Prediction of motor and functional outcomes in infants born preterm assessed at term

Pediatric Physical Therapy

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 2-11

  Snider, Laurie ^a   Majnemer, Annette ^a   Mazer, Barbara ^a   Campbell, Suzann ^b   Bos, Arend F ^c  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CANADA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GENERAL MOVEMENTS ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INFANT; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR DEVELOPMENT; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NEWBORN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT; PREDICTION; PREMATURITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SKILL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TEST OF INFANT MOTOR PROFICIENCY; VARIANCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; NEONATAL SCREENING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 67650342848     PISSN: 08985669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181957bdc     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Hack M, Horbar JD, Malloy MH, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Network. Pediatrics. 1991;87:587-597.
2. Collin MF, Halsey CL, Anderson CL. Emerging developmental sequelae in the "normal" extremely low birth weight infant. Pediatrics. 1991;88:115-120.
3. Hack M, Taylor HG, Klein N, et al. Functional limitations and special health care needs of 10- to 14-year-old children weighing less than 750 grams at birth. Pediatrics. 2000;106:554-560.
4. Spittle AJ, Orton J, Doyle LW, et al. Early developmental intervention programs post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2: CD005495.
5. Rosenbaum P, Saigal S, Szatmari P, et al. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales as a summary of functional outcome of extremely low-birth-weight children. Dev Med Child Neurol 1995;37:577-586.
6. World Health Organization. International classification of function, disability and health. 2006. Available at: (http://www3.who.int/icf/ icftemplate.cfm;) Accessed February 22, 2008.
7. Griffiths R. The Abilities of Babies. London: University of London Press; 1954.
8. Ottenbacher KJ, Msall ME, Lyon N, et al. Functional assessment and care of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79:114-123.
9. Rosenbaum P, Stewart D. The World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: a model to guide clinical thinking, practice and research in the field of cerebral palsy. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2004;11:5-10.
10. Als H. Toward a synactive theory of development: Promise for the assessment and support of the infant individuality. Infant Merit Health J. 1982;3:229-243.
11. Als H. A synactive model of neonatal behavioral organization: framework for the assessment of neurobehavioral development in the premature infant and for support of infants and parents in the neonatal intensive care environment. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1986 6:3-53.
12. Als H, Gilkerson L, Duffy FH, et al. A three-center, randomized, controlled trial of individualized developmental care for very low birth weight preterm infants: medical, neurodevelopmental, parenting, and caregiving effects. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003;24:399-408.
13. Als H, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, et al. Early experience alters brain function and structure. Pediatrics. 2004;113:846-857.
14. Als H, Lester BM, Tronick E, et al. Manual for the assessment of preterm infants' behavior (APIB). In: Fitzgerald H, Lester BM, Yog-man MW, eds. Theory and Research in Behavioral Pediatrics. Vol. 1. New York: Plenum Press; 1982:65-132.
15. Als H, Butler S, Kosta S, et al. The Assessment of Preterm Infants' Behavior (APIB): furthering the understanding and measurement of neurodevelopmental competence in preterm and full-term infants. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11:94-102.
16. Snider L, Majnemer A, Mazer B, et al. A comparison of the general movements assessment with traditional approaches to newborn and infant assessment: concurrent validity. Early Hum Dev. 2008;84:297-303.
17. Einspieler C, Prechtl HFR, Bos AF, et al. Prechtl's Method on the Qualitative Assessment of General Movements in Preterm, Term, and Young Infants. Cambridge: MacKeith Press; 2004.
18. Daum C, Grellong B, Kurtzberg D, et al. The Albert Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioral Scale. New York: Albert Einstein University; 1977. Located at Unpublished manual.
19. Campbell SK, Osten ET, Kolobe THA, et al. Development of the test of infant motor performance. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 1993; 4:541-550.
20. Prechtl HF, Einspieler C, Cioni G, et al. An early marker for neurological deficits after perinatal brain lesions. Lancet. 1997;349:1361-1363.
21. Palisano RJ, Snider LM, Orlin MN. Recent advances in physical and occupational therapy for children with cerebral palsy. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2004;11:66-77.
22. Majnemer A, Snider L. A comparison of developmental assessments of the newborn and young infant. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2005;11:68-73.
23. Barbosa VM, Campbell SK, Sheftel D, et al. Longitudinal performance of infants with cerebral palsy on the Test of Infant Motor Performance and on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2003;23:7-29.
24. Rose R, Westcott S. Responsiveness of the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) in infants born preterm. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2005; 17:219-224.
25. Campbell S, Levy P, Zawacki L, et al. Population-based age standards for interpreting results on the Test of Motor Infant Performance. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2006;18:119-125.
26. Campbell SK, Hedeker D. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for discriminating among infants with varying risk for poor motor outcome. J Pediatr. 2001;139:546-551.
27. Dusick AM. Medical outcomes in preterm infants. Semin Perinatol 1997;21:164-177.
28. Einspieler C, Prechtl HRF, Bos AF, et al. Prechtl's Method on the Qualitative Assessment of General Movements in Preterm, Term and Young Infants. Cambridge: MacKeith Press; 2004.
29. CohenJ. A coefficient for agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37-46.
30. Fleiss J, CohenJ. Reliability of Measurement. In: The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1986:1-32.
31. Palisano RJ. Neuromotor and Developmental Assessment. In: Wilhelm IJ, ed. Clinics in Physical Therapy: Physical Therapy Assessment in Early Infancy. New York: Churchill Livingstone Inc; 1993.
32. NewborgJ, Stock JR, Wnek L. Battelle Developmental Inventory. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing; 1984.
33. Sparrow S, Balla D, Cicchetti D. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales Interview Edition: Survey-Form Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1984.
34. Majnemer A, Rosenblatt B, Riley PS. Influence of gestational age, birth weight, and asphyxia on neonatal neurobehavioral performance. Pediatr Neurol. 1993;9:181-186.
35. Msall ME. The panorama of cerebral palsy after very and extremely preterm birth: evidence and challenges. Clin Perinatol. 2006;33:269-284.
36. Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Vohr BR, et al; For the Nichd Neonatal Research N. Gender differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely preterm, extremely-low-birthweight infants. Acta Paediatrica. 2006;95:1239-1248.
37. Gregoire M, Lefebvre F, Glorieux J. Health and developmental outcomes at 18 months in very preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics. 1998;101:856-860.
38. VolpeJ. Neurology of the Newborn. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 2001.
39. Piper MC, DarrahJ. Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant, lst ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1994.
40. Folio M, Fewell RR. Peahody Developmental Motor Scales Examiner's Manual. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 2000.
41. Connolly B,DaltonL,SmithJ,etal. Concurrent validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II) Motor Scale and the Pea-body Developmental Motor Scale II (PDMS-2) in 12-month-old infants. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2006;18:190-196.
42. Limperopoulos C, Majnemer A, Shevell MI, et al. Functional limitations in young children with congenital heart defects after cardiac surgery. Pediatrics. 2001;108:1325-1331.
43. Bennett FC. Perspective: low birth weight infants: accomplishments, risks, and interventions. Infants Young Child. 2002;15:vi-ix.
44. Flegel J, Kolobe TH. Predictive validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance as measured by the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency at school age. Phys Ther. 2002;82:762-771.
45. Schenk LK, KelleyJH, Schenk MP. Models of maternal-infant attachment: a role for nurses. Pediatr Nurs. 2005;31:514-517.