Population-based age standards for interpreting results on the test of motor infant performance

Pediatric Physical Therapy

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 119-125

  Campbell, Suzann K ^a   Levy, Paul ^b   Zawacki, Laura ^a   Liao, Pai Jun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b M/C 898 ^*

Author keywords

Developmental disabilities diagnosis; Female; Infant; Infant newborn; Infant premature; Male; Motor skills; Motor skills disorders diagnosis; Neuropsychological tests standards; Predictive value of tests; Psychomotor disorders diagnosis; Reference standards

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; ETHNOLOGY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREDICTION; PSYCHOMOTOR DEVELOPMENT; REFERENCE VALUE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLE SIZE; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX RATIO;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGE FACTORS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT DISORDERS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33748152826     PISSN: 08985669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.pep.0000223108.03305.5d     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. McHorney CA. Concepts and measurement of health status and health-related quality of life. In: Albrecht GL, Fitzpatrick R, Scrimshaw SC, eds. Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine London: Sage; 2000;339-358.
2. Campbell SK. The quest for measurement of infant motor performance. In: Refshauge K, Ada L, Ellis E, eds. Science-based Rehabilitation: Theories Into Practice. Philadelphia, PA: Butterworth Heinemann; 2005;49-65.
3. Campbell SK. The Test of Infant Motor Performance. Test User's Manual. Version 2.0. Chicago, IL: Infant Motor Performance Scales, LLC; 2005.
4. Campbell SK, Wright BD, Linacre JM. Development of a functional movement scale for infants. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:191-205.
5. Campbell SK, Kolobe THA, Osten ET, et al. Construct validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Phys Ther. 1995;75:585-596.
6. Campbell SK, Hedeker D. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for discriminating among infants with varying risk for poor motor outcome. J Pediatr. 2001;139:546-551.
7. Campbell SK, Kolobe THA, Wright BD, et al. Validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance for prediction of 6-, 9-, and 12-month scores on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002; 44:263-272.
8. Kolobe THA, Bulanda M, Susman L. Predicting motor outcome at preschool age for infants tested at 7, 30, 60, and 90 days after term age using the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Phys Ther. 2004;84:1144-1156.
9. Flegel J, Kolobe THA. Predictive validity of the Test of Infant Motor Performance as measured by the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency at school age. Phys Ther. 2002;82:762-771.
10. Barbosa VM, Campbell SK, Sheftel D, et al. Longitudinal performance of infants with cerebral palsy on the Test of Infant Motor Performance and on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Phys Occup Ther in Pediatr. 2003;23:(3)7-29.
11. Murney ME, Campbell SK. The ecological relevance of the Test of Infant Motor Performance elicited scale Items. Phys Ther. 1998;78:479-489.
12. Girolami GL, Campbell SK. The efficacy of a neuro-developmental treatment program for improving motor control in preterm infants. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1994;6:175-184.
13. Lekskulchai R, Cole J. Effect of a developmental program on motor performance in infants born preterm. Aus J Physiother. 2001;47:169-176.
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health, United States, 1998 with Socioeconomic Status and Health Chartbook. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, US DHHS Publication Number (PHS) 1998; 98-1232.
15. Molfese VJ, Thomson B. Optimality versus complications: Assessing predictive values of perinatal scales. Child Dev 1985;56:810-823.
16. Msall ME, Tremont MR. Measuring functional outcomes after prematurity: Developmental impact of very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight status on childhood disability. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8:258-272.
17. Bracewell M, Marlow N. Patterns of motor disability in very preterm children. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2002;8:241-248.
18. Liao P-j M, Campbell SK. Comparison of two methods for teaching therapists to score the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2002;14:191-198.
19. Linacre JM. FACETS: Computer Program for Many-faceted Rasch Measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press; 1998.
20. Fletcher RW, Fletcher SW. Clinical Epidemiology. The Essentials. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005;35-58.
21. Anastasi A, Urbina S. Psychological Testing. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1997;61.
22. Campbell SK. Test-retest reliability of the Test of Infant Motor Performance. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1999;11:60-66.
23. Haley S. Changes in interpreting clinical changes. III Step Conference Presentation, Linking Movement Science and Intervention, Salt Lake City, UT, July 19, 2005. Accessed February 11, 2006 from the DVD Conference Proceedings.