Acoustic analysis of voice using WPCVox: A comparative study with Multi Dimensional Voice Program

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Volumn 265, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 465-476

  Godino Llorente, Juan Ignacio ^a   Osma Ruiz, Víctor ^a   Sáenz Lechón, Nicolás ^a   Cobeta Marco, Ignacio ^b   González Herranz, Ramón ^b   Ramírez Calvo, Carlos ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO PRÍNCIPE DE ASTURIAS   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO GREGORIO MARAÑÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Acoustic measurements; MDVP; Normal voice; Pathological voice; WPCVox

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNX DISORDER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; VOICE;

ACOUSTICS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VOICE DISORDERS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 39849103417     PISSN: 09374477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-007-0467-x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Kay Elemetrics Corporation (1994) MDVP operations manual. Model 4305
2. Godino-Llorente JI, Sáenz-Lechón N, Osma-Ruiz V et al (2006) An integrated tool for the diagnosis of voice disorders. Med Eng Phys 28:276-289
3. Smits I, Ceuppens P, de Bodt M (2005) A comparative study of acoustic voice measurements by means of Dr. Speech and Computerized Speech Lab. J Voice 19:187-196
4. Hirano M (1981) Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice. Springer, New York
5. Kay Elemetrics Corp (1994) Voice Disorders Database, version 1.03. Lincoln Park, NJ
6. Parsa V, Jamieson D (2000) Identification of pathological voices using glottal noise measures. J Speech Lang Hear Res 43:469-485
7. Childers D (2000) Speech processing and synthesis toolboxes. Wiley, New York
8. Baken RJ, Orlikoff R (2000) Clinical measurement of speech and voice, 2nd edn. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA, USA
9. Feijoo S, Hernández-Espinosa C (1990) Short-term stability measures for the evaluation of vocal quality. J Speech Hear Res 33:324-334
10. Deliyski D (1993) Acoustic model and evaluation of pathological voice production. In: Proceedings of Eurospeech'93. Berlin, Germany 3:1969-1972
11. Yumoto E, Gould W, Baer T (1982) Harmonics-to-noise ratio as an index of the degree of hoarseness. J Acoust Soc Am 71:1544-1550
12. de Krom G (1993) A cepstrum-based technique for determining a harmonics-to-noise ratio in speech signals. J Speech Hear Res 36:254-266
13. Kasuya H, Ogawa S, Mashima K, Ebihara S (1986) Normalized noise energy as an acoustic measure to evaluate pathologic voice. J Acoust Soc Am 80:1329-1334
14. Weiss NA (2000) Introductory statistics, 6th edn. Addison Wesley, Reading, USA
15. Michaelis D, Fröhlich M, Strube HW (1998) Selection and combination of acoustic features for the description of pathologic voices. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1628-1639
16. Fröhlich M, Michaelis D, Strube HW, Kruse E (2000) Acoustic voice analysis by means of the hoarseness diagram. J Speech Lang Hear Res 43:706-720
17. Hanley J, McNeil B (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristics curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839-843
18. Fernández R, Damborenea J et al (1999) Acoustic analysis of the normal voice in nonsmoking adults. Acta Otorrinolaringol Española 50:134-141
19. Damborenea J, Fernández R et al (1999) The effect of tobacco consumption on acoustic voice analysis. Acta Otorrinolaringol Española 50:448-452
20. Karnell MP, Hall KD, et al (1995) Comparison of fundamental frequency and perturbation measurements among three analysis systems. J Voice 9:383-393
21. Baker K, Ramig L, Jones S, Freed CR (1997) Preliminary voice and speech analysis following fetal dopamine transplants in 5 individuals with Parkinson disease. J Speech Lang Hear Res 40:615-626
22. McAllister A, Sundberg J, Hibi S (1998) Acoustic measurements and perceptual evaluation of hoarseness in children's voices. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocol 23:27-38
23. Wolfe V, Cornell R, Palmer C (1991) Acoustic correlates of pathologic voice types. J Speech Hear Res 34(3):509-516
24. Wolfe V, Martin D (1997) Acoustic correlates of dysphonia: type and severity. J Commun Disord 30(5):403-416
25. Preciado JA, Fernández S (1998) Digital analysis of the acoustic signal in vocal pathology diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity of shimmer and jitter measurements. Acta Otorrinolaringol Española 49:475-481
26. Hollien H, Thompson CL, Cannon B (1973) Speech intelligibility as a function of ambient pressure and Heo 2 atmosphere. Aerosp Med 44:249-253
27. Orlikoff R, Baken RJ (1990) Considerations on the relationship between the fundamental frequency of phonation and vocal jitter. Folia Phoniatrica 42:31-40
28. González T, Cervera T, Miralles J (2002) Análisis acústico de la voz: fiabilidad de un conjunto de parámetros multidimensionales. Acta Otorrinolaringol Española 53:256-268
29. Orlikoff R, Walton JH (1994) Speaker race identification from acoustic cues in the vocal signal. J Speech Hear Res 37:738-745
30. Dwire A, McCauley R (1995) Repeated measures of vocal fundamental frequency perturbation obtained using the Visi-pitch. J Voice 9(2):156-162
31. Takahashi H, Koike Y (1976) Some perceptual dimensions and acoustical correlates of pathologic voices. Acta Otolaryngol 338:1-24
32. Karnell MP (1991) Laryngeal perturbation analysis: minimum length of analysis window. J Speech Hear Res 34:544-548
33. Horii Y (1979) Fundamental frequency perturbation observed in sustained phonation. J Speech Hear Res 22:5-19
34. Orlikoff R, Kahane JC (1991) Influence of mean sound pressure level on jitter and shimmer measures. J Voice 5:113-119