The whole moves less than the spin of its parts

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 675-679

  Kohler, Peter J ^a   Caplovitz, Gideon P ^b   Tse, Peter Ulric ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECELERATION; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECEPTIVE FIELD; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ATTENTION; DECELERATION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 67650159904     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.4.675     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ames, A. (1951). Visual perception and the rotating trapezoidal window. Psychological Monographs, 65, 1-32.
2. Anstis, S. (2003). Levels of motion perception. In L. Harris & M. Jenkin (Eds.), Levels of perception (pp. 75-99). New York: Springer.
3. Barraza, J.F., & Grzywacz, N.M. (2002). Measurement of angular velocity in the perception of rotation. Vision Research, 42, 2457-2462. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00259-6.
4. Bex, P. J., & Makous, W. (1997). Radial motion looks faster. Vision Research, 37, 3399-3405. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00088-6
5. Bex, P. J., Metha, A. B., & Makous, W. (1998). Psychophysical evidence for a functional hierarchy of motion processing mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 15, 769-776. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.15.000769
6. Britten, K. H., Newsome, W. T., & Saunders, R. C. (1992). Effects of inferotemporal cortex lesions on form-from-motion discrimination in monkeys. Experimental Brain Research, 88, 292-302.
7. Brown, J. F. (1931). The visual perception of velocity. Psychologische Forschung, 14, 199-232.
8. Caplovitz, G. P., Hsieh, P.-J., & Tse, P. U. (2006). Mechanisms underlying the perceived angular velocity of a rigidly rotating object. Vision Research, 46, 2877-2893. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.02.026
9. Caplovitz, G. P., & Tse, P. U. (2006). The bar-cross-ellipse illusion: Alternating percepts of rigid and nonrigid motion based on contour ownership and trackable feature assignment. Perception, 35, 993-997.
10. Caplovitz, G. P., & Tse, P. U. (2007a). Rotating dotted ellipses: Motion perception is driven by grouped figural rather than local dot motion signals. Vision Research, 47, 1979-1991. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.022
11. Caplovitz, G. P., & Tse, P. U. (2007b). V3A processes contour curvature as a trackable feature for the perception of rotational motion. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1179-1189. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl029
12. Castet, E., Lorenceau, J., Shiffrar, M., & Bonnet, C. (1993). Perceived speed of moving lines depends on orientation, length, speed and luminance. Vision Research, 33, 1921-1936. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(93)90019-S
13. Clifford, C. W. G., Beardsley, S. A., & Vaina, L. M. (1999). The perception and discrimination of speed in complex motion. Vision Research, 39, 2213-2227. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00314-9
14. Geesaman, B. J., & Qian, N. (1996). A novel speed illusion involving expansion and rotation patterns. Vision Research, 36, 3281-3292. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(96)00054-5
15. Geesaman, B. J., & Qian, N. (1998). The effect of complex motion pattern on speed perception. Vision Research, 38, 1223-1231. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00279-4
16. Klopfer, D. S. (1991). Apparent reversals of a rotating mask: A new demonstration of cognition in perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 522-530.
17. Lorenceau, J., & Shiffrar, M. (1992). The role of terminators in motion integration across contours. Vision Research, 32, 263-273.
18. Schoenfeld, M.A., Woldorff, M., Düzel, E., Scheich, H., Heinze, H.-J., & Mangun, G. R. (2003). Form-from-motion: MEG evidence for time course and processing sequence. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 15, 157-172. doi:10.1162/089892903321208105
19. Scott-Brown, K. C., & Heeley, D. W. (2001). The effect of the spatial arrangement of target lines on perceived speed. Vision Research, 41, 1669-1682. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00042-6
20. Shiffrar, M., Li, X., & Lorenceau, J. (1995). Motion integration across differing image features. Vision Research, 35, 2137-2146. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00299-1
21. Sinha, P., & Poggio, T. (1996). Role of learning in three-dimensional form perception. Nature, 384, 460-463.
22. Tse, P. U. (2006). Neural correlates of transformational apparent motion. Neuro Image, 31, 766-773. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.029
23. Tse, P. U., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). The duration of 3-D form analysis in transformational apparent motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 244-265.
24. Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Uttal, W. R., Spillmann, L., Stürzel, F., & Sekuler, A. B. (2000). Motion and shape in common fate. Vision Research, 40, 301-310. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00177-7
26. Verghese, P., & Stone, L. S. (1996). Perceived visual speed constrained by image segmentation. Nature, 381, 161-163. doi:10.1038/381161a0
27. Watamaniuk, S. N. J., Flinn, J., & Stohr, R. E. (2003). Segregation from direction differences in dynamic random-dot stimuli. Vision Research, 43, 171-180. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00434-0
28. Weiss, Y., & Adelson, E. H. (2000). Adventures with gelatinous ellipses-Constraints on models of human motion analysis. Perception, 29, 543-566.