Effects of speed - Accuracy instructions on oculomotor scanning and target recognition in a simulated baggage X-ray screening task

Ergonomics

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 325-333

  McCarley, Jason S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Eye movements; Time stress; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE PREDICTION; ATTENTION; DETECTION RATES; ERROR RATE; PASSENGER THROUGHPUT; RESPONSE SPEED; RESPONSE TIME; SEARCH PERFORMANCE; TARGET RECOGNITION; TIME STRESS; TRAINING PROGRAMMES; TRANSPORTATION SECURITY; VISUAL SEARCH; X-RAY SCREENING;

SPEED; TARGETS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

EYE MOVEMENTS;

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOB PERFORMANCE; JOB STRESS; MALE; MASS RADIOGRAPHY; NORMAL HUMAN; OPERATOR; PREDICTION; RESPONSE TIME; SCREENING TEST; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME MANAGEMENT; TRAINING; VELOCITY; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ATTENTIONAL BLINK; AVIATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRODUCTIVITY; RADIOGRAPHY; REACTION TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT;

ADULT; ATTENTIONAL BLINK; AVIATION; COHORT STUDIES; EFFICIENCY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; RADIOGRAPHY; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; SECURITY MEASURES;

EID: 67650382076     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140130802376059     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Antes, J.R., 1974. The time course of picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 62-70.
2. Atchley, P. and Dressel, J., 2004. Conversation limits the functional field of view. Human Factors, 46, 664-673.
3. Bursill, A.E., 1958. The restriction of peripheral vision during exposure to hot and humid conditions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 113-129.
4. Carmody, D.P., Kundel, H.L., and Toto, L.C., 1984. Comparison scans while reading chest images: Taught, but not practiced. Investigative Radiology, 19, 462-466.
5. Chun, M.M. and Wolfe, J.M., 1996. Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? Cognitive Psychology, 30, 39-78.
6. Dickinson, C. and Zelinsky, G.J., 2005. Marking rejected distractors: A gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1120-1126.
7. Drury, C.G., 1975. Inspection of sheet materials-model and data. Human Factors, 17, 257-265.
8. Drury, C.G. and Chi, C.F., 1995. A test of economic models of stopping policy in visual search. IIE Transactions, 27, 382-393.
9. Easterbrook, J.A., 1959. The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183-201.
10. Gale, A.G. and Worthington, B.S., 1983. The utility of scanning strategies in radiology. In: R. Groner, C. Menz, D.F. Fisher, and R.A. Monty, eds. Eye movements and psychological functions: International views. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Gale, A.G., et al., 2000. Is airport baggage inspection just another medical image? Proceedings of the SPIE, 3981, 184-192.
12. Gramopadhye, A.K., et al., 2002. Visual search and visual lobe size: Can training one affect the other? International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 30, 181-195.
13. Hockey, G.R.J., 1970. Effect of loud noise on attentional selectivity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 26-28.
14. Hollingworth, A., Schrock, G., and Henderson, J.M., 2001. Change detection in the flicker paradigm: The role of fixation position within the scene. Memory & Cognition, 29, 296-304.
15. Hooge, I.T.C. and Erkelens, C.J., 1996. Control of fixation duration during a simple search task. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 969-976.
16. Hooge, I.T.C. and Erkelens, C.J., 1999. Peripheral vision and oculomotor control during visual search. Vision Research, 39, 1567-1575.
17. Ikeda, M. and Takeuchi, T., 1975. Influence of foveal load on the functional visual field. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 255-260.
18. Inhoff, A.W. and Radach, R., 1998. Definition and computation of oculomotor measures in the study of cognitive processes. In: G. Underwood, ed. Eye guidance in reading and scene perception. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19. Jacobs, A.M., 1986. Eye-movement control in visual search: How direct is visual span control? Perception & Psychophysics, 39 (1), 47-58.
20. Koenig, S., Gramopadhye, A.K., and Melloy, B.J., 2002. Use of a job aid to promote systematic search under different levels of task complexity. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 12, 349-363.
21. Krupinksi, E.A., Nodine, C.F., and Kundel, H.L., 1993. Perceptual enhancement of tumor targets in chest X-ray images. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 519-526.
22. Kundel, H.L. and LaFollette, P.S., 1972. Visual search patterns and experience with radiological images. Radiology, 103, 523-528.
23. Kundel, H.L. and Nodine, C.F., 1975. Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. Radiology, 116, 527-532.
24. Kundel, H.L., Nodine, C.F., and Carmody, D., 1978. Visual scanning, pattern recognition, and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. Investigative Radiology, 13 (3), 175-181.
25. Loftus, G.R. and Masson, M.E.J., 1994. Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
26. McCarley, J.S. and Carruth, D.W., 2005. Oculomotor scanning and target recognition in luggage x-ray screening. International Journal of Cognitive Technology, 9, 26-29.
27. McCarley, J.S., et al., 2004. Visual skills in airport security inspection. Psychological Science, 15, 302-306.
28. Mackworth, N.H., 1965. Visual noise causes tunnel vision. Psychonomic Science, 3, 67-68.
29. Macmillan, N.A. and Creelman, C.D., 2005. Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Nodine, C.F., Carmody, D.P., and Herman, E., 1979. Eye movements during visual search for artistically embedded targets. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13 (6), 371-374.
31. Nodine, C.F., Krupinski, E.A., and Kundel, H.L., 1993. Visual processing and decision making in search and recognition of targets embedded in pictorial scenes. In: D. Brogan and A.G. Gale, eds. Visual search 2. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis, 239-249.
32. Nodine, C.F. and Kundel, H.L., 1987. Using eye movements to study visual search and to improve tumor detection. Radiographics, 7, 1241-1250.
33. Nodine, C.F. and Kundel, H.L., 1988. A visual dwell algorithm can aid search and recognition of missed lung nodules in chest radiographs. In: D. Brogan, ed. Visual search: Proceedings of the first international conference on visual search. New York: Taylor & Francis, 399-406.
34. Nodine, C.F., et al., 1996. Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses. Academic Radiology, 3, 1000-1006.
35. Pringle, H.L., 2001. The role of attention and working memory in detection of changes in complex scenes. Unpublished dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign.
36. Russ, J.C., 2002. The image processing handbook, 4th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
37. Salas, E., Driskell, J.E., and Hughes, S., 1996. The study of stress and human performance. In: J.E. Driskell and E. Salas, eds. Stress and human performance. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1-45.
38. Shen, J., et al., 2003. Saccadic selectivity during visual search: The influence of central processing difficulty. In: J. Hyönä, R. Radach, and H. Deubel, eds. The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 65-88.
39. Townsend, J.T. and Ashby, F.G., 1983. Stochastic modelling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. van Diepen, P.M.J. and d'Ydewalle, G., 2003. Early peripheral and foveal processing in fixations during scene perception. Visual Cognition, 10, 79-100.
41. Wang, M.J.J., Lin, S.C., and Drury, C.G., 1997. Training for strategy in visual search. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20, 101-108.
42. Weltman, G., Smith, J.E., and Edstrom, G.H., 1971. Perceptual narrowing during simulated pressurechamber exposure. Human Factors, 13, 99-107.
43. Wickelgren, W., 1977. Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67-85.
44. Wiegmann, D., et al., 2006. Age and automation interact to influence performance of a simulated luggage screening task. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 77, 825-831.
45. Williams, L.J., 1982. Cognitive load and the functional field of view. Human Factors, 24, 683-692.