Use of certificates of confidentiality in nursing research

Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 185-188

  Lutz, Kristin F ^a   Shelton, Kathleen C ^a   Robrecht, Linda C ^a   Hatton, Diane C ^b   Beckett, Ann K ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Certificates of confidentiality; Ethics; Human subjects; Legal issues

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CERTIFICATION; CONFIDENTIALITY; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; NURSING RESEARCH; REVIEW; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

CERTIFICATION; CONFIDENTIALITY; HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES;

EID: 0033660981     PISSN: 15276546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2000.00185.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Amendment to the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (1976). 1974, May. Pub. L. No. 93-282, 122(b) 88 Stat.131.
2. Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (1971) 1970, October. Pub. L. No. 91-513, 3(a) 84 Stat.1241.
3. Cowles, K.V. (1988). Issues in qualitative research on sensitive topics. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 10, 163-179.
4. Flaskerud, J.H., & Winslow, B.J. (1998). Conceptualizing vulnerable populations: Health-related research. Nursing Research, 47, 69-78.
5. Hoagwood K. (1994). The Certificate of confidentiality at the National Institute of Mental Health: Discretionary considerations in its applicability in research on child and adolescent mental disorders. Ethics & Behavior, 4, 123-131.
6. Melton, G.B. (1990). Certificates of confidentiality under the Public Health Service Act: Strong protection but not enough. Violence and Victims, 5, 67-71.
7. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979, April 18). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Office of Protection from Research Risks Reports [Online]. Available: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/oprr/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm
8. Nyamathi, A. (1998). Vulnerable populations: A continuing nursing focus. Nursing Research, 47, 65-66.
9. Public Health Service Act, §301(d), 42 U.S.C.A. §241(d). (1988, November). West 1991, Supp. 1999.
10. Sieber, J.E., & Stanley, B. (1988). Ethical and professional dimensions of socially sensitive research. American Psychologist, 43, 49-55.
11. Silva, M.C. (1995) Ethical guidelines in the conduct, dissemination, and implementation of nursing research. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing.
12. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1991, June 18). Title 45 Public Welfare, Part 46, C.F.R. Protection of Human Subjects. Subpart A Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Federal Register, 56, 28003 [Online]. Available: http://helix.nih.gov:8001/ohsr/mpa/ 45cfr46.php3.