Subsequent publication of orally presented original studies within 5 years after 1995 RSNA scientific assembly

Radiology

Volumn 232, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 101-106

  Arrivé, Lionel ^a   Boelle, Pierre Yves ^a   Dono, Pascale ^a   Lewin, Maïté ^a   Monnier Cholley, Laurence ^a   Tubiana, Jean Michel ^a  

^a HÔPITAL SAINT ANTOINE   (France)

Author keywords

Radiological Society of North America; Radiology and radiologists, research; Radiology and radiologists, socioeconomic issues

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MEDLINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RADIOLOGY; REVIEW; RHEUMATOLOGY;

CONGRESSES; MEDLINE; NORTH AMERICA; PERIODICALS; PUBLISHING; RADIOLOGY; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 2942700084     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2321030819     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. De Bellefeuille C, Morrison CA, Tannock IF. The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting: factors which influence presentation and subsequent publication. Ann Oncol 1992; 3:187-191.
2. Byerly WG, Rheney CC, Connely JF, Verzino KC. Publication rates of abstracts from two pharmacy meetings. Ann Pharmacother 2000; 34:1123-1127.
3. Scherer RW, Langenberg P. Full results published in abstracts of Cochrane Methodology Review, issue 1. Oxford, England: The Cochrane Library, 2003.
4. Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert C, et al. Factors influencing publication of research results: follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA 1992; 267:374-378.
5. 1995 RSNA scientific program. Radiology 1995; 197(P):1-698.
6. Juzych MS, Shin DH, Coffey JB, Parrow KA, Tsai CS, Briggs KS. Pattern of ophthalmic abstracts in peer-reviewed journals. Ophthalmology 1991; 98:553-556.
7. Nguyen V, Tornetta P 3rd, Bkaric M. Publication rates for the scientific sessions of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA). Orthop Trauma 1998; 12:457-459.
8. Yentis SM, Campbell GA, Lerman J. Publication of abstracts presented at anaesthesia meetings. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 632-634.
9. Callaham ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C, Young G. Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA 1998; 280:254-257.
10. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, et al. An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 615-621.
11. Timnmr A, Blum T, Lankisch PG. Publication rates following pancreas meetings. Pancreas 2001; 23:212-215.
12. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994; 309:1286-1291.
13. Marson AG, Chadwick DW. How easy are randomized controlled trials in epilepsy to find on Medline? The sensitivity and precision of two Medline searches. Epilepsia 1996; 37:377-380.
14. Berry E, Kelly S, Hutton J, Harris KM, Smith MA. Identifying studies for systematic reviews: an example from medical imaging. Int J of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2000; 16:668-672.
15. Marx WF, Cloft HJ, Do HM, Kallmes DF. The fate of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993: rate of subsequent publication in peer-reviewed, indexed journals. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20:1173-1177.
16. Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1994; 272:158-162.
17. Weber EJ, Callaham ML, Wears RL, Barton C, Young G. Unpublished research from a medical specialty meeting: why investigators fail to publish. JAMA 1998; 280:257-259.
18. Sprague S, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, et al. Barriers to full-text publications following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85:158-163.
19. Thornton A, Lee P. Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53:207-216.
20. Chalmers I. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA 1990; 263: 1405-1408.
21. Kelly JA. Scientific meeting abstracts: significance, access, and trends. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1998; 86:68-76.
22. Rubin HR, Redelmeier DA, Wu AW, Steinberg EP. How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine. Gen Intern Med 1993; 8:255-258.
23. Panush RS, Delafuente JC, Connelly CS, et al. Profile of a meeting: how abstracts are written and reviewed. J Rheumatol 1989; 16:145-147.
24. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 1990; 263:1385-1389.
25. Klassen TP, Wiebe N, Russell K, et al. Abstracts of randomized controlled trials presented at the Society for Pediatric Research meeting: an example of publication bias. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002; 156:474-479.
26. The evidence-based radiology working group. Evidence-based radiology: a new approach to the practice of radiology. Radiology 2001; 220:566-575.