Developing a conceptual framework for an evaluation system for the NIAID HIV/AIDS clinical trials networks

Health Research Policy and Systems

Volumn 7, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Kagan, Jonathan M ^a   Kane, Mary ^b   Quinlan, Kathleen M ^b   Rosas, Scott ^b   Trochim, William M K ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (United States)

^b Department of Research   (United States)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DRUG RESEARCH; EVALUATION RESEARCH; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFECTION PREVENTION; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATIONAL RESTRUCTURING; PARTICIPATORY MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH PRIORITY; REVIEW; VIRUS TRANSMISSION;

EID: 67650088438     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14784505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-12     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Hanney SR Gonzalez-Block MA Building health research systems to achieve better health Health Res Policy Syst 2006, 4:10. 1636053 17087830 10.1186/1478-4505-4-10
2. Edgerton DEH Before big science: The pursuit of modern chemistry and physics, 1800-1940 Ann Sci 1999, 56(1):107-107
3. Nash SJ Stillman BW Large-scale biomedical science: Exploring strategies for future research Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press 2003
4. Institute of Medicine NIH extramural center programs Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press 2004
5. Inventory and Evaluation of Clinical Research Networks Core and descriptive survey final report 2006 http://www.clinicalresearchnetworks.org/documents/CDESum.pdf
6. Manning FG McGeary M Estabrook R Committee for Assessment of NIH Centers of Excellence Programs, Institute of Medicine, Board on Health Sciences Policy National institute of health extramural center programs: Criteria for initiation and evaluation 2004 http://www.nap.edu/ catalog.php?record_id=10919#orgs
7. Smith R Measuring the social impact of research: Difficult but necessary Br Med J 2001, 323:528. 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.528
8. Brainard J New science measures related by OMB Chron High Educ 2002 48
9. Brainard J White House proposes criteria for measuring progress and results of federally financed research Chron High Educ 2002 48
10. U.S. General Accounting Office NIH research: Improvements needed in monitoring external grants. Washington, D.C 2000 http://www.gao.gov/ new.items/h100139.pdf
11. U.S. Congress. Legislature National Institutes of Health Reform Act of 2006. Washington, D.C 2005 http://www.govtrack.us/congress/ billtext.xpd?bill=h109-6164
12. Brodsky R Bush orders agencies to appoint 'performance improvement officers' Government Executive.com 2007 http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/ 1107/111407ts1.htm
13. Bush GW Executive order: Improving government program performance The White House 2007 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/11/ 20071113-9.html#
14. National Research Council Evaluating federal research programs: Research and the government performance and results act Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press 1999 http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id= 6416
15. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine Implementing the government performance and results act for research, a status report Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press 2001 http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10106.html#toc
16. Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy Facilitating interdisciplinary research Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press 2004 http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11153#orgs
17. Trochim WM Markus SE Masse LC Moser RP Weld PC The evaluation of large research initiatives: A participatory integrative mixed-methods approach Am J Eval 2008, 29(1):8-28. 10.1177/1098214007309280
18. Stokols D Fuqua J Gress J Harvey R Phillips K Baezconde-Garbanati L Unger J Palmer P Clark M Colby S Morgan G Trochim W Evaluating transdisciplinary science Nicotine Tob Res 2003, 5(Suppl):S21-S39. 10.1080/14622200310001625555
19. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine An assessment of the national science foundation's science and technology centers program Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press 1996 http://www.nap.edu/books/0309053240/html/
20. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine Experiments in international benchmarking of US research fields Washington D.C.: National Academies Press 2000 http://www.nap.edu/ catalog.php?record_id=9784
21. Quinlan KM Kane M Trochim WM Evaluation of large Research initiatives: outcomes, challenges and methodological considerations New Directions for Evaluation 2008, 118:61-72. 10.1002/ev.261
22. O'Hara J Araujo JJ Choi M Pepper C Wagner R Wang G Woollery T Evaluating Public Research Investment Presentation at the Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association, Baltimore, MD, USA 2007
23. Dilts DM Sandler AB Baker M Cheng SK George SL Karas KS McGuire S Menon GS Reusch J Sawyer D Scoggins M Wu A Zhou K Schilsky RL Processes to activate phase III clinical trials in a cooperative oncology group: The case of cancer and leukemia group b J Clin Oncol 2006, 24(28):4553-4557. 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7819 17008694
24. Dilts DM Sandler AB The "invisible" barriers to clinical trials: The impact of structural, infrastructural, and procedural barriers to opening oncology clinical trials J Clin Oncol 2006, 24(28):4545-4552. 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0104 17008693
25. Doroshow JH CTWG evaluation plan results of baseline feasibility analysis National Cancer Institute 3rd meeting of the clinical trials advisory committee. Bethesda, USA 2007
26. Cousins JB Whitmore E Framing participatory evaluation New Directions for Evaluation 1998, 80:5-23. 10.1002/ev.1114
27. King JA Making sense of participatory evaluation practice New Directions for Evaluation 1998, 80:57-67. 10.1002/ev.1117
28. Patton MQ Utilization-focused evaluation Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications 3 1997
29. Howell EM Yemane A An assessment of evaluation designs, case studies of twelve large federal evaluations Am J Eval 2006, 27(2):219-236. 10.1177/ 1098214006287557
30. Trochim WM An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation Evaluation and Program Planning 1989, 12:1-16. 10.1016/ 0149-7189(89)90016-5
31. Kane M Trochim WM Concept mapping for planning and evaluation Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications 2007
32. Andersen L Gwaltney M Sundra D Brownson R Kane M Cross A Mack R Schwartz R Sims T White C Using Concept Mapping to Develop a Logic Model for the Prevention Research Centers Program Prev Chronic Dis 2006:3. 1 1500964 16356363
33. Coxon APM Sorting data: Collection and analysis Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications 1999
34. Rosenberg S Kim MP The method of sorting as a data gathering procedure in multivariate research Multivariate Behav Res 1975, 10:489-502. 10.1207/s15327906mbr1004_7
35. Weller SC Romney AK Systematic Data Collection Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage Publications 1988
36. Davison ML Multidimensional Scaling New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons 1983
37. Kruskal JB Wish M Multidimensional scaling Beverly Hills, CA, USA: Sage Publications 1978
38. Shepard RN Romney AK Nerlove SB Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences New York, NY, USA: Seminar Press 1972 1
39. Anderberg MR Cluster analysis for applications New York, NY, USA: Academic Press 1973
40. Everitt B Cluster Analysis New York, NY, USA: Halsted Press, A Division of John Wiley and Sons 2 1980
41. Concept Systems, Inc http://www.conceptsystems.com/download/ DAIDS_Methodology_FAQ_02-26-06_Kagan_Quinlan.pdf
42. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) Good participatory practice guidelines for biomedical HIV prevention trials. France 2007 http://data.unaids.org/pub/Manual/2007/ jc1364_good_participatory_guidelines_en.pdf
43. W.K. Kellogg Foundation Using logic models to bring together planning, evaluation and action: Logic model development guide. Michigan 2004 http://www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub3669.pdf
44. Pardo TA Dawes SS Cresswell AM Thompson F Kumar Tayi G Finding our future: A research agenda for the research enterprise Albany, NY, USA: Center for Technology in Government, University at Albany, SUNY 2002
45. Inventory and Evaluation of Clinical Research Networks Best practices study final report. Rockville 2006 http://www.clinicalresearchnetworks.org/documents/BPESum.pdf