Comparing complications in intended vaginal and caesarean deliveries

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 64-68

  Kor Anantakul, O ^a   Suwanrath, C ^a   Lim, A ^a   Chongsuviwatwong, V ^a  

^a PRINCE OF SONGKLA UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Caesarean delivery; Complications; Vaginal delivery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR COMPLICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; THAILAND; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; COHORT STUDIES; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; MATERNAL MORTALITY; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THAILAND;

EID: 38949143734     PISSN: 01443615     EISSN: 13646893     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01443610701812207     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte G. 2006. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. Art. No. CD006066. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD 006066.
2. Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Weber AM. 2004. Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 103:907-912.
3. Chaim W, Bashiri A, Bar-David J, Shoham-Vardi I, Mazor M. 2000. Prevalence and clinical significance of postpartum endometritis and wound infection. Infectious Disease in Obstetrics and Gynecology 8:77-82.
4. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC III, Wenstrom KD, editors. 2005. Williams obstetrics. 22nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp 711-724.
5. Dehbashi S, Honarvar S, Fardi FH. 2004. Manual removal or spontaneous placental delivery and postcesarean endometritis and bleeding. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 86:12-15.
6. Henderson E, Love EJ. 1995. Incidence of hospital-acquired infections associated with cesarean section. Journal of Hospital Infection 29:245-255.
7. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. 1992. CDC definitions of nosocomial; surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 13:606-608.
8. Lee-Parritz A. 2004. Surgical techniques for cesarean delivery: what are the best practices? Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 47:286-298.
9. Minkoff H, Powderly KR, Chevervenak F, McCullough LB. 2004. Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 103:387-392.
10. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D; CONSORT Group. 2005. The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials 2001. Explore (NY) 1:40-45.
11. Selo-Ojeme DO, Bhattacharjee P, Izuwa-Njoku NF, Kadir RA. 2005. Unscheduled peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary London hospital. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 271:154-159.
12. Smaill F, Hofmeyr GJ. 2002. Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 3. Art. No. CD 000933. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD 000933.
13. van Ham MA, van Dongen PW, Mulder J. 1997. Maternal consequences of caesarean section. A retrospective study of intra-operative and postoperative maternal complications of caesarean section during a 10-year period. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 74:741-746.