Demographic determinants for cesarean delivery in Pattani Hospital

Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 602-611

  Rachatapantanakorn, Orasa ^a   Tongkumchum, Phattrawan ^b  

^a Universal Coverage and Social Welfare   (Thailand)

^b PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; DEMOGRAPHY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MATERNAL AGE; OCCUPATION; PREGNANCY; RELIGION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; THAILAND;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; ISLAM; LOGISTIC MODELS; MATERNAL AGE; OCCUPATIONS; PREGNANCY; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THAILAND; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67650129306     PISSN: 01251562     EISSN: 26975718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Cai WW, Marks JS, Chen CH, Zhuang YX, Morris L., Harris JR. Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of health insurance in Shanghai, China. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 777-80.
2. Chanrachakul B., Herabutya Y., Udomsubpayakul U. Epidemic of cesarean sections at general, private and university hospitals in Thailand. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2000; 26: 357-61.
3. Chanthasenanont A., Nanthakomon T., Kamudhamas A. Indications for cesarean at Thammasat University Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2007; 90:1733-7.
4. Chen CS, Lin HC, Liu TC, Lin SY, Pfeiffer S. Urbanization and the likelihood of cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 141: 104-10.
5. Choobun T., Tintara H. Risk factors of primary cesarean delivery after trial of labor. Songkla Med J 2000; 18: 23-9.
6. Gomes UA, Silva AAM, Bettiol H., Barbieri MA. Risk factors for the increasing cesarean section rate in Southeast Brazil: a comparison of two birth cohorts, 1978-1979 and 1994. Int J Epidemiol 1999; 28: 687-94.
7. Gonzalez-Perez GJ, Vega-Lopez MG, Cabrera- Pivaral C., Munoz A., Vale A. Cesarean section in Mexico: are there too many? Health Policy Plan 2001; 16: 62-7.
8. Hanvoravongchai P., Letiendumrong J., Teerawattanon Y., Tangcharoensathien V. Implications of private practice on the cesarean section rate in Thailand. HRHDJ 2000; 4: 2-12.
9. nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2000.
10. Khawaja M., Nsour M. Trends in the prevalence and determinants of cesarean section delivery in Jordan: Evidence from three demographic and health surveys, 1990-2002. JWHP 2007. [Cited 2009 Jan 20]. Available from: URL: (http://www.longwoods.com)
11. nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
12. Koc I. Increased cesarean section rates in Turkey. Eur J Contracep Repr 2003; 1: 1-10.
13. Kor-anantakul O., Suwanrath C., Lim A., Chongsuviwatwong V. Comparing complication in intended vaginal and cesarean deliveries. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 28: 64-8.
14. Kwee A., Cohlen BJ, Kanhai HHH, Bruinse HW, Visser GHA. Cesarean section on request: a survey in The Netherlands. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 113: 186-90.
15. Lee SI, Khang YH, Yun S., Jo MW. Rising rates, changing relationships: cesarean section and its correlates in South Korea, 1988-2000. BJOG 2005; 112: 810-9.
16. Leeb K., Baibergenova A., Wen E., Webster G., Zelmer J. Are there socio-economic difference in cesarean section rate in Canada? Healthcare Policy 2005; 1: 48-54.
17. Lee-Parritz A. Surgical techniques for cesarean delivery: what are the best practices? Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004; 47: 286-9.
18. Lin HC, Xirasagar S. Maternal age and the likelihood of a maternal request for cesarean delivery: A 5- year population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 848-55.
19. Nisenblat V., Barak S., Griness OB, Degani S., Ohel G., Gonen R. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 21-6.
20. Notzon FC, Cnattingius S., Bergsjø P., et al. Cesarean section, delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170: 495-504.
21. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2007. [Cited 2007 Jan 8]. Available from: URL: http://www.R-project.org
22. Rachatapantanakorn O., Tongkumchum P., Chaisuksant Y. Factors associated with birth asphyxia at Pattani Hospital. Songkla Med J 2005; 23: 17-27.
23. Simoes E., Kunz S., Bosing-Schwenkglenks M., Schmahl FW. Occupation and risk of cesarean section: study based on the perinatal survey of Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005; 271: 338-42.
24. Spaans WA, Sluijs MB. Roosmalen, JV, Bleker OP. Risk factors at cesarean section and failure of subsequent trial of labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Re-prod Biol 2002; 163-6.
25. Tangcharoensathien V., Lertiendumrong J., Hanvoravongchai P., Mills A., Bennet S. Cesarean deliveries in Thailand: Cause for Concern. Regional Health Forum 2002; 6: np. [Cited 2008 Jan 15]. Available from: URL: (http://www.searo.who.int/EN/Sectionl243/Sectionl310/Sectionl343/Sectionl344/ Sectionl356-5321.htm)
26. Zhang J., Liu Y., Meikle S., Zheng J., Li Z. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in Southeast China. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 1077-82.