Team member personality, team processes and outcomes: Relationships within a graduate student project team sample

North American Journal of Psychology

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 369-382

  Kline, Theresa J B ^a   O'Grady, James K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650474842     PISSN: 15277143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Arthur, W., Woehr, D. J., & Graziano, W. G. (200J). Personality testing in employment settings: Problems and issues in the application of typical selection practices. Personnel Review, 30, 657-676.
2. Bacon, D.R., Stewart, K.A., & Silver, W.S. (1999). Lessons learned from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make a difference. Journal of Management Education, 23, 467-488.
3. Barrick, M.R., Stewart, G.L., Neubert, M.J., & Mount, K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processed and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83,377-391.
4. Barry, B., & Stewart. G.L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82,62-78.
5. Boss, R.W. (1978). Trust and managerial problem solving revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 3,330-341.
6. Cascio, W. F., & Shurygailo, S. (2003). E-leadership and virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 362-376.
7. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO-PI personality inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO-PI personality inventory and new five factor inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
9. Costa, A.C., Roe, R.A. & Taillieu, T. (2001) Trust within teams: The relation with performance effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 225-244.
10. Dirks, K.T., & Ferrin, D.L. (2001). The role of trust in organizations. Organization Science, 12,450 - 467.
11. Dirks, K.T., & Ferrin, D.L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611 - 628.
12. English, A., Griffith, R.L., & Steelman, L.A. (2004). Team performance: The effect of team conscientiousness and task type. Small Group Research, 35. 643-665.
13. Hackman, R. J. (2002). Leading teams. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
14. Harrison, M.M., Mohammed, S., Michael, J.H., & Bareness, Z. (April, 2005). The Influence of Intragroup Trust on Team Performance Poster Presented at the Annual Conference for The Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Los Angeles, CA.
15. Hough, L. M., & Oswald, F. L. (2000). Personnel selection: Looking toward the future-remembering the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 51,631-664.
16. Kline, T.J.B. (1999a). Remaking Teams: The Revolutionary Research-Based Guide that Puts Theory into Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Kline, T.J.B. (1999b). The Team Player Inventory: Reliability and validity of a measure of predisposition toward organizational team working environments. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 24, 102-112.
18. Kline, T.J.B. (2003). The Psychometric Properties of Scales that Assess Market Orientation and Team Leadership Skills: A Preliminary Study. International Journal of Testing, 3, 321-332.
19. Kramer, R.M., & Tyler, T.R. (1996) Trust in organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Karau, S.J., & Williams, K.D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
21. Lee, K., & Ashton, M.C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358.
22. MacDonnel, R., O'Neill, T., Kline, T., & Hambley, L. (2009). Bringing group=level personality to the electronic realm: A comparison of face-to- face and virtual contexts. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 12,1-24.
23. McAdams, D.P., & Pals, J.L. (2006). A new big five. American Psychologist, 61, 204-217.
24. Mohammed, S., & Angell, L.C. (2003). Personality heterogeneity in teams: Which differences make a difference for team performance? Small Group Research, 34, 651-677.
25. Neuman, G.A., Wagner, S.H., & Christiansen, N.D. (1999). The relationship between work-team personality comnposition and job performance of teams. Group and Organization Management, 24, 28-45.
26. O'Neill, T.A., & Kline, T.J.B. (2008). Personality as a predictor of teamwork: A Business simulator study. North American Journal of Psychology, 10, 65-78.
27. Rousseau, D.M., Silkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-disciplinary view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
28. Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63,506-516.
29. Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
30. Van der Vegt, G., & Van de Vliert, E. (2002). Intragroup interdependence and effectiveness: Review and proposed directions for theory and practice. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 17, 50-67.
31. Varvel, T., Adams, S.G., Pridie, S.J., & Ulloa, B.C.R. (2004). Team Effectiveness and Individual Myers-Briggs Personality Dimensions. Journal of Management in Engineering, 20, 141-146.
32. Zaccaro, S. J., & Klimoski, R. (2002). The interface of leadership and team processes. Group and Organization Management, 27,4-13.
33. Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17,229-239.