Multimodal effects of local context on target detection: Evidence from P3b

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1680-1692

  Fogelson, Noa ^a   Wang, Xue ^b   Lewis, Jeffrey B ^a   Kishiyama, Mark M ^a   Ding, Mingzhou ^b   Knight, Robert T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COGNITION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; AVERAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; VISUAL FIELD;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

AMPLITUDE DIFFERENCE; AUDITORY MODALITY; LOCAL CONTEXTS; MULTI-MODAL; RANDOM TARGETS; RANDOMIZED SEQUENCE; SINGLE-TRIAL ANALYSIS; TARGET STIMULUS; TARGETS DETECTION; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 67650450485     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21071     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alain, C., Hargrave, R., & Woods, D. L. (1988). Processing of auditory stimuli during visual attention in patients with schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 44, 1151-1159.
2. Barcelo, F., & Knight, R. T. (2007). An information-theoretical approach to contextual processing in the human brain: Evidence from prefrontal lesions. Cerebral Cortex, 17(Suppl. 1), i51-i60.
3. Barcelo, F., Suwazano, S., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Prefrontal modulation of visual processing in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 399-403.
4. Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Sabb, F. W., MacDonald, A., Noll, D. C., et al. (2001). Selective deficits in prefrontal cortex function in medication-naive patients with schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 280-288.
5. Chao, L. L., Nielsen-Bohlman, L., & Knight, R. T. (1995). Auditory event-related potentials dissociate early and late memory processes. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96, 157-168.
6. Chen, Y., Bressler, S. L., Knuth, K. H., Truccolo, W. A., & Ding, M. (2006). Stochastic modeling of neurobiological time series: Power, coherence, Granger causality, and separation of evoked responses from ongoing activity. Chaos, 16, 026113.
7. Cohen, J. D., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1992). Context, cortex, and dopamine: A connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychological Review, 99, 45-77.
8. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 357-374.
9. Duncan-Johnson, C. C. (1981). P300 latency: A new metric of information processing. Psychophysiology, 18, 207-215.
10. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1982). The P300 component of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing. Biological Psychology, 14, 1-52.
11. Ford, J. M., Duncan-Johnson, C. C., Pfefferbaum, A., & Kopell, B. S. (1982). Expectancy for events in old age: Stimulus sequence effects on P300 and reaction time. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 696-704.
12. Fowler, B., Kelso, B., Landlot, J., & Porlier, G. (1988). The effects of nitrous oxide on P300 and reaction time. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 69, 171-178.
13. Fowler, B., & Mitchell, I. (1997). Biological determinants of P300: The effects of a barbiturate on latency and amplitude. Biological Psychology, 46, 113-124.
14. Frodl-Bauch, T., Gallinat, J., Meisenzahl, E.-V., Möller, H.-J., & Hegerl, U. (1999). P300 subcomponents reflect different aspects of psychopathology in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 45, 116-126.
15. Hillyard, S. A., & Kutas, M. (1983). Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 33-61.
16. Hillyard, S. A., Squires, K. C., Bauer, J. W., & Lindsay, P. H. (1971). Evoked potential correlates of auditory signal detection. Science, 172, 1357-1360.
17. Holm, A., Ranta-aho, P. O., Sallinen, M., Karjalainen, P. A., & Müller, K. (2006). Relationship of P300 single-trial responses with reaction time and preceding stimulus sequence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61, 244-252.
18. Huettel, S. A., Song, A. W., & McCarthy, G. (2005). Decisions under uncertainty: Probabilistic context influences activation of prefrontal and parietal cortices. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3304-3311.
19. Johnson, R., Jr. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367-384.
20. Johnson, R., Jr., & Donchin, E. (1980). P300 and stimulus categorization: Two plus one is not so different from one plus one. Psychophysiology, 17, 167-178.
21. Kiehl, K. A., Laurens, K. R., Duty, T. L., Forster, B. B., & Liddle, P. F. (2001). Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: An event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology, 38, 133-142.
22. Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 38, 557-577.
23. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792-795.
24. Low, K. A., Leaver, E., Kramer, A. F., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2006). Fast optical imaging of frontal cortex during active and passive oddball tasks. Psychophysiology, 43, 127-136.
25. MacDonald, A. W., Carter, S. C., Kerns, J. G., Ursu, S., Barch, D. M., Holmes, A. J., et al. (2005). Specificity of prefrontal dysfunction and context processing deficits to schizophrenia in never-medicated patients with first-episode psychosis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 475-484.
26. MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulated cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835-1838.
27. McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1981). A metric for thought: A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science, 211, 77-80.
28. McCarthy, G., Luby, M., Gore, J., & Goldman-Rakic, P. (1997). Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 1630-1634.
29. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
30. Munson, R., Ruchkin, D. S., Ritter, W., Sutton, S., & Squires, N. K. (1984). The relation of P3b to prior events and future behavior. Biological Psychology, 19, 1-29.
31. Parasurman, R., Richer, F., & Beatty, J. (1982). Detection and recognition: Concurrent processes in perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 1-12.
32. Polich, J. (2003). Overview of P3a and P3b. In J. Polich (Ed.), Detection of change: Event-related potential and fMRI findings (pp. 83-98). Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
33. Polich, J., & Bondurant, T. (1997). P300 sequence effects, probability, and interstimulus interval. Physiology & Behavior, 61, 843-849.
34. Polich, J., & Criado, J. R. (2006). Neuropsychological and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 172-185.
35. Poulsen, C., Luu, P., Davey, C., & Tucker, D. M. (2005). Dynamics of task sets: Evidence from dense-array event-related potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 133-154.
36. Sawaki, R., & Katayama, J. (2006). Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 2532-2539.
37. Squires, K. C., Hillyard, S. A., & Lindsay, P. H. (1973). Vertex potentials evoked during auditory signal detection: Relation to decision criteria. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 265-272.
38. Squires, K. C., Squires, N. K., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Decision-related cortical potentials during an auditory signal detection task with cued observation intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 268-279.
39. Squires, K. C., Wickens, C., Squires, N. K., & Donchin, E. (1976). The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science, 193, 1142-1146.
40. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1965). Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150, 1187-1188.
41. Sutton, S., Tueting, P., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1967). Information delivery and the sensory evoked potential. Science, 155, 1436-1439.
42. Suwazano, S., Machado, L., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Predictive value of novel stimuli modifies visual event-related potentials and behavior. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 29-39.
43. Truccolo, W. A., Ding, M., Knuth, K. H., Nakamura, R., & Bressler, S. L. (2002). Trial-to-trial variability of cortical evoked responses: Implications for the analysis of functional connectivity. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 206-226.
44. Verleger, R. (1988). Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 343-427.
45. Verleger, R. (1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131-156.
46. Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, C. V. J., McCallum, W. C., & Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 380-384.
47. Wilikinson, R. T., & Morlock, H. (1967). Auditory evoked response and reaction time. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 23, 50-56.
48. Xu, L., Stoica, P., Li, J., Bressler, S. L., Shao, X., & Ding, M. (in press). ASEO: A method for the simultaneous estimation of single-trial event-related potentials and ongoing brain activities. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2007.901025.