Development and evaluation of a CAI courseware 'G-Reflect' on students' achievement and motivation in learning Mathematics

European Journal of Social Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 557-568

  Mahmud, Rosnaini ^a   Ismail, Mohd Arif Hj ^b   Kiaw, Lim Ai ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^c Batu Unjur National Secondary School   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Achievement; CAI; Courseware; Development; Evaluation; Motivation

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650217557     PISSN: 14502267     EISSN: 14502267     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Almeqdadi, F. (2000). The effect of using the Geometer's Sketchpad (GSP) on Jordanian student understanding of geometrical concepts. Jordan: Yarmouk University. Retrieved on January 25 2007 from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/almeqdadi.pdf.
2. Bailey, D.H. (1996). Constructivism and multimedia: Theory and application; innovation and transformation. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23(2): 161-165.
3. Barron, A. E., Kemker, K., Harmes, C., Kaladijian K. (2003). Large-scale research study on technology in K-12 schools: technology integration as it relates to the national technology standards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4): 489-507.
4. Bork, A. (2001). Tutorial learning for the new century. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(1): 57-71.
5. Curriculum Development Centre. (2006). The latest status of delivery, installation and usage of GSP in school. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education.
6. Dixon, J. (1996). English Language proficiency and spatial visualization in middle school students' construction of the concepts of reflection and rotation using the GSP. Dissertation Abstract International, DAI-A 56111, University of Florida.
7. Ertmer, P. A., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Ross, E. M. (2001). Comparing perceptions of exemplary technology use to best practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(5). Retrieved on February 2 2007 from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Publications/JRTE/Issues/Volume_331/Number_5_Summer_2001/jrce-33-5-ertmer.pdf/
8. Furner, J. M. & Marinas, C. A. (2007). Geometry sketching software for elementary children: Easy as 1, 2, 3. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1):83-91.
9. th Ed.). Belmont CA:Wadsworth/ThomsonLearning.
10. Guha, S. & Leonard, J.(2002). Motivation in elementary mathematics: How students and teachers benefit from computers. TechTrends, 46(1):40-43.
11. Guha, S. (2003). Are we all technically prepared? Teachers' perspective on the causes of comfort or discomfort in using computers at elementary grades teaching. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2003(1): 317-349.
12. Harvey, J.G., Waits, B.K. & Demana, F.D. (1995). The influence of technology on the teaching and learning of algebra. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 14: 75-109.
13. Jonassen, D. H. Peck, K. L. & Wilson, B. G. 1999. Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall
14. Keller, J.M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance & Instruction, 26(8): 1-7.
15. Key Curriculum Press. (2001). The Geometer's Sketchpad Reference Manual. California: Key Curriculum Press.
16. Kok Boon Shiong., Baharuddin Aris, Maizah Hura Ahmad, Mohamad Bilal Ali, Jamaludin Harun& Tasir Zaidatun (2008). Learning Goal Programming using an interactive multimedia courseware: design factors and students' preferences. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(1): 59-79.
17. Kulik, J. A., Bangert, R. L. & Williams, G. W. 1984. Effects of computer- based educational teaching in secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology. 75(1): 19-26.
18. Lange, G. V. (2002). An experience with interactive geometry software and conjecture writing. Mathematics Teacher, 95(5), 336-337.
19. Ling, S. (2004). Enhancing the Learning of Conics with Technology. California: California State University Dominguez Hills.
20. Ministry of Education (2003a). Mathematics Form 1 Curriculum Specifications. Kuala Lumpur:Curriculum Development Centre.
21. Ministry of Education (2003b). Mathematics Form 2 Curriculum Specifications. Kuala Lumpur: Curriculum Development Centre.
22. Ministry of Education (2003c). Mathematics Form 3 Curriculum Specifications. Kuala Lumpur: Curriculum Development Centre.
23. Ministry of Education (2006a). Mathematics Form 4 Curriculum Specifications. Kuala Lumpur: Curriculum Development Centre.
24. Ministry of Education (2006b). Mathematics Form 5 Curriculum Specifications. Kuala Lumpur: Curriculum Development Centre.
25. Molenda, M., Pershing, J. A., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1996). Designing instructional systems. In S. L., Craig (Ed.). The ASTD Training and Development Handbook: A Guide to Human ResourceDevelopment. London: McGraw-Hill.
26. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school Mathematics. Reston.
27. Norhana Aini Mohamed Amin (2008). Development and evaluation of the introducation to Geometer's Sketchpad (GSP) district level course for secondary school Mathematics teachers. Unpublished project paper. Faculty of Educational Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang.
28. Nor Hayati Binti Hj. Mat Ali (2003). Pengajaran & pembelajaran Matematik berbantukan komputer. Keberkesanan perisian The Geometer's Sketchpad untuk tajuk penjelmaan. Paper presented at the Research in National Teacher Education Seminar, Holiday Inn Kuching, Malaysia August 19 - 20, 2003.
29. Nurul Hidayah Lucy Abdullah & Aziz Rejab (2005). Meningkatkan kemahiran guru pelatih dalam menentukan kedudukan pusat putaran dengan menggunakan Geometer's Sketchpad bagi matapelajaran Matematik. Paper presented at Educational Research Seminar, Batu Lintang Teachers Training College, Kuching, Sarawak, September 15-16, 2005.
30. Peterson, C (2003). Bringing ADDIE to life: Instructional design at its best. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(3): 227-241.
31. Prensky, M. (2005). Engage me or enrage me: What today's learner demand. Educause Review, 40(5): 61-65.
32. Roblyer, M. D. (2004). Educational Technology in Action: Problem-Based Exercises forTechnology Integration. Columbus, Ohio: Prentice-Hall.
33. th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
34. Steketee, S., Jackiw, N. & Chanan, S. (2001). The Geometer's Sketchpad Reference Manual. California: Key Curriculum Press.
35. Teoh Boon Tat & Fong Soon Fook (2005). The effects of Geometer's Sketchpad and graphic calculator in the Malaysian Mathematics classroom. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 2(2): 82-96.
36. Traynor, P. L. (2003). Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on different learners. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(2): 137-143.
37. Wan Mohd. Rani Abdullah (1998). Laporan Kajian: Keperluan Guru-guru Sekolah Rakan Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Sains dan Matematik. SEAMEO RECSAM Pulau Pinang.
38. Wenhoa, H., Wenyeh, H., Diefes-Dux, H., Imbrie, P. K. (2006). A preliminary validation of Attention, Relevance, Confidence and Satisfaction model-based Instructional Material Motivational Survey in a computer based tutoring setting. Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2): 243-259.
39. Wertherimer, R. (1990). The geometry proof tutor: An intelligent computer-based tutor in the classroom. Mathematics Teacher, April: 308-317.
40. rd Edition). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.