S.E., Fauchier A., Gordis E.B., Oliver P.H., et al. Ethical issues in couple and family research. J Fam Psychol 19 (2005) 157-167
25. Steinberg A.M., Pynoos R.S., Goenjian A.K., Sossanabadi H., and Sherr L. Are researchers bound by child abuse reporting laws?. Child Abuse Negl 23 (1999) 771-777
26. Wolf L.E., Zandecki J., and Lo B. The certificate of confidentiality application: A view from the NIH Institutes. IRB 26 (2004) 14-18
27. Hlavka H.R., Kruttschnitt C., and Carbone-Lopez K.C. Revictimizing the victims?. Interviewing women about interpersonal violence. J Interpers Violence 22 (2007) 894-920
28. Griffin M.G., Resick P.A., Waldrop A.E., Mechanic M.B., Griffin M.G., Resick P.A., et al. Participation in trauma research: Is there evidence of harm?. J Trauma Stress 16 (2003) 221-227
29. Newman E., Walker E.A., and Gefland A. Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma-focused research. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 21 (1999) 187-196
30. Ruzek J.I., and Zatzick D.F. Ethical considerations in research participation among acutely injured trauma survivors: An empirical investigation. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 22 (2000) 27-36
31. Walker E.A., Newman E., Koss M., and Bernstein D. Does the study of victimization revictimize the victims?. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 19 (1997) 403-410
32. Campbell J.C. Nursing assessment for risk of homicide with battered women. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 8 (1986) 36-51
33. Campbell J.C., Webster D., Koziol-McLain J., Block C.R., Campbell D., Curry M.A., et al. Assessing risk factors for intimate partner homicide. National Institute of Justice Journal 250 (2003) 14-19
34. McFarlane J.M., Groff J.Y., O'Brien J.A., and Watson K. Secondary prevention of intimate partner violence: A randomized controlled trial. Nurs Res 55 (2006) 52-61
35. Campbell J.C., Webster D., and Glass N. The Danger Assessment: Validation of a lethality risk assessment instrument for intimate partner femicide. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 24 (2009) 653-674
36. Campbell R. Emotionally involved: The impact of researching rape (2002), Routledge, New York, NY
37. Congress E.P. Cultural and ethical issues in working with culturally diverse patients and their families: The use of the culturagram to promote cultural competent practice in health care settings. Soc Work Health Care 39 (2004) 249-262
38. Fontes L.A. Ethics in family violence research: Cross-cultural issues. Fam Relat 47 (1998) 53-61