A comparative study of two root-coverage techniques with regard to interdental papilla dimension as a prognostic factor

International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 179-189

  Haghighati, Farideh ^a   Mousavi, Mahvash ^a   Moslemi, Neda ^a   Kebria, Mehdi M ^b   Golestan, Banafsheh ^a  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLODERM; COLLAGEN;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL SKIN; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GINGIVA; GINGIVA DISEASE; GINGIVOPLASTY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERIODONTICS; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TRANSPLANTATION;

COLLAGEN; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; FEMALE; GINGIVA; GINGIVAL RECESSION; GINGIVOPLASTY; HUMANS; MALE; PERIODONTAL INDEX; PROGNOSIS; SKIN, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 67650230604     PISSN: 01987569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bouchard PH, Matet J, Borghetti A. Decision-making in aesthetics: Root coverage revisited. Periodontol 2000 2001; 27:97-120.
2. Miller PD. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5:8-13.
3. Borghetti A, Louise F. Controlled clinical evaluation of the subpedicle connective tissue graft for the coverage of gingival recession. J Periodontol 1994; 65:1107-1112.
4. Bouchard P, Etienne D, Ouhayoun JP, Nilveus R. Subepithelial connective tissue grafts in the treatment of gingival recession. Comparative study of 2 procedures. J Periodontol 1994;65:929-936.
5. Barros RR, Novaes AB, Grisi MF, Souza SL, Taba MJ, Palioto DB. A 6-month comparative clinical study of a conventional and a new surgical approach for root coverage with acellular dermal matrix. J Periodontol 2004;75:1350-1356.
6. Zucchelli G, Testori T, De Sanctis M. Clinical and anatomical factors limiting treatment outcomes of gingival recession: A new method to predetermine the line of root coverage. J Periodontol 2006;77:714-721.
7. Al-Zahrani MS, Bissada NF. Predictability of connective tissue grafts for root coverage: Clinical perspectives and a review of the literature. Quintessence Int 2005;36: 609-616.
8. Pini Prato G, Pagliaro U, Baldi C, et al. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Flap with tension versus flap without tension: A Randomized controlled clinical study. J Periodontol 2000; 71:188-201.
9. Baldi C, Pini Prato G, Pagliaro U, et al. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Is flap thickness a relevant predictor to achieve root coverage? A19-case series. J Periodontol 1999;70:1077-1084.
10. Huang L, Neiva RE, Wang HL. Factors affecting the outcome of coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure. J Periodontol 2005;76:1729-1734.
11. de Queiroz Cortes A, Sallum AW, Casati MZ, Nociti FH Jr, Sallum EA. A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft. J Clin Periodontol 2006;33:683-689.
12. Pini Prato GP, Baldi C, Nieri M, et al. Coronally advanced flap: The post-surgical position of the gingival margin is an important factor for achieving complete root coverage. J Periodontol 2005; 76:713-722.
13. Yotnuengnit P, Promsudthi A, Teparat T, Laohapand P, Yuwaprecha W. Relative connective tissue graft size affects root coverage treatment outcome in the envelope procedure. J Periodontol 2004; 75:886-892.
14. Sillness P, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-135.
15. Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J 1975;25:229-235.
16. Saletta D, Pini Prato G, Pagliaro U, Baldi C, Mauri M, Nieri M. Coronally advanced flap procedure: Is the interdental papilla a prognostic factor for root coverage? J Periodontol 2001;72:760-766.
17. Harris RJ. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with an acellular dermal matrix versus a connective tissue graft: Results of 107 recession defects in 50 consecutively treated patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20:51-59.
18. Hirsch A, Goldstein M, Goultschin J, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. A 2-year follow-up of root coverage using sub-pedicle acellular dermal matrix allografts and subepithelial connective tissue autografts. J Periodontol 2005;76:1323-1328.
19. Harris RJ. GTR for root coverage: A long-term follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:55-61.
20. Harris RJ. Cellular dermal matrix used for root coverage: 18-month follow-up observation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:156-163.
21. Harris RJ. A short-term and long-term comparison of root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix and a subepithelial graft. J Periodontol 2004;75:734-743.
22. Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Esposito P, et al. Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: A comparative 1-year clinical study. J Periodontol 2002;73:1299-1307. (Pubitemid 35469678)
23. Berlucchi I, Francetti L, Del Fabbro M, Basso M, Weinstein RL. The influence of anatomical features on the outcome of gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap and enamel matrix derivative: A 1-year prospective study. J Perio -dontol 2005;76:899-907.