Higher-order aberrations when wearing sphere and toric soft contact lenses

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 115-122

  Berntsen, David A ^a   Merchea, Mohinder M ^b   Richdale, Kathryn ^a   MacK, Carla J ^a   Barr, Joseph T ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BAUSCH AND LOMB   (United States)

Author keywords

Astigmatism; Contact lens design; Spherical contact lens; Toric contact lens, higher order aberrations

Indexed keywords

ASTIGMATISM; CROSS-OVER; FIXED EFFECTS; HIGHER ORDER; LENS DESIGNS; LINEAR MODEL; RANDOM EFFECTS; SOFT CONTACT LENS; SPHERICAL ABERRATIONS; SPHERICAL CONTACT LENS; T-TESTS; TORIC CONTACT LENS, HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS; TORIC LENS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL QUALITIES; ZONE DESIGN;

ABERRATIONS; CONTACT LENSES; DESIGN; OPTICAL INSTRUMENT LENSES; PRISMS; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

SPHERES;

CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SOFT CONTACT LENS; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADOLESCENT; ASTIGMATISM; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MYOPIA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67650305591     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318194e951     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Remba MJ. Soft toric lenses. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1981;21:113-21.
2. Remba MJ. Part II. Clinical evaluation of toric hydrophilic contact lenses. J Am Optom Assoc 1981;52:211-21.
3. Remba MJ. Clinical evaluation of FDA approved toric hydrophilic soft contact lenses (Part I). J Am Optom Assoc 1979;50:289-93.
4. Cabrera JV, Rodriguez JB. Vision with disposable toric contact lenses and daily-wear toric contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998; 18:66-74.
5. Morgan PB, Woods CA, Jones D, Efron N, Tan K, Gonzalez MY, Pesinova A, Runberg S, Tranoudis IG, Chandrinos A, Fine P, Montani G, Marani E, Itoi M, Bendoriene J, van der Worp E, Helland M, Phillips G, Belousov V, Barr JT. International contact lens prescribing in 2006. Contact Lens Spectrum 2007;22:34-8.
6. Dorronsoro C, Barbero S, Llorente L, Marcos S. On-eye measurement of optical performance of rigid gas permeable contact lenses based on ocular and corneal aberrometry. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80: 115-25.
7. Hong X, Himebaugh N, Thibos LN. On-eye evaluation of optical performance of rigid and soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78: 872-80.
8. Lu F, Mao X, Qu J, Xu D, He JC. Monochromatic wavefront aberrations in the human eye with contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80:135-41.
9. Roberts B, Athappilly G, Tinio B, Naikoo H, Asbell P. Higher order aberrations induced by soft contact lenses in normal eyes with myopia. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:138-42.
10. Jiang H, Wang D, Yang L, Xie P, He JC. A comparison of wavefront aberrations in eyes wearing different types of soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:769-74.
11. Dietze HH, Cox MJ. On- and off-eye spherical aberration of soft contact lenses and consequent changes of effective lens power. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:126-34.
12. Dietze HH, Cox MJ. Correcting ocular spherical aberration with soft contact lenses. J Opt Soc Am (A) 2004;21:473-85.
13. Vaz TC, Gundel RE. High- and low-contrast visual acuity measurements in spherical and aspheric soft contact lens wearers. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2003;26:147-51.
14. Lopez-Gil N, Howland HC, Howland B, Charman N, Applegate R. Generation of third-order spherical and coma aberrations by use of radically symmetrical fourth-order lenses. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1998; 15:2563-71.
15. Richdale K, Berntsen DA, Mack CJ, Merchea MM, Barr JT. Visual acuity with spherical and toric soft contact lenses in low- to moderatestigmatic eyes. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:969-75.
16. Rodriguez P, Navarro R, Gonzalez L, Hernandez JL. Accuracy and reproducibility of Zywave, Tracey, and experimental aberrometers. J Refract Surg 2004;20:810-7.
17. Burakgazi AZ, Tinio B, Bababyan A, Niksarli KK, Asbell P. Higher order aberrations in normal eyes measured with three different aberrometers. J Refract Surg 2006;22:898-903.
18. Hament WJ, Nabar VA, Nuijts RM. Repeatability and validity of Zywave aberrometer measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28: 2135-41.
19. American National Standards Institute. Ophthalmics - Methods for Reporting Optical Aberrations of the Eye. ANSI Z80.28-2004. New York: American National Standards Institute; 2004.
20. Applegate RA, Ballentine C, Gross H, Sarver EJ, Sarver CA. Visual acuity as a function of Zernike mode and level of root mean square error. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:97-105.
21. Applegate RA, Sarver EJ, Khemsara V. Are all aberrations equal? J Refract Surg 2002;18:S556-62.
22. Cheng X, Bradley A, Thibos LN. Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics. J Vis 2004;4:310-21.
23. Marsack JD, Thibos LN, Applegate RA. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis 2004; 4:322-8.
24. Applegate RA, Marsack JD, Thibos LN. Metrics of retinal image quality predict visual performance in eyes with 20/17 or better visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:635-40.
25. Pesudovs K, Marsack JD, Donnelly WJ III, Thibos LN, Applegate RA. Measuring visual acuity - mesopic or photopic conditions, and high or low contrast letters? J Refract Surg 2004;20:S508-14.