A clinical comparison between two acoustic analysis softwares: MDVP and Praat

Biomedical Signal Processing and Control

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 202-205

  Amir, Ofer ^a   Wolf, Michael ^b   Amir, Noam ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Acoustic analysis; MDVP; Praat; Voice disorders

Indexed keywords

JITTER; LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS; LINGUISTICS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS;

ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS; ACOUSTIC PARAMETERS; FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCIES; GROUP DIFFERENCES; MDVP; MULTI DIMENSIONAL; PRAAT; VOICE DISORDERS;

CLINICAL RESEARCH;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYST; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNX PAPILLOMATOSIS; LARYNX TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH ANALYSIS; VOWEL;

EID: 67650239449     PISSN: 17468094     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2008.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Hakkesteegt M.M., Brocaar M.P., Wieringa M.H., and Feenstra L. The relationship between perceptual evaluation and objective multiparametric evaluation of dysphonia severity. J. Voice 22 (2008) 138-145
2. Titze I.R. Principles of Voice Production. 2nd edn. (2000), National Center for Voice and Speech, Iowa City, IA
3. Godino-Llorente J.I., Osma-Ruiz V., Saenz-Lechon N., et al. Acoustic analysis of voice using WPCVox: a comparative study with Multi Dimensional Voice Program. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 265 (2008) 465-476
4. Deliyski D.D., Shaw H.S., and Evans M.K. Influence of sampling rate on accuracy and reliability of acoustic voice analysis. Logop. Phoniatr. Vocol. 30 (2005) 55-62
5. Deliyski D.D., Shaw H.S., and Evans M.K. Regression tree approach to studying factos influencing acoustic voice analysis. Folia. Phoniatr. Logop. 58 (2006) 274-288
6. Baken R.J. Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice (1987), Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA
7. Smith I., Ceuppens P., and De Bodt. M.S. A comparative study of acoustic voice measurements by means of Dr. Speech and Computerized Speech Lab. J. Voice 19 (2005) 187-196
8. Karnell M.P., Hall K.D., and Landahl K.L. Comparison of fundamental frequency and perturbation measures among three analysis systems. J. Voice 9 (1995) 383-393
9. D.D. Deliyski. MDVP software instruction manual, Kay Elemetrics Corp., Appendix E.
10. Boersma P. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. IFA Proceedings (1993) 17
11. Maryn Y., Corthals P., Vanderbeke J., Vanwynsberge E., De Bodt M., and van Cauwenberge P. Intersystem and interprogram difference in acoustic perturbation measurement: a comparison between MDVP and Praat. Paper presented in the 7th Pan European Voice Conference (PEVOC7). Groningen, The Netherlands, 29th August-1st September (2007)
12. Glass G.V., and Hopkins K.D. Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology. 2nd edn. (1984), Needham Heights, Massachusetts
13. Titze I.R. Workshop on Acoustic Voice Analysis: Summary Statement (1995), National Center for Voice and Speech, Iowa City