Interference between object-based attention and object-based memory

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 529-536

  Matsukura, Michi ^a   Vecera, Shaun P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECALL;

ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 67650523875     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.3.529     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106-111.
2. Attneave, F., & Arnoult, M. D. (1956). The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 452-471.
3. Awh, E., Barton, B., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychological Science, 18, 622-628.
4. Awh, E., Dhaliwal, H., Christensen, S., & Matsukura, M. (2001). Evidence for two components of object-based selection. Psychological Science, 12, 329-334.
5. Awh, E., Jonides, J., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (1998). Rehearsal in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 780-790.
6. Barnes, L. L., Nelson, J. K., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2001). Object-based attention and object-based working memory: Overlapping processes revealed by selective interference effects in humans. In C. Casanova & M. Ptito (Eds.), Progress in brain research (Vol. 134, pp. 471-481). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
7. Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470.
8. Besner, D., Davies, J., & Daniels, S. (1981). Reading for meaning: The effects of concurrent articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 415-437.
9. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
10. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
11. Gajewski, D. A., & Brockmole, J. R. (2006). Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 581-587.
12. Gibson, B. S. (1994). Visual attention and objects: One versus two or convex versus concave? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 203-207.
13. Griffin, I. C., & Nobre, A. C. (2003). Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1176-1194.
14. Hollingworth, A., Richard, A. M., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: Transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 163-181.
15. Irwin, D. E. (1992). Memory for position and identity across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 307-317.
16. Irwin, D. E., & Andrews, R. V. (1996). Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 125-155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
17. Lee, H., & Vecera, S. P. (2005). Visual cognition influences early vision: The role of visual short-term memory in amodal completion. Psychological Science, 16, 763-768.
18. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
19. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
20. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Matsukura, M., Luck, S. J., & Vecera, S. P. (2007). Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: Protection or prioritization? Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1422-1434.
22. Oh, S.-H., & Kim, M.-S. (2004). The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 275-281.
23. Vecera, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 316-320.
24. Vecera, S. P. (1997). Grouped arrays versus object-based representations: Reply to Kramer et al. (1997). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 14-18.
25. Vecera, S. P., & Farah, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146-160.
26. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 92-114.
27. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 269-274.
28. Woodman, G. F., Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 12, 219-224.