Repeatability of oculus pentacam metrics derived from corneal topography

Cornea

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 657-666

  Miranda, Marco A ^a   Radhakrishnan, Hema ^a   O'Donnell, Clare ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Corneal anterior and posterior surface; Corneal radius of curvature; Corneal shape; Corneal topography; Repeatability; Scheimpflug imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGING; ARTICLE; CAMERA; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL IMAGING; EYELID REFLEX; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KERATOMETRY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67650624137     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31819b01b5     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. McMahon TT, Anderson RJ, Joslin CE, et al. Precision of three topography instruments in keratoconus subjects. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78:599-604.
2. Maeda N, Klyce SD. Videokeratography in contact lens practice. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1994;21:163-169.
3. Bufidis T, Konstas AGP, Mamtziou E. The role of computerized corneal topography in rigid gas permeable contact lens fitting. CLAO J. 1998;24: 206-209.
4. Douthwaite WA. Initial selection of soft contact lenses based on corneal characteristics. CLAO J. 2002;28:202-205.
5. Chastang PJ, Borderie VM, Carvajal-Gonzalez S, et al. Automated keratoconus detection using the EyeSys videokeratoscope. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:675-683.
6. Borderie VM, Touzeau O, Laroche L. Videokeratography, keratometry, and refraction after penetrating keratoplasty. J Refract Surg. 1999; 15:32-37.
7. Alio JL, Belda JI, Artola A, et al. Contact lens fitting to correct irregular astigmatism after corneal refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1750-1757.
8. Watters GA, Owens H. Evaluation of mild, moderate, and advanced keratoconus using ultrasound pachometry and the eyesys videokeratoscope. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:640-646.
9. Cho P, Lam AKC, Mountford J, et al. The performance of four different corneal topographers on normal human corneas and its impact on orthokeratology lens fitting. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:175-183.
10. Srivannaboon S, Reinstein DZ, Sutton HFS, et al. Accuracy of Orbscan total optical power maps in detecting refractive change after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:1596-1599.
11. Jain R, Dilraj G, Grewal SPS. Repeatability of corneal parameters with Pentacam after laser in situ keratomileusis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007;5 5: 341-347.
12. Yebra-Pimentel E, Giráldez MJ, Arias FL, et al. Rigid gas permeable contact lens and corneal topography. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001-21:236-242.
13. González-Méijome JM, Gonzalez-Perez J, Cervino A, et al. Changes in corneal structure with continuous wear of high-Dk soft contact lenses: A pilot study. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:440-46.
14. Pérez JG, Cerviño A, Giraldez MJ, et al. Accuracy and precision of EyeSys and Orbscan systems on calibrated spherical test surfaces. Eye Contact Lens. 2004;30:74-78.
15. Antalis JJ, Lembach RG, Carney LG A comparison of the TMS-1 and the corneal analysis system for the evaluation of abnormal corneas. CLAO J. 1993;19:58-63.
16. Davis LJ, Dresner MS. A comparison of the EH-270 corneal topographer with conventional keratometry. CLAO J. 1991;17:191-196.
17. González-Méijome JM, Queirós A, Jorge J, et al. External factors affecting data acquisition during corneal topography examination. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:91-97.
18. Mandell RB, Chiang CS, Yee L. Asymmetric corneal toricity and pseudokeratoconus in videokeratography. J Am Optom Assoc. 1996;67: 540-547.
19. Buehl W, Stojanac D, Sacu S, et al. Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:7-12.
20. Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Skorpik C. Validity and repeatability of anterior chamber depth measurements with Pentacam and Orbscan. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:858-861.
21. Dubbelman M, Weeber HA, Van Der Heijde RGL, et al. Radius and asphericity of the posterior corneal surface determined by corrected Scheimpflug photography. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80:379-383.
22. Belin MW. Topography and Scheimpflug Imaging: pearls for refractive surgery screening and keratoconus detection. Cataract Refract Surg Today. 2006;1:48-50.
23. Bennett AG. Aspherical and continuous curve contact lenses. Part one. Optom Today. 1988;28:11-14.
24. Douthwaite WA. The asphericity, curvature and tilt of the human cornea measured using a videokeratoscope. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003;23: 141-150.
25. Dubbelman M, Sicam VADP, Van Der Heijde GL. The shape of the anterior and posterior surface of the aging human cornea. Vision Res. 2006;46:993-1001.
26. Lui WO, Edwards MH. Orthokeratology in low myopia. Part 2: Corneal topographic changes and safety over 100 days. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2000;23:90-99.
27. Courville CB, Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Contribution of the ocular surface to visual optics. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:417-25.
28. Wiemer NGM, Dubbelman M, Kostense PJ, et al. The influence of chronic diabetes mellitus on the thickness and the shape of the anterior and posterior surface of the cornea. Cornea. 2007;26:1165-1170.
29. American National Standards Institute. American National Standrad Ophthalmics-Corneal Topography Systems-Standard Terminology. Requirements. ANSI Z80.23-1999. Optical Laboratories Association; 1999.
30. Wilson SE, Klyce SD. Quantitative descriptors of corneal topography. A clinical study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:349-353.
31. Klein SA. Corneal Topography: A review, new ANSI standards and problems to solve. J Opt Soc Am Vis Sci. 2000;35:286-296.
32. Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:892-899.
33. O'Donnell C, Maldonado-Codina C. Agreement and repeatability of central thickness measurement in normal corneas using ultrasound pachymetry and the OCULUS Pentacam. Cornea. 2005;24:920-924.
34. Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U, et al. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1729-1735.
35. Lam AK, Chen D. Pentacam pachometry: comparison with non-contact specular microscopy on the central cornea and inter-session repeatability on the peripheral cornea. Clin Exp Optom. 2006;90:108-114.
36. Jalbert I, Stretton S, Naduvilath T, et al. Changes in myopia with low-Dk hydrogel and high-Dk silicone hydrogel extended wear. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:591-596.
37. Liu Z, Pflugfelder SC. The effects of long-term contact lens wear on corneal thickness, curvature, and surface regularity. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107:105-111.
38. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 1965;52:591-611.
39. Bland JM, Airman DG Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135-160.
40. Bland M, ed. An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2000.
41. British Standards Institution, Precision of test methods. 1: Guide for the determination and reproducibility of a standard test method (BS5497, part 1). London: BSI; 1979.
42. Bland JM, Airman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
43. Friedman M. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc. 1937;32:675-701.
44. Lui WO, Edwards MH. Orthokeratology in low myopia. Part 1: Efficacy and predictability. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2000;23:77-89.
45. Lui WO, Edwards MH, Cho P. Contact lenses in myopia reduction: From orthofocus to accelerated orthokeratology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2000; 23:68-76.
46. Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK. Comparison of methods for detecting keratoconus using videokeratography. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113: 870-874.
47. Smolek MK, Klyce SD, Maeda N Keratoconus and contact lens-induced corneal warpage analysis using the keratomorphic diagram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:4192-204.
48. Jimenez JR, Anera RG, Del Barco LJ. Effects on visual function of approximations of the corneal-ablation profile during refractive surgery. Appl Optics. 2001;40:2200-2205.
49. Jiménez JR, Anera RG, Jiménez Del Barco L, et al. Retinal image quality in myopic subjects after refractive surgery. J Mod Opt. 2000;47:1587-1598.
50. Patel S, Marshall J, Fitzke FW. Shape and radius of posterior corneal surface. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:173-181.
51. Dubbelman M, Van Der Heijde GL. The shape of the ageing human lens: curvature, equivalent refractive index and the lens paradox. Vision Res. 2001;41:1867-1877.
52. Dubbelman M, Van Der Heijde GL, Weeber HA. Change in shape of the aging human crystalline lens with accommodation. Vision Res. 2005;45: 117-132.
53. Kampfer T, Wegener A, Dragomirescu V et al. Improved biometry of the anterior eye segment. Ophthalmic Res. 1989;21:239-248.
54. Oshika T, Tomidokoro A, Tsuji H. Regular and irregular refractive powers of the front and back surfaces of the cornea. Exp Eye Res. 1998;67: 443-47.
55. Cheng X, Himebaugh NL, Kollbaum PS, et al. Test-retest reliability of clinical Shack-Hartmann measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45:351-360.
56. Fogt N, King-Smith PE, Tuell G. Interferometric measurement of tear film thickness by use of spectral oscillations. J Opt Soc Am Assoc. 1998;15: 268-275.
57. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, et al. Precorneal and pre- and postlens tear film thickness measured indirectly with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2524-2528.
58. Danjo Y, Nakamura M, Hamano T. Measurement of the precorneal tear film thickness with a non-contact optical interferometry film thickness measurement system. Jap J Ophthalmol. 1994;38:260-266.
59. Prydal JI, Artal P, Woon H, et al. Study of human precorneal tear film thickness and structure using laser interferometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2006-2011.
60. Ehlers N. The thickness of the precorneal tear film. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1965;8:92.
61. Rengstorff RH. The precorneal tear film: breakup time and location in normal subjects. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1974;51:765-769.
62. Norn MS. Desiccation of the precorneal film. I. Corneal wetting-time. Acta Ophthalmol. 1969;47:865-880.
63. Eysteinsson T, Jonasson F, Sasaki H, et al. Central corneal thickness, radius of the corneal curvature and intraocular pressure in normal subjects using non-contact techniques: Reykjavik eye study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80:11-15.
64. Holmen JB, Ekesten B, Lundgren B. Anterior chamber depth estimation by Scheimpflug photography. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79:576-579.
65. Linnet K. Necessary sample size for method comparison studies based on regression analysis. Clin Chem. 1999;45:882-894.
66. Magari RT. Statistics for laboratory. Method comparison studies. BioPharm. 2002;15:28-32.