Segregation from direction differences in dynamic random-dot stimuli

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 171-180

  Watamaniuk, Scott N J ^a   Flinn, Jeff ^a   Stohr, R Eric ^a  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Direction discrimination; Motion; Motion processing; Transparency

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0037234084     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00434-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Braddick O.J. Local and global representations of velocity: transparency, opponency, and global direction perception. Perception. 26:1997;995-1010.
2. Bravo M.J., Watamaniuk S.N.J. Evidence for two speed signals: A coarse local signal for segregation and a precise global signal for discrimination. Vision Research. 35:1995;1691-1697.
3. Finney D.J. Probit analysis. 1964;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Hiris E., Blake R. Direction repulsion in motion transparency. Visual Neuroscience. 13:1996;187-197.
5. Marshak W., Sekuler R. Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. Science. 205:1979;1399-1401.
6. Mather G., Moulden B. A simultaneous shift in apparent direction: Further evidence for a distribution-shift model of direction coding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 32:1980;325-333.
7. Rauber H.-J., Treue S. Revisiting motion repulsion: evidence for a general phenomenon. Vision Research. 39:1999;3187-3196.
8. Reid R.C., Soodak R.E., Shapley R.M. Directional selectivity and spatiotemporal structure of receptive fields of simple cells in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 66:1991;505-529.
9. Smith A.T., Curran W., Braddick O.J. What motion distributions yield global transparency and spatial segmentation. Vision Research. 39:1999;1121-1132.
10. Smith A.T., Snowden R.J., Milne A.B. Is global motion really based on spatial integration of local motion signals? Vision Research. 34:1994;2425-2430.
11. van Doorn A.J., Koenderink J.J. Temporal properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise. Experimental Brain Research. 45:1982a;179-188.
12. van Doorn A.J., Koenderink J.J. Spatial properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise. Experimental Brain Research. 45:1982b;189-195.
13. Watamaniuk S.N.J. An ideal observer for discrimination of the global direction of dynamic random dot stimuli. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 10:1993;16-28.
14. Watamaniuk S.N.J., McKee S.P. Simultaneous encoding of direction at a local and global scale. Perception and Psychophysics. 60:1998;191-200.
15. Watamaniuk S.N.J., Sekuler R. Temporal and spatial integration in dynamic random-dot stimuli. Vision Research. 32:1992;2341-2347.
16. Watamaniuk S.N.J., Sekuler R., Williams D.W. Direction perception in complex dynamic displays: The integration of direction information. Vision Research. 29:1989;47-59.
17. Westheimer G., Wehrhahn C. Direction discrimination of motion in human vision. Journal of Neurophysiology. 71:1994;33-37.
18. Williams D.W., Sekuler R. Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions. Vision Research. 24:1984;55-62.
19. Williams D., Tweten S., Sekuler R. Using metamers to explore motion perception. Vision Research. 31:1991;275-286.
20. Zohary E., Scase M.O., Braddick O.J. Integration across directions in dynamic random dot displays: Vector summation or winner take all? Vision Research. 36:1996;2321-2331.