A comparison of developmental assessments of the newborn and young infant

Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 68-73

  Majnemer, Annette ^a,b   Snider, Laurie ^a,b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alberta Infant Motor Scale; Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioral Assessment Scale; Infant development assessment; Neonatal neurobehavioral assessment; Neurobehavioral Assessment of the Preterm Infant; Test of Infant Motor Performance

Indexed keywords

ALBERTA INFANT MOTOR SCALE; EINSTEIN NEONATAL NEUROBEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT SCALE; HUMAN; INFANT; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NEUROBEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PRETERM INFANT; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NEWBORN; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TEST OF INFANT MOTOR PERFORMANCE;

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MOTOR SKILLS; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 18144379491     PISSN: 10804013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrdd.20052     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Bartlett DJ. 2000. Comparison of 15-month motor and 18-month neurological outcomes of term infants with and without motor delays at 10-months-of-age. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 19:61-72.
2. Bartlett DJ, Fanning JEK. 2003. Use of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale to characterize the motor development of infants born preterm at eight months corrected age. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 23:31-45.
3. Campbell SK. 1999. Test-retest reliability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Pediatr Phys Ther 11:60-66.
4. Campbell SK, Kolobe THA. 2000. Concurrent validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Pediatr Phys Ther 12:2-9.
5. Campbell SK, Kolobe TH, Osten ET, et al. 1995. Construct validity of the test of infant motor performance. Phys Ther 75:585-596.
6. Campbell SK, Kolobe TH, Wright BD, et al. 2002b. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9- and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol 44:263-72.
7. Campbell SK, Osten ET, Kolobe THA, et al. 1993. Development of the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am 4:541-550.
8. Campbell S, Wright B, Linacre JM, et al. 2002a. Development of a functional movement scale for infants. J App Measures 3:191-204.
9. Coster W. 1995. Critique of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 15:53-69.
10. Darrah J, Piper M, Watt M-J. 1998a. Assessment of gross motor skills of at-risk infants: Predictive validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol, 40:485-491.
11. Darrah J, Redfern L, Maguire TO, et al. 1998b. Intra-individual stability of rate of gross motor development in full-term infants. Early Hum Dev 52:169-179.
12. Daum C, Grellong B, Kurtzberg D, et al. 1977. The Albert Einstein Neonatal Neurobehavioral Scale, unpublished manual.
13. Fetters L, Tronick EZ. 2000. Discriminate power of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale and the Movement Assessment of Infants for prediction of Peabody Gross Motor Scale scores of infants exposed in utero to cocaine. Pediatr Phys Ther 12:16-23.
14. Girolami GL, Campbell SK. 1994. Efficacy of a neuro-developmental treatment program to improve motor control in infants born prematurely. Pediatr Phys Ther 6:175-184.
15. Hadders-Algra M. 2001. Evaluation of motor function in young infants by means of the assessment of general movements: a review. Pediatr Phys Ther 13:27-36.
16. Hyman C, Snider L, Majnemer A, et al. (in press). Concurrent validity of the neurobehavioral assessment for preterm infant (NAI) at term age. Pediatr Rehabil.
17. Jeng S-F, Yau K-IT, Chen L-C, Hsiao S-F. 2000. Alberta Infant Motor Scale: reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan. Phys Ther 80:168-178.
18. King-Thomas L, Hacker BJ, editors. 1987. A therapist's guide to pediatric assessment. Toronto: Little Brown and Company.
19. Korner AF. 1990. Infant stimulation. Issues of theory and research. Clin Perinatol 17:173-196.
20. Korner AF, Constantinou J, Dimicelli S, et al. 1991. Establishing the reliability and developmental validity of a neurobehavioral assessment for preterm infants: A methodological process. Child Dev 62:1200-1208.
21. Korner AF, Kraemer HC, Reader EP, et al. 1987. A methodological approach to developing an assessment procedure for testing the neurobehavioral maturity of preterm infants. Child Dev 58:1478-1487.
22. Korner AF, Stevenson DK, Forrest T, et al. 1994. Preterm medical complications differentially affect neurobehavioral functions: Results from a new neonatal medical index. J Dev Behav Pediatr 17:37-43.
23. Korner AF, Stevenson DK, Kraemer HC, et al. 1995. Prediction of the development of low birth weight preterm infants by a new neonatal medical index. J Dev Behav Pediatr 14:206-111.
24. Kurtzberg D, Vaughan HGJ, Daum C, et al. 1979. Neurobehavioral performance of low-birth weight infants at 40 weeks postmenstrual age: Comparison with normal full term infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 21:590-607.
25. Liao P-JM, Campbell S. 2002. Comparison of two methods for teaching therapists to score the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Pediatr Phys Ther 14:191-198.
26. Limperopoulos C, Majnemer A, Rosenblatt B, et al. 1997. Agreement between the neonatal neurological examination and a standardized assessment of neurobehavioural performance in a group of high-risk newborns. Pediatr Rehabil 1:9-14.
27. Long TM, Tieman B. 1998. Review of two recently published measurement tools: The AIMS and the TIME. Pediatr Phys Ther 10:62-66.
28. Majnemer A, Brownstein A, Kadanoff R, et al. 1992. A comparison of neurobehavioral performance of healthy term and low-risk preterm infants at term. Dev Med Child Neurol 34:417-424.
29. Majnemer A, Mazer B. 1998. Neurologic evaluation of the newborn infant: Definition and psychometric properties. Dev Med Child Neurol 40:708-715.
30. Majnemer A, Rosenblatt B. 1995. Clinical and electrophysiologic predictors of outcome at school entry in NICU survivors. J Pediatr 127:823-830.
31. Majnemer A, Rosenblatt B. 2000. Prediction of outcome at school age in neonatal intensive care unit graduates using neonatal neurologic tools. J Child Neurol 15:645-651.
32. Majnemer A, Rosenblatt B, Riley PS. 1993. Influence of gestational age, birth weight, and asphyxia on neonatal neurobehavioral performance. Pediatr Neurol 9:181-186.
33. Majnemer A, Rosenblatt B, Riley P. 1994. Predicting outcome in high-risk newborns with a neonatal neurobehavioral assessment. Am J Occup Ther 48:723-732.
34. Murnay ME, Campbell SK. 1998. The ecological relevance of the Test of Infant Motor Performance elicited scale items. Physical Therapy 78:479-489.
35. Piper MC, Darrah J. 1994. Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant: Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
36. Piper M, Pinnell LE, Darrah J, et al. 1992. Construction and validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Can J Public Health 83(Suppl 2):46-50.
37. Richardson DK, Gray JE, McCormick MC, et al. 1993. Score for neonatal acute physiology: A physiologic severity index for neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics 91:617-623.
38. Snider L, Tremblay S, Limperopoulous C, et al. 2005. Construct validity of the neurobehavioral assessment of preterm infants. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 25.
39. Wallace IF, Rose SA, McCarton CM, et al. 1995. Relations between infant neurobehavioral performance and cognitive outcome in very low birth weight preterm infants. J Dev Behav Pediatr 16:309-317.