Making sense of participatory evaluation practice

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 1998, Issue 80, 1998, Pages 57-67

  King, Jean A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85017058339     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.1117     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Carr, W., and Kemmis, S., Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research.London: Falmer, 1992.
2. Cousins, J. B., and Earl, L. M., “The Case for Participatory Evaluation.“Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1992, 14(4), 397-418.
3. Fish, S., Professional Correctness.Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
4. King, J. A., “Review of Action Research: A Short Modern History by R. McTaggart.“Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1994, 6(4), 465.
5. King, J. A., “How Viable Is Participatory Evaluation in School Settings?“In J. B.Cousinsand L. M.Earl (eds.), Participatory Evaluation.London: Falmer, 1995.
6. King, J. A., and Lonnquist, M. P., A Review of Writing on Action Research: 1944-Present.Minneapolis: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, 1994.
7. Krueger, R. A., and King, J. A., Involving Community Members in Focus Groups.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1997.
8. McTaggart, R., Action Research: A Short Modern History.Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press, 1991.
9. Nunneley, R. D., “Inquiry, Practice, Consequence: Educational Action Research and the Neopragmatist Spirit.“Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1997.
10. Nunneley, R. D., Jr., Orton, R. E., and King, J. A., “Validating Standards for Action Research.“Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Mar. 1997.
11. Patton, M. Q., Utilization-Focused Evaluation. (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1997.
12. Van Manen, M., Researching the Lived Experience.London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario, 1990.