Higher order aberrations in normal eyes measured with three different aberrometers

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 898-903

  Burakgazi, Ahmet Z ^a   Tinio, Bernard ^a   Bababyan, Alejandro ^a   Niksarli, Kevin Kevork ^a   Asbell, Penny ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CURVATURE; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KERATOMETRY; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA IMAGE; VISION; WAVEFRONT ABERRATION; WAVEFRONT ABERROMETRY;

EID: 33751072655     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081-597x-20061101-10     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Thibos LN, Hong X. Clinical applications of the Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:817-825.
2. Dhaliwal DK, Mather R. New developments in corneal and external disease. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003;16:119-125.
3. Nuijts RMMA, Nabar VA, Hament WJ, Eggink FA. Wavefront-guided versus standard laser in situ keratomileusis to correct low to moderate myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1907-1913.
4. Applegate RA, Thibos LN, Hilmantel G. Optics aberroscopy and super vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1093-1107.
5. MacRae SM, Williams DR. Wavefront guided ablation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:915-919.
6. Bailey MD, Mitchell GL, Dhaliwal DK, Boxer Wachler BS, Zadnik K. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1371-1378.
7. Marcos S. Aberrations and visual performance following standard laser vision correction. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:S596-S601.
8. Thibos LN. Principles of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:S563-S565.
9. Mrochen M, Seiler T. Fundamentals of wavefront guided refractive corneal surgery [German]. Ophthalmologe. 2001;98:703-714.
10. Hieda O, Kinoshita S. Measuring of ocular wavefront aberration in large pupils using OPD-scan. Semin Ophthalmol. 2003;18:35-40.
11. Amano S, Amano Y, Yamagami S, Miyai T, Miyata K, Samejima T, Oshika T. Age-related changes in corneal and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:988-992.
12. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurements in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician. 1983;32:307.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
14. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Adams AJ. The repeatability of measurement of the ocular components. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2325-2333.
15. Hament WJ, Nabar VA, Nuijts RM. Repeatability, and validity of Zywave aberrometer measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:2135-2141.
16. Durrie DS, Stahl ED. Comparing wavefront devices. In: Krueger RR, Applegate RA, MacRae SM, eds. Wavefront Customized Visual Correction: The Quest for Super Vision II. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc; 2004:161-168.
17. Mirshahi A, Buhren J, Gerhardt D, Kohnen T. In vivo and in vitro repeatability of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2295-2301.
18. Thibos LN, Applegate RA, Schwiegerling JT, Webb R; VSIA Standards Taskforce Members. Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:S652-S660.