Technology I, II, and III: Criteria for understanding and improving the practice of instructional technology

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 377-392

  McDonald, Jason K ^a   Gibbons, Andrew S ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical thinking; Innovation diffusion; Instructional quality; Reflective practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650085837     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-007-9051-8     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abdulrazzaq, Y. M.., & Qayed, K. I. (1991). A study of the attitudes of the foundation staff of a new medical faculty to problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, 13(4), 281-288.
2. Abrandt Dahlgren, M., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2002). Portraits of PBL: Students' experiences of the characteristics of problem-based learning in physiotherapy, computer engineering and psychology. Instructional Science, 30, 111-127.
3. Barrows, H. S. (1983). Problem-based, self-directed learning. Journal of the American Medical Association, 250(2), 3077-3080.
4. Barrows, H. S. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
5. Barrows, H. S. (1.986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481-486.
6. Barrows, H. S. (1994). Practice-based learning: Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
7. Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. In L. Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice (Vol. 68, pp. 3-12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
8. Barrows, H. S., & Mitchell, D. L. M. (1975). An innovative course in undergraduate neuroscience: Experiment in problem-based learning with 'problem, boxes'. British Journal of Medical Education, 9, 223-230.
9. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer Pub. Co.
10. Beckwith, D. (1.988). The future of educational technology. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 17(1), 3-20.
11. Bridges, E. M., & Hallinger, P. (1996). Problem-based learning in leadership education. In L. Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice (Vol. 68, pp. 53-6.1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
12. Chen, S. E., Cowdroy, R. M., Kingsland, A., & Ostwald, M. (1994). Reflections on problem based learning. In S. E. Chen, R. M. Cowdroy, A. Kingsland, & M. Ostwald (Eds.), Reflections on problem based learning (pp. 7-13). Sydney, Australia: Australian Problem Based Learning Network.
13. Clark, D. C. (2001). Lost in the mêlée. In P. Schwartz, M. Stewart, & G. Webb (Eds.), Problem-based learning: Case studies, experience and practice (pp. 34-39). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing Inc.
14. Danziger, K. (1985). The methodological imperative in psychology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 15, 1-13.
15. Davies, I. K. (1973). Competency based learning: Technology, management, and design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Davies, I. K. (1978). Educational technology: Archetypes, paradigms, and models. In J. Hartley & I. K. Davies (Eds.), Contributions to an educational technology (Vol. 2, pp. 9-24). New York: Crane, Russak & Company, Inc.
17. Davies, I. K. (1989). Total, educational technology (TET): Challenging current limits. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 18(2), 132-136.
18. Davies, I. K. (1.997). Paradigms and conceptual ISD systems. In C. R. Dills, & A. J. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional development paradigms (pp. 31-44). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
19. du Boulay, B. (2000). Can we learn from ITSs? In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: 5th international conference, ITS 2000, Montrdeal, canada, June 19-23, 2000: Proceedings (pp. 9-17). New York: Springer.
20. Galanter, E. (1959). The ideal teacher. In E. Galanter (Ed.), Automatic teaching: The state of the art (pp. 1-11). New York: Wiley.
21. Gibbons, A. S. (2001). Model-centered instruction. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 14, 511-540.
22. Gibbons, A, S. (2003). What and how do designers design? A theory of design structure. TechTrends, 47(5), 22-27.
23. Gilbert, T. F. (1960). On the relevance of laboratory .investigation of learning to self-instructional programming. In A. A. Lumsdaine & R. Glaser (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed learning: A source book (pp. 475-4-85). Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States.
24. Glaser, R. (1977). Adaptive education: Individual diversity and learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
25. Glew, R. H. (2003). The problem with problem-based medical education: Promises not kept. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 31(1), 52-56.
26. Gordon, J., & Zemke, R. (2000). The attack on ISD. Training, 57(4), 42-53.
27. Häkkinen, P. (2002). Challenges for design of computer-based learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 461-4.69.
28. Heestand, D. E., Templeton, B. B., & Adams, B. D. (1.989). Responding to perceived needs of the twentyfirst century: A case study in curriculum design. Medical Teacher, 11(2), 157-167.
29. Herreid, C. F. (2003). The death of problem-based learning? Journal of College Science Teaching, 320), 364-366.
30. Hlynka, D., & Nelson, B. (1985). Educational technology as metaphor. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 22(1), 7-15.
31. Inouye, D. K., Merrill, P. F., & Swan, R. H. (2005). Help: Toward a new ethics-centered paradigm for instructional design and technology [Electronic Version]. IDT Record. Retrieved August 26,2006 from. ht.tp://www.indiana.edu/~idt/articles/documents/lnouye-prim-version.pdf.
32. Januszewski, A. (200.1). Educational technology: The development of a concept. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
33. Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Technology as cognitive tools: Learners as designers. Retrieved August 26, 2006, from. http://itechl.coe.uga.edu/itfo.rum/ paper1/paper1.html.
34. Kaufman, A., Mennin, S., Waterman, R., Duban, S., Hansbarger, C., Silverblatt, H., et al. (1989). The New Mexico experiment: Educational innovation and institutional change. Academic Medicine, 64, 285-294.
35. Kirschner, S. R. (2005). Toward critical openness. In B. D. Slife, J. S. Reber, & F. C. Richardson (Eds.), Critical thinking about psychology: Hidden assumptions and plausible alternatives (pp. 267-277). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36. Kovalik, C. L. (1999). Technology integration and problem-based learning: Implications for teaching and learning. Unpublished Thesis (Ph. D.), Kent State University, School of Education.
37. Lumsdaine, A. A. (1964). Educational technology, programed learning, and instructional science. In E. R. Hilgard (Ed.), Theories of learning and instruction: The sixty-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 371-401). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
38. Maudsley, G. (1999). Do we all mean the same thing by "Problem-based learning"? A review of the concepts and a formulation of the ground rules. Academic Medicine, 74(2), 178-185.
39. McDonald, J. K. (2006). Technology I, II, and III: Criteria for understanding and improving the practice of instructional technology. Unpublished Thesis (Ph. D.), Brigham Young University, Department of Instructional Psychology and Technology.
40. Mitchell, P. D. (1989). The future of educational technology is past. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 18(1), 3-27.
41. Osguthorpe, R. T., & Osguthorpe, R. D. (2002). Re-examining the foundations of instructional design: Toward a conscience of craft. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Dallas, TX.
42. Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2004). A development research agenda for online collaborative learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 53-65.
43. Reigeluth, C. M. (2001). What every AECT member needs to know about systemic change: The beginning of a dialogue. TechTrends, 46(1), 12-15.
44. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
45. Salomon, G. (2002). Technology and pedagogy: Why don't we see the promised revolution? Educational Technology, 42(2), 71-75.
46. Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Problem-based learning in higher education: Untold stories. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
47. Schor, N. F. (2001). No money where your mouth is. In P. Schwartz, M. Stewart, & G. Webb (Eds.), Problem-based learning: Case studies, experience and practice (pp. 20-26). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing Inc.
48. Slife, B. D. (1998). Raising the consciousness of researchers: Hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15(3), 208-221.
49. Slife, B. D., & Williams, R. N. (1995). What's behind the research: Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
50. Suppes, P. (1969). Personalizing education through, computers. In R. C. Atkinson & H. A. Wilson (Eds.), Computer-assisted instruction: A book of readings (pp. 41-47). New York: Academic Press, (Reprinted from Phi Delta Kappan, 49(8), 420-423, 1968).
51. Williams, R. N. (2005). The language and methods of science: Common assumptions and uncommon conclusions. In B. D. Slife, J. S. Reber, & F. C. Richardson (Eds.), Critical thinking about psychology: Hidden assumptions and plausible alternatives (pp. 235-249). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
52. Wilson, B. G. (1997). The postmodern paradigm.. In C. R. Dills & A. J. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional development paradigms (pp. 297-309). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
53. Wilson, B. G. (2005). Broadening our foundation for instructional design: Four pillars of practice. Educational Technology, 45(2), 10-15.