Occupation and risk of cesarean section: Study based on the perinatal survey of Baden-Württemberg, Germany

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 271, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 338-342

  Simoes, Elisabeth ^a   Kunz, Siegfried ^b   Bosing Schwenkglenks, Margarete ^c   Schmahl, Friedrich Wilhelm ^d  

^a C/o Med Serv Statutory Hlth I ^*  (Germany)

^b Klinikum am Steinenberg   (Germany)

^c C/o Hosp Soc Baden Wurttemberg EV ^*  (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cesarean delivery; Occupation; Perinatal survey data; Prenatal care

Indexed keywords

ANEMIA; CESAREAN SECTION; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ECLAMPSIA; FEMALE; FISHER EXACT TEST; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH HAZARD; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INDUSTRIALIZATION; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MOTHER; OBSTETRICS; OCCUPATION; PERINATAL PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL EXPOSURE; REVIEW; SALARY; SEPTICEMIA; SKILL; SOCIOECONOMICS; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; VAGINAL DELIVERY; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; WORKER; WOUND INFECTION;

CESAREAN SECTION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; OCCUPATIONS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; RISK FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 18744414229     PISSN: 09320067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-004-0616-z     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Adler NE, Newmann K (2002) Socioeconomic disparities in health - pathways and policies. Health Affairs 21:60-76
2. Association of Maryland Hospitals and Health Systems (2003) Maryland Hospital Association Quality Indicator Project. List of performance measures. http://www.qiproject.org/TargetQuality/TQ1297.asp#Wiscosin
3. Beguin F (1996) Surveillance de la grossesse dans le cadre de la nouvelle LAMal. Arch Gynecol Obstet 259 [Suppl]:84-87
4. Bundesgeschäftsstelle für Qualitätssicherung (2003) http://www.bqs-online.de
5. Chandrashekar S, Rao RS, Nair ND, Kutty PR (1998) Sociodemographic determinants of antenatal care. Trop Doct 28:206-209
6. Erata YE, Kilic B, Güclü S, Saygili U, Uslu T (2002) Risk factors for pelvic surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 267:14-18
7. Gissler M, Meriläinen J, Vuori E, Hemminki E (2002) Register based monitoring shows decreasing socioeconomic differences in Finnish perinatal health. Eur J Public Health 12 [Suppl]:57
8. Greenberg RS (1983) The impact of prenatal care in different social groups. Am J Obstet Gynecol 145:797-801
9. Hung S, Morrison DR, Whittingtion LA, Beck Fein S (2002) Prepartum work, job characteristics, and risk of cesarean delivery. Birth 29:10-16
10. Marcoux S, Bérubé S, Brisson C, Mondor M (1999) Job strain and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Epidemiology 10:376-382
11. Minkoff H, Chervenak FA (2003) Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 348:946-950
12. National Health Service (NHS), Department of Health (2002) NHS Performance indicators: February 2002. http://www.doh.gov.uk/ nhsperformanceindicators/2002/index. html
13. Paterson-Brown S (1998) Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? BMJ 317:462-463
14. Pinhas-Hamiel O, Rotstein Z, Achiron A, Gabbay U, Achiron R, Barak Y, Israeli A (1999) Pregnancy during residency - an Israeli survey of women physicians. Health Care Women Int 20:63-70
15. Rath W, Vetter K (2002) Der Kaiserschnitt zwischen Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Schwangeren, Mangel an gesichertem Wissen und ärztlicher Entscheidung. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilk 62:838-842
16. Ross CE, Wu C (1995) The links between education and health. Am Soc Rev 10:719-745
17. Simoes E, Kunz S, Bosing-Schwenkglenks M, Schwoerer P, Schmahl FW (2003) Inanspruchnahme der Schwangerenvorsorge - ein Spiegel gesellschaftlicher Entwicklungen und Aspekte der Effizienz. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 63:529-537
18. Trujillo-Hernández B, Rios-Silva M, Huerta M, Trujillo X, Vásquez C, Millán-Guerrero R (2002) Frequency of, indications for and clinical epidemiological characteristics of first time cesarean section, compared with repeated cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 267:27-32
19. Tussing AD, Wojtowyez M (1992) The cesarean decision in New York State 1986: economic and noneconomic aspects. Med Care 30:520-540
20. Villar J, Baáqeel H, Piaggio G, Lumbiganon P, Miguel Belizan J, Farnot U, Al-Mazrou Y, Carroli G, Pinol A, Donner A, Langer A, Nigenda G, Mugford M, Fox-Rushby J, Hutton G, Bergsjo P, Bakketeig L, Berendes H, Garcia J, WHO Antenatal Care Trial Research Group (2001) WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care. Lancet 357:1551-1564