Visual cognition influences early vision: The role of visual short-term memory in amodal completion

Psychological Science

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 763-768

  Lee, Hyunkyu ^a   Vecera, Shaun P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b E11 SSH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COGNITION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; CUES; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PERCEPTUAL CLOSURE; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 27744583286     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01611.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baddeley, A.D., & Logie, R.H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple-component model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28-61). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Behrmann, M., Zemel, R.S., & Mozer, M.C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1011-1036.
3. Besner, D., Davies, J., & Daniels, S. (1981). Reading for meaning: The effects of concurrent articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 415-437.
4. Davis, G., & Driver, J. (1998). Kanizsa subjective figures can act as occluding surfaces at parallel stages of visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 169-184.
5. Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R.D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
6. Irwin, D.E., & Andrews, R.V. (1996). Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. In T. Inui & J.L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI (pp. 125-155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Kanizsa, G. (1975). The role of regularity in perceptual organization. In G. Flores d'Arcais (Ed.), Studies in perception (pp. 48-66). Florence, Italy: Martello.
8. Kanizsa, G., & Gerbino, W. (1982). Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception (pp. 167-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Kellman, P.J., Guttman, S.E., & Wickens, T.D. (2001). Geometric and neural models of object perception. In T.F. Shipley & P.J. Kellman (Eds.), From fragments to objects: Segmentation and grouping in vision (pp. 183-245). New York: Elsevier.
10. Kellman, P.J., & Shipley, T.F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 141-221.
11. Lavie, N., & Driver, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1238-1251.
12. Logie, R.H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Luck, S.J., & Vogel, E.K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
14. Michotte, A., Thinés, G., Costall, A., & Butterworth, G. (1991). Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Moore, C.M., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. (1998). Object-based visual selection: Evidence from perceptual completion. Psychological Science, 9, 104-110.
16. Palmer, S.E., Neff, J., & Beck, D. (1996). Late influences on perceptual grouping: Amodal completion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 75-80.
17. Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369-378.
18. Phillips, W.A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283-290.
19. Pratt, J., & Sekuler, A. (2001). The effects of occlusion and past experience on the allocation of object-based attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 721-727.
20. Pylyshyn, Z. (1999). Is vision continuous with cognition? The case of impenetrability of visual perception. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 341-365.
21. Rensink, R.A., & Enns, J.T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects. Vision Research, 38, 2489-2505.
22. Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Takeichi, H., Nakazawa, H., Murakami, I., & Shimojo, S. (1995). The theory of the curvature-constraint line for amodal completion. Perception, 24, 373-389.
24. Vecera, S.P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 316-320.
25. Vogel, E.K., Woodman, G.F., & Luck, S.J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 92-114.
26. Woodman, G.F., & Luck, S.J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 269-274.
27. Zemel, R.S., Behrmann, M., Mozer, M.C., & Bavelier, D. (2002). Experience-dependent perceptual grouping and object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 202-217.