Habitat selection: Implications for monitoring, management, and conservation

Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 54, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 459-471

  Jonzén, Niclas ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Conservation; Dispersal; Habitat selection; Harvesting; Ideal free distribution; Monitoring; Spatial population dynamics

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT SELECTION; IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTION; POLLUTION MONITORING; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION STRUCTURE; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 67650094603     PISSN: 15659801     EISSN: 22244662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1560/IJEE.54.3-4.459     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Abrams, P.A., Cressman, R., Křivan, V. 2007. The role of behavioral dynamics in determining the patch distribution of interacting species. Am. Nat. 169: 505-518.
2. Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M.L., Subach, A. 2001. The cost of interspecifc competition in two gerbil species. J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 561-567.
3. Bach, L.A., Ripa, J., Lundberg, P. 2007. On the evolution and conditional dispersal under environmental and demographic stochasticity. Evol. Ecol. Res. 9: 1-11.
4. berryman, A.A. 2002. Population: a central concept for ecology? Oikos 97: 439-442.
5. Boughton, D.A. 1999. Empirical evidence for complex source-sink dynamics with alternative states in a butterfy metapopulation. Ecology 80: 2727-2739.
6. Bowers, M.A. 1996. Species as indicators of large-scale environmental change: a computer simulation model of population decline. Ecoscience 3: 502-511.
7. Bowler, D.E., benton, T.G. 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol. Rev. 80: 205-225.
8. Boyce, M.S. 2006. Scale for resource selection functions. Divers. Distrib. 12: 269-276.
9. Boyce, M.S., Mcdonald, L.L. 1999. Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 268-272.
10. Brawn, J.D., Robinson, S.K. 1996. Source-sink population dynamics may complicate the interpretation of long-term census data. Ecology 77: 3-12.
11. Chalfoun, A.D., Martin, T.E. 2007. Assessments of habitat preferences and quality depend on spatial scale and metrics of ftness. J. Appl. Ecol. 44: 983-992.
12. Ciarniello, L.M., boyce, M.S., Seip, D.R. 2007. Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent. Ecol. Appl. 17: 1424-1440.
13. Cressman, R., Křivan, V. 2006. Migration dynamics for the ideal free distribution. Am. Nat. 168: 384-397.
14. Cressman, R., Křivan, V. , Garay, J. 2004. Ideal free distributions, evolutionary games, and population dynamics in multi-species environments. Am. Nat. 164: 473-489.
15. Davis, J.M., Stamps, J.A. 2004. The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 411-416.
16. Delibes, M., Gaona, P., Ferreras, P. 2001. Effects of an attractive sink leading into maladaptive habitat selection. Am. Nat. 158: 277-285.
17. Dias, P.C. 1996. Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 326-330.
18. Diffendorfer, J.E. 1998. Testing models of source-sink dynamics and balanced dispersal. Oikos 81: 417-433.
19. Earn, D.J.D., Johnstone, R.A. 1997. A systematic error in tests of ideal free theory. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. b 264: 1671-1675.
20. FAO. 2007. The state of world fsheries and aquaculture 2006. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
21. Fretwell, S.D. 1972. Populations in a seasonal environment. Monographs in population biology. Vol. 5. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 224 pp.
22. Fretwell, S.D., Lucas, H.L. 1969. On territorial behavior and other factors infuencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta biotheor. 19: 16-36.
23. Fryxell, J.M., Wilmshurst, J.F., Sinclair, A.R.E., Haydon, D.T., Holt, R.D., Abrams, P.A. 2005. Landscape scale, heterogeneity, and the viability of Serengeti grazers. Ecol. Lett. 8: 328-335.
24. Gårdmark, A., Jonzén, N., Mangel, M. 2006. Density-dependent body growth reduces the effciency of marine reserves. J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 61-69.
25. Gaston, K.J., Blackburn, T.M., Lawton, J.H. 1997. Interspecifc abundance range size relationships: An appraisal of mechanisms. J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 579-601.
26. Gilroy, J.J., Sutherland, W.J. 2007. beyond ecological traps: perceptual errors and undervalued resources. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 351-356.
27. Greenwood, J.J.D., baillie, S.R., Gregory, R.D., Peach, W.J., Fuller, R.J. 1995. Some new approaches to conservation monitoring of british breeding birds. Ibis 137: S16-S28 (suppl. 1).
28. Grinnell, J. 1917. Field tests of theories concerning distributional control. Am. Nat. 51: 115-128.
29. Hakoyama, H. 2003. The ideal free distribution when the resource is variable. behav. Ecol. 14: 109-115.
30. Hart, D.R. 2006. When do marine reserves increase fshery yield? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63: 1445-1449.
31. Haugen, T.O., Winfeld, I.J., Vøllestad, L.A., Fletcher, J.M., James, J.B., Stenseth, N.C. 2006. The ideal free pike: 50 years of ftness-maximizing dispersal in Windermere. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 273: 2917-2924.
32. Hilborn, R., Mangel, M. 1997. The ecological detective: confronting models with data. Princeton University Press, NJ, 338 pp.
33. Hobbs, N.T. 2003. Challenges and opportunities in integrating ecological knowledge across scales. For. Ecol. Manag. 181: 223-238.
34. Holt, R.D. 1997. On the evolutionary stability of sink populations. Evol. Ecol. 11: 723-731.
35. Holt, R.D., Barfeld, M. 2001. On the relationship between the ideal free distribution and the evolution of dispersal. In: Clobert, J., danchin, E., Nichols, J.D., eds. dispersal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 83-95.
36. James, F.C., McCullogh, C.E., Wiedenfeld, D.A. 1996. New approaches to the analysis of population trends in land birds. Ecology 77: 13-27.
37. Johnson, M.D. 2007. Measuring habitat quality: a review. Condor 109: 489-504.
38. Jonzén, N., Wilcox, C., Possingham, H.P. 2004. Habitat selection and population regulation in temporally fuctuating environments. Am. Nat. 164: E103-114.
39. Jonzén, N., Rhodes, J.R., Possingham, H.P. 2005. Trend detection in source-sink systems: when should sink habitats be monitored? Ecol. Appl. 15: 326-334.
40. Kennedy, M., Gray, R.D. 1993. Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging ani-mals - a critical analysis of experiments on the ideal free distribution. Oikos 68: 158-166.
41. Kisdi, E. 2002. dispersal: risk spreading versus local adaptation. Am. Nat. 159: 579-596.
42. Knight, T.W., Morris, D.W. 1996. How many habitats do landscapes contain? Ecology 77: 1756-1764.
43. Kokko, H., Sutherland, W.J. 2001. Ecological traps in changing environments: ecological and evolutionary consequences of a behaviourally mediated Allee effect. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3: 537-551.
44. Kristan, W.b., III. 2003. The role of habitat selection behaviour in population dynamics: source-sink systems and ecological traps. Oikos 103: 457-468.
45. Kun, A., Scheuring, I. 2006. The evolution of density-dependent dispersal in a noisy spatial population model. Oikos 115: 308-320.
46. Lack, D. 1933. Habitat selection in birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 2: 239-262.
47. Lele, S., Taper, M.L., Gage, S. 1998. Statistical analysis of population dynamics in space and time using estimating functions. Ecology 79: 1489-1502.
48. Levin, S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943-1967.
49. Lima, S.L., zollner, P.A. 1996. Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 131-135.
50. Lundberg, P., Jonzén, N. 1999a. Spatial population dynamics and the design of marine reserves. Ecol. Lett. 2: 129-134.
51. Lundberg, P., Jonzén, N. 1999b. Optimal population harvesting in a source-sink environment. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1: 719-729.
52. Mallord, J.W., dolman, P.M., brown, A.F., Sutherland, W.J. 2007. Linking recreational disturbance to population size in a ground-nesting passerine J. Appl. Ecol. 44: 185-195.
53. Manly, B.F.J., Mcdonald, L.L., Thomas, D.L. 1993. Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for feld studies. Chapman & Hall, London.
54. Matthysen, E. 2005. density-dependent dispersal in birds and mammals. Ecography 28: 403-416.
55. Mayr, E. 1926. die ausbreitung des Girlitz (Serinus canaria serinus L.). J. Ornithol. 74: 571-671.
56. McCoy, T.D., Ryan, M.R., Kurzejeski, E.W., burger, L.W. 1999. Conservation Reserve Program: source or sink habitat for grassland birds in Missouri? J. Wildl. Manage. 63: 530-538.
57. Morisita, M. 1950. dispersal and population density of a water strider, Gerris lacustris L. Contributions to Physiology and Ecology, Kyoto University. No. 65 (in Japanese).
58. Morris, D.W. 1987. Tests of density-dependent habitat selection in a patchy environment. Ecol. Monogr. 57: 269-281.
59. Morris, D.W. 1989. Density-dependent habitat selection: testing the theory with ftness data. Evol. Ecol. 3: 80-94.
60. Morris, D.W. 1992. Scales and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes. Evol. Ecol. 6: 412-432.
61. Morris, D.W. 2003. Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. Oecologia 136: 1-13.
62. Morris, D.W., diffendorfer, J.E., Lundberg, P. 2004. Dispersal among habitats varying in ftness: reciprocating migration through ideal habitat selection. Oikos 107: 559-575.
63. Oatway, M.L., Morris, D.W. 2007. do animals select habitat at small or large scales? An experiment with meadow voles (microtus pennsylvanicus). Can. J. zool. 85: 479-487.
64. Orians, G.H., Wittenberger, J.F. 1991. Spatial and temporal scales in habitat selection. Am. Nat. 137: S29-S49.
65. Palmqvist, E., Lundberg, P., Jonzén, N. 2000. Linking resource matching and dispersal. Evol. Ecol. 14: 1-12.
66. Pikitch, E.K., Santora, C., babcock, E.A., bakun, A., Bonfl, R., Conover, D.O., dayton, P., doukakis, P., Fluharty, D., Heneman, B., Houde, E.D., Link, J., Livingston, P.A., Mangel, M., McAllister, M.K., Pope, J., Sainsbury, K.J. 2004. Ecosystem-based fshery management. Science 305: 346-347.
67. Pulliam, H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132: 652-661.
68. Pulliam, H.R., danielson, B.J. 1991. Sources, sinks and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat. 137: 50-66.
69. Ranta, E., Lundberg, P., Kaitala, V. 1999. Resource matching with limited knowledge. Oikos 86: 383-385.
70. Recer, G.M., blanckenhorn, W.U., Newman, J.A., Tuttle, E.M., Withiam, M.L., Caraco, T. 1987. Temporal resource variability and the habitat-matching rule. Evol. Ecol. 1: 363-378.
71. Remes, V. 2000. How can maladaptive habitat choice generate source-sink population dymanics? Oikos 91: 579-582.
72. Rhodes, J.R., Tyre, A.J., Jonzén, N., McAlpine, C.A., Possingham, H.P. 2006. Optimizing presence-absence surveys for detecting population trends. J. Wildl. Manage. 70: 8-18.
73. Rice, J.C. 2005. Understanding fsh habitat ecology to achieve conservation. J. Fish Biol. 67 (suppl. b): 1-22.
74. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1981. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62: 327-335.
75. Rosenzweig, M.L. 1991. Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism. Am. Nat. 137: 5-28.
76. Sanchirico, J.N., Malvadkar, U., Hastings, A., Wilen, J.E. 2006. When are no-take zones an economically optimal fshery management strategy? Ecol. Appl. 16: 1643-1659.
77. Schauber, E.M., Goodwin, B.J., Jones, C.G., Ostfeld, R.S. 2007. Spatial selection and inheritance: Applying evolutionary concepts to population dynamics in heterogeneous space. Ecology: 1112-1118.
78. Schlaepfer, M.A., Runge, M.C., Sherman, P.W. 2002. Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trend Ecol. Evol. 17: 474-480.
79. Shepherd, T.D., Litvak, M.K. 2004. density-dependent habitat selection and the ideal free distribution in marine fsh spatial dynamics: considerations and cautions. Fish Fisheries 5: 141-152.
80. Stamps, J.A., Swaisgood, R.R. 2007. Someplace like home: experience, habitat selection and conservation biology. Appl. Anim. behav. Sci. 102: 392-409.
81. Suárez-Seoane, S., Osborne, P.E., Alonso, J.C. 2002. Large-scale habitat selection by agricultural steppe birds in Spain: identifying species-habitat responses using generalized additive models. J. Appl. Ecol. 39: 755-771.
82. Svärdsson, G. 1949. Competition and habitat selection in birds. Oikos 1: 157-174.
83. Travis, J.M.J., French, D.R. 2000. dispersal functions and spatial models: expanding our dispersal toolbox. Ecol. Lett. 3: 163-165.
84. Travis, J.M.J., Murrell, D.J., dytham, C. 1999. The evolution of density-dependent dispersal. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 266: 1837-1842.
85. Tregenza, T., Parker, G.A., Thompson, D.J. 1996. Interference and the ideal free distribution: Models and tests. behav. Ecol. 7: 379-386.
86. Tuck, G.N., Possingham, H.P. 2000. Marine protected areas for spatially structured stock. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 192: 89-101.
87. Tyler, J.A., Hargrove, W.W. 1997. Predicting spatial distribution of foragers over large resource landscapes: a modelling analysis of the Ideal Free distribution. Oikos 79: 376-386.
88. Watkinson, A.R., Sutherland, W.J. 1995. Sources, sinks and pseudosinks. J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 126-130.
89. Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 3: 385-397.